Lacrimal intubation during dacryocystorhinostomy utilizing the STENTube.

The traditional use of the Crawford tube for lacrimal intubation during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) carries several drawbacks. We describe the use of the STENTube for DCR intubation and detail its advantages. Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series; 313 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) underwent 339 DCRs (216 external, 123 endonasal) with the STENTube from January 2007 - June 2013 by 5 surgeons (RS, QN, TS, SB, TN) across 3 institutions (SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Texas Oculoplastics Consultants, and Moorfields Eye Hospital). Study outcome measures included patient demographics, surgical complications, and epiphora improvement/resolution. 206 (66%) females and 107 (34%) males had a mean age of 63 years (range 2-94 years). Distribution of diagnoses included: 314 complete idiopathic acquired NLDO, 20 partial idiopathic acquired NLDO, and 5 congenital complete NLDO. 316 (93%) were primary DCRs and 23 (7%) were revisions. Epiphora improved in 312 (92%) cases with 294 (86%) experiencing resolution with patent lacrimal irrigation at a mean last follow-up of 9.4 months. Twenty-eight (8%) patients experienced surgical complications with 16 (5%) experiencing tube prolapse, and 20 (6%) requiring re-operation. The STENTube represents a simple method for lacrimal intubation during external or endonasal DCR at a comparable cost to the Crawford tube. It allows for low prolapse rates without the need for additional endonasal fixation procedures, resulting in a simple and comfortable post-operative extraction without risk of lacrimal trauma. The STENTube is our preferred intubation technique during DCR, and should be considered by oculofacial surgeons performing DCR with intubation.

Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor in conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. METHODS: A retrospective, observational case series of 5 patients with biopsy-proven conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma treated at one institution between January 1996 and April 2004. Medical records and tissue specimens from the 5 patients were reviewed. A control specimen of normal conjunctiva was also obtained from one of the 5 patients. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against EGFR. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical staining showed that EGFR expression was moderate to strong in all tissue specimens, both in the normal mucosa and in the in situ and invasive components of the conjunctival squamous cell carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: An intense expression of EGFR occurs in squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Further study is needed to determine whether an EGFR inhibitor that targets this expression would have potential therapeutic benefit in treating squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva.

Growth factor receptor expression in orbital lymphangioma: possible therapeutic implications.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the expression of molecules targeted by imatinib mesylate (STI571;Gleevec) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in orbital lymphangiomas. DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Six patients with orbital lymphangioma treated at four institutions between March 2000 and December 2002. METHODS: Tissue specimens and medical records from six patients were collected. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha and beta and EGFR tyrosine kinase.

Nasolacrimal duct obstruction associated with radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid carcinoma.

A 50-year-old woman presented with a 5-year history of unilateral epiphora that began shortly after 131I therapy for thyroid carcinoma. A recent recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (Thyrogen) scan had shown a focus of uptake adjacent to the right eye that was initially thought to be a possible metastasis. Probing and irrigation revealed complete blockage of the right nasolacrimal duct. The patient underwent a right dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and biopsy of the lacrimal sac. Histopathologic examination of the lacrimal sac and nasal mucosa revealed foreign-body reaction and fibrosis with no malignant cells. A repeat Thyrogen scan after DCR showed no residual focus of activity in the nose or near the lacrimal sac and confirmed reestablishment of lacrimal drainage on the right side. This case demonstrates that 131I therapy for thyroid carcinoma can be associated with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The appearance of a focus of uptake near the lacrimal sac on Thyrogen scanning in a patient with a history of thyroid carcinoma may not be due to a new focus of metastasis and may indeed be due to pooling of 131I in the lacrimal sac due to nasolacrimal duct blockage.

The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate complications and risk factors associated with the placement of wrapped and unwrapped porous polyethylene (PP) spherical implants after evisceration, enucleation, or secondary implantation. METHODS: A retrospective, interventional, noncomparative case series of consecutive cases of PP implant placement after anophthalmic socket surgery performed by three surgeons over a 5-year period. A PP spherical implant was placed in 133 patients, 61 women (2 bilaterally) and 72 men (1 bilaterally). There were 91 enucleations, 30 eviscerations, and 15 secondary implant placements. Sixty-six (48.5%) implants were wrapped prior to placement. Parameters evaluated included: age, sex, prior ocular surgery or radiation treatment, indications for surgery, procedure performed, size of PP sphere, material used to wrap the implant, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 of 136 (12.5%) cases had documented postoperative complications, with implant exposure being the most common. In 5 patients (3.7%), implant exposure developed: 1 after evisceration and 4 after primary enucleation. Three of the five exposures were small and resolved with either observation alone or in one case with surgical revision of the socket. In two cases, the exposures were large enough that removal of the implant was indicated, one after evisceration and the other after enucleation with placement of a wrapped PP sphere. CONCLUSIONS: Our series revealed no significant difference in exposure rate between wrapped and unwrapped PP sphere implants, nor was the exposure rate affected by whether an eye was eviscerated or enucleated.