Performance of ChatGPT on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Preparation Questions.

INTRODUCTION: Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a large language model capable of generating human-like text. This study sought to evaluate ChatGPT's performance on Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) self-assessment questions. METHODS: General surgery multiple choice questions were randomly selected from the SCORE question bank. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5, April-May 2023) evaluated questions and responses were recorded. RESULTS: ChatGPT correctly answered 123 of 200 questions (62%). ChatGPT scored lowest on biliary (2/8 questions correct, 25%), surgical critical care (3/10, 30%), general abdomen (1/3, 33%), and pancreas (1/3, 33%) topics. ChatGPT scored higher on biostatistics (4/4 correct, 100%), fluid/electrolytes/acid-base (4/4, 100%), and small intestine (8/9, 89%) questions. ChatGPT answered questions with thorough and structured support for its answers. It scored 56% on ethics questions and provided coherent explanations regarding end-of-life discussions, communication with coworkers and patients, and informed consent. For many questions answered incorrectly, ChatGPT provided cogent, yet factually incorrect descriptions, including anatomy and steps of operations. In two instances, it gave a correct explanation but chose the wrong answer. It did not answer two questions, stating it needed additional information to determine the next best step in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT answered 62% of SCORE questions correctly. It performed better at questions requiring standard recall but struggled with higher-level questions that required complex clinical decision making, despite providing detailed responses behind its rationale. Due to its mediocre performance on this question set and sometimes confidently-worded, yet factually inaccurate responses, caution should be used when interpreting ChatGPT's answers to general surgery questions.

Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy During Pancreatic Cancer Surgery in the Modern Era.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in preoperative image resolution, approximately 10% of curative-intent resection attempts for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are aborted at the time of operation. To avoid nontherapeutic laparotomy, many surgeons perform intraoperative diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) to identify radiographically occult metastatic disease. There are no consensus guidelines regarding DL in pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of same-procedure DL at avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2016 to 2022, identifying 196 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who were taken to the operating room for open curative-intent resection. Patient demographic, tumor characteristic, treatment, and outcome data were abstracted. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated to identify number of DLs necessary to avoid one nontherapeutic laparotomy. RESULTS: Curative-intent resection was achieved in 161 (82.1%) patients. One hundred twenty six (64.0%) patients received DL prior to resection and DL identified metastatic disease in three (2.4%) patients with an NNT of 42. NNT of DL in a subgroup analysis performed on clinically high-risk patients (defined by preoperative or preneoadjuvant therapy carbohydrate antigen 19-9 > 500 U/mL) is 11. Receipt of DL did not prolong operative times in patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy when accounting for completed versus aborted resection. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraoperative DL is a short procedure with minimal morbidity, these data demonstrate that same-procedure DL has potential efficacy in avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy only in a subgroup of clinically high-risk patients. Focus should remain on optimizing preoperative patient selection and further investigating novel diagnostic markers predictive of occult metastatic disease.

Evaluation of association between center colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm volume and survival among patients with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although correlation between center volume and survival has been reported for several complex cancers, it remains unknown if this is true for colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (CRNECs). We hypothesized that higher center annual volume of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resections would be associated with overall survival (OS) for patients with CRNECs. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stages I-III CRNEC between 2006 and 2018 and who underwent surgical resection were identified. The mean annual colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resection volume threshold associated with significantly worse mortality hazard was determined using restricted cubic splines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to compare OS, while Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: There were 694 patients with CRNEC who met inclusion criteria across 1229 centers. Based on the cubic spline, centers treating fewer than one colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm patient every 3 years on average had worse outcomes. Centers below this threshold were classified as low-volume (LV) centers corresponding with 42% of centers and about 15% of the patient cohort. In unadjusted survival analysis, LV patients had a median OS of 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10-19) while those treated at HV centers had a median OS of 33 months (95% CI: 25-49). In multivariable analysis, resection at a LV center was associated with increased risk of mortality (1.42 [95% CI: 1.01-2.00], p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: CRNEC patients have a dire prognosis; however, treatment at an HV center may be associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Implementation of a high-resolution, high-contrast magnetic resonance imaging protocol with extended delayed phases for peritoneal mesothelioma.

Background: Imaging of peritoneal malignancies using conventional cross-sectional imaging is challenging, but accurate assessment of peritoneal disease burden could guide better selection for definitive surgery. Here we demonstrate feasibility of high-resolution, high-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of peritoneal mesothelioma and explore optimal timing for delayed post-contrast imaging. Methods: Prospective data from inpatients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), imaged with a novel MRI protocol, were analyzed. The new sequences augmenting the clinical protocol were (I) pre-contrast coronal high-resolution T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo (COR hr T2w SSH FSE) of abdomen and pelvis; and (II) post-contrast coronal high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted modified Dixon (COR hr T1w mDIXON) of abdomen, acquired at five delay times, up to 20 min after administration of a double dose of contrast agent. Quantitative analysis of contrast enhancement was performed using linear regression applied to normalized signal in lesion regions of interest (ROIs). Qualitative analysis was performed by three blinded radiologists. Results: MRI exams from 14 participants (age: mean ± standard deviation, 60±12 years; 71% male) were analyzed. The rate of lesion contrast enhancement was strongly correlated with tumor grade (cumulative nuclear score) (r=-0.65, P<0.02), with 'early' delayed phase (12 min post-contrast) and 'late' delayed phase (19 min post-contrast) performing better for higher grade and lower grade tumors, respectively, in agreement with qualitative scoring of image contrast. Conclusions: High-resolution, high-contrast MRI with extended post-contrast imaging is a viable modality for imaging peritoneal mesothelioma. Multiple, extended (up to 20 min post-contrast) delayed phases are necessary for optimal imaging of peritoneal mesothelioma, depending on the grade of disease.

Epidemiology and survival outcomes of colorectal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare subtype of neuroendocrine neoplasm consisting of ≥30% each of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine differentiation. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. The epidemiology and prognosis of colorectal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas are not clearly defined in the literature. We sought to examine the presentation, patterns of care, and outcomes of patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with stage I-III colorectal (excluding appendix) mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms or neuroendocrine carcinomas with only one-lifetime cancer diagnosis who underwent surgical resection between 2010 and 2018 from the National Cancer Database. We performed bidirectional selection to identify variables to include in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We identified 189 patients with a diagnosis of stage I to III colorectal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, 66% of whom had poorly differentiated tumors and 482 with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Among patients with stage III disease, 68% of patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and 54% of patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median survival for the overall patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas cohorts were 38 and 42 months, respectively (P = .22), and the median survival for patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas with stage III disease were 30 and 25 months, respectively (P = .27). In multivariable analysis, fewer number of positive nodes and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with decreased risk of mortality for patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in stage III mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Future studies are warranted to identify subsets of patients benefiting most from adjuvant therapy.

Characteristics and symptomatology of colorectal cancer in the young.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients <50 years has rapidly risen recently. Understanding the presenting symptoms may facilitate earlier diagnosis. We aimed to delineate patient characteristics, symptomatology, and tumor characteristics of colorectal cancer in a young population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating patients <50 years diagnosed between 2005 and 2019 with primary colorectal cancer at a university teaching hospital. The number and character of colorectal cancer-related symptoms at presentation was the primary outcome measured. Patient and tumor characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Included were 286 patients with a median age of 44 years, with 56% <45 years. Nearly all patients (95%) were symptomatic at presentation, with 85% having 2 or more symptoms. The most common symptoms were pain (63%), followed by change in stool habits (54%), rectal bleeding (53%), and weight loss (32%). Diarrhea was more common than constipation. More than 50% had symptoms for at least 3 months before diagnosis. The number and duration of symptoms were similar in patients older than 45 compared to those younger. Most cancers were left-sided (77%) and advanced stage at presentation (36% stage III, 39% stage IV). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young patients with colorectal cancer, the majority presented with multiple symptoms having a median duration of 3 months. It is essential that providers be mindful of the ever-increasing incidence of colorectal malignancy in young patients, and that those with multiple, durable symptoms should be offered screening for colorectal neoplasms based on symptoms alone.

Peritoneal Metastases After Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Resection: How Common are They?

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal metastases (PMs) following resection of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are rare. Consequently, prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis are not well known. We reviewed our institution's experience and published literature to further characterize the scope of this phenomenon. METHODS: All pancreatectomy cases (556 patients) performed at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed to identify IPMN diagnoses. Patients with adenocarcinoma not arising from IPMN, or a history of other malignancies were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent pancreatectomy with IPMN on final pathology at our institution; 51 met inclusion criteria. Of these, there were five cases of PMs (4:1 females:males). Four had invasive carcinoma arising from IPMN and one had high-grade dysplasia at the index operation. Female sex and invasive histology were significantly associated with PM (P < 0.05). PM rates by sex were 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-15) in males and 22% (95% CI: 9-45) in females. Rates by histology were 2.9% (95% CI: 0.5-15) for noninvasive IPMN, and 23.5% (95% CI: 9.5-47) for invasive carcinoma arising from IPMN. Median interval from surgery to PMs was 7 mo (range: 3-13). CONCLUSIONS: PMs following IPMN resection are rare but may be more common in patients with invasive histology. Although rare, PMs can arise in patients with noninvasive IPMNs. Further studies on pathophysiology and risk factors of PM following IPMN resection are needed and may reinforce adherence to guidelines recommending long-term surveillance.

Surgical Management of G3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare, aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. The World Health Organization 2017 and 2019 classifications further subdivided G3 NENs into G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Current guidelines favor medical management in most of these patients, and the role of surgical management is not well defined. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical management versus nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search date: 16 July 2021) was conducted. Individual patient survival data were reconstructed, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies comprising 1810 surgical and 910 nonsurgical patients were systematically reviewed. Publication bias adjusted meta-analysis of 12 studies (1788 surgical and 857 nonsurgical patients) showed increased overall survival (OS) after surgical compared with nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.53]. Subgroup meta-analyses showed increased OS after surgical management for both pancreatic and gastrointestinal primary sites separately. In another subgroup meta-analysis of G3 GEP NETs (not NECs), surgical management was associated with increased OS compared with nonsurgical management (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of G3 GEP NENs may provide a potential survival benefit in well-selected cases. Further research is needed to define which patients will benefit most from surgical versus nonsurgical management. The current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting of survival outcomes in surgical versus nonsurgical groups, tumor grade, differentiation, primary tumor site, and selection criteria for surgical and nonsurgical management.

Is There a Role for Surgical Resection of Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

BACKGROUND: Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are aggressive tumors with poor survival outcomes for which medical management is generally recommended. This study sought to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated G3 GEP-NEN patients. METHODS: A single-institutional prospective NEN database was reviewed. Patients with G3 GEP-NENs based on World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 definitions included well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G3NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3NEC). Clinicopathologic factors were compared between groups. Overall survival from G3 diagnosis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed for 463 patients (211 G1, 208 G2, 44 G3). Most had metastatic disease at presentation (54% G1, 69% G2, 91% G3; p < 0.001). The G3 cohort included 39 G3NETs and 5 G3NECs, 22 of pancreatic and 22 of midgut origin. Median overall survival (mOS; in months) was 268.1 for G1NETs, 129.9 for G2NETs, 50.5 for G3NETs, and 28.5 for G3NECs (p < 0.001). Over the same period, 31 G3 patients (12 G3NETs, 19 G3NECs) were treated non-surgically, with mOS of 19.0 for G3NETs and 12.4 for G3NECs. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of G3 GEP-NENs remains controversial due to poor prognosis, and surgical series are rare. This large, single-institutional study found significantly lower mOS in patients with resected G3NENs than those with G1/G2 tumors, reflecting more aggressive tumor biology and a higher proportion with metastatic disease. The mOS for resected G3NETs and G3NECs exceeded historical non-surgical G3NEN series (mOS 11-19 months), suggesting surgery should be considered in carefully selected patients with G3NENs, especially those with well-differentiated tumors.

Potential evidence of peritoneal recurrence in Stage-II colon cancer from the control arm of CALGB9581.

BACKGROUND: Relapse of early-stage colon cancer (CC) after curative-intent resection occurs. We hypothesized that known risk factors for peritoneal metastases (PM) can define a high-risk state (HRS) that predicts recurrence and mortality. METHODS: CALGB9581 trial patients receiving no adjuvant treatment after stage-II CC resection were included. Positive radial margins, T4 invasion, obstruction/perforation or lymphovascular invasion defined the HRS. Cox proportional hazard models determined association with overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up in 873 included patients was 8.1 years. Five-year OS was 85.8%. HRS+ patients had lower 5-year DFS (68.7 vs. 82.4%, P = 0.003) and OS (75.5 vs. 87.8%, P = 0.001). HRS+ was independently predictive of worse DFS and OS (HR 1.52 and 1.64, P < 0.01). Among recurrences, HRS+ patients showed shorter median OS (3.3 vs. 5.3 years, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HRS criteria identify a cohort of CC patients at high-risk of recurrence and death. Studies of novel surveillance techniques in such patients are warranted.

Recurrent Gastrointestinal Pseudo-obstruction Because of Well-Differentiated Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor.

A 56-year-old man presented with recurrent gastrointestinal obstruction. Computed tomography showed fluid-filled, distended stomach, small intestine, and large intestine. Extensive workup including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, magnetic resonance enterography, push enteroscopy, and video capsule enteroscopy showed no mechanical obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of peripancreatic nodes detected on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography revealed a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor. The lesion showed intense uptake on gallium-68 DOTATOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan. The patient underwent surgical resection of the tumor with resolution of bowel obstruction events. He had elevated pancreatic polypeptide levels, which are known to delay gastric emptying and could explain his symptoms.

Progress in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a heterogeneous and orphan group of neoplasms that vary in their histology, clinical features, prognosis, and management. The treatment of PNETs is highly dependent on the stage at presentation, tumor grade and differentiation, presence of symptoms from hormonal overproduction or from local growth, tumor burden, and rate of progression. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved many novel treatments, which have altered decision making and positively impacted the care and prognosis of these patients. In this review, we focus on the significant progress made in the management of PNETs over the past decade, as well as the active areas of research.

ASO Author Reflections: Endoscopic Management is Reasonable for <2 cm Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Optimal management of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) has not been well-defined, especially for DNETs 1-2 cm in size. Recent studies comparing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and surgical resection demonstrate EMR is safe and effective for these intermediate-sized DNETs. Expert and consensus guidelines could consider updating recommendations to reflect the outcomes of EMR in DNETs and the importance of endoscopic surveillance in these patients to evaluate for local recurrence.

Management of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Surgical versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Management of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) is not standardized, with smaller lesions (< 1-2 cm) generally treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and larger DNETs by surgical resection (SR). This study reviewed how patients were selected for treatment and compared outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DNETs undergoing resection were identified through institutional databases, and clinicopathologic data recorded. χ2 and Wilcoxon tests compared variables. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression tested association with survival. RESULTS: Among 104 patients, 64 underwent EMR and 40 had SR. Patients selected for SR had larger tumor size, younger age, and higher T, N, and M stage. There was no difference in progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between SR and EMR. In 1-2 cm DNETs, there was no difference in PFS between SR and EMR [median not reached (NR), P = 0.1]; however, longer OS was seen in SR (median NR versus 112 months, P = 0.03). In 1-2 cm DNETs, SR patients were more likely to be node-positive and younger. After adjustment for age, resection method did not correlate with survival. Comparison of surgically resected DNETs versus jejunoileal NETs revealed longer PFS (median NR versus 73 months, P < 0.001) and OS (median NR versus 119 months, P = 0.004) DISCUSSION: In 1-2 cm DNETs, there was no difference in survival between EMR and SR after adjustment for age. Recurrences could be salvaged, suggesting that EMR is a reasonable strategy. Compared with jejunoileal NETs, DNETs treated by SR had improved PFS and OS.

Tissue Diagnosis Is Associated With Worse Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biopsy to achieve tissue diagnosis (TD) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risks needle tract seeding. With chest wall and peritoneal recurrences reported, TD could worsen cancer outcomes. We investigated HCC outcomes after TD compared to clinical diagnosis (CD), hypothesizing that TD adversely affects overall survival (OS). METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant User File for liver cancer was reviewed, including patients with nonmetastatic HCC treated with major hepatectomy or transplantation. Clinical diagnosis patients were matched 1:1 to TD patients per propensity score. Survival was examined in the unmatched and matched cohorts. RESULTS: Of 172 283 cases, 16 366 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 60.8 years, 12 100 (73.9%) were male, and 48.4% of patients received hepatectomies. Clinical diagnosis occurred in 70.4% of cases, and 29.6% underwent TD. Cox regression confirmed the diagnostic method as an independent predictor of OS in addition to age, Charlson-Deyo score, grade, delay of surgery, lymphovascular invasion, nodal stage, and procedure type, favoring transplantation over hepatectomy. After propensity matching on these factors, 4251 patients were matched from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with TD had a significantly lower OS than patients with CD (median: 65.5 vs. 85.6 ± 2.7 months, P < .001). The corresponding 5-year survival was lower in the TD group (47.6% vs. 60.9% P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hepatocellular carcinoma patients with preoperative TD had decreased OS compared to CD, which persisted after propensity matching. This study supports avoiding biopsy for HCC whenever possible.

Mismatch Repair Status Correlates with Survival in Young Adults with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Young adults with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may have higher rates of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) than older patients. This study sought to assess patterns of MMR-testing and survival among young adult mCRC patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), hypothesizing that dMMR correlates with worse survival than in MMR-proficient (pMMR) patients. METHODS: Stage-IV colorectal cancers were identified in NCDB (2010-2016). Demographic and clinical features were compared between younger (age ≤ 30) and older mCRC patients and tested for association with overall survival. Stage-IV disease without other recorded metastatic sites defined peritoneal metastasis (PM). Fisher-exact tests compared proportions and Cox models tested association with overall survival. RESULTS: Of 124,587 stage-IV colorectal cancers, 1,123 (0.9%) were in young patients. Young patients were more likely to have mucinous histology, high-grade, rectal primaries, and isolated peritoneal metastases (P < 0.001). Younger patients more often had MMR-testing (29.1 versus 16.6%), with dMMR found at similar rates in young and older patients (21.7 versus 17.1% of those tested, P= 0.4). Despite higher rates of adverse prognostic features, younger patients had better survival (median 20.7 versus 14.8 months, P < 0.001). In MMR-tested patients, dMMR correlated with higher mortality risk compared to pMMR (median 16.6 months versus 25.5 months, P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, grade and MMR-status remained independently associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Median survival was worse with dMMR by 8.9 months compared to pMMR in young adults with mCRC. Despite higher rates of familial syndromes in young patients and recommendations for universal MMR-testing, over 70% of young mCRC patients had no MMR-status recorded.

The Landmark Series: Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Surgical resection is the foundation for treatment of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). Guidelines for surgical management of SBNETs rely on retrospective data, which suggest that primary tumor resection and cytoreduction improve symptoms, prevent future complications, and lengthen survival. In advanced NETs, improvement in progression-free survival has been reported in large, randomized, controlled trials of various medical treatments, including somatostatin analogues, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. This review discusses important studies influencing the management of SBNETs and the limitations of current evidence regarding surgical interventions for SBNETs.