Differential Treatment Effects of Subgroup Analyses in Phase 3 Oncology Trials From 2004 to 2020.

Importance: Subgroup analyses are often performed in oncology to investigate differential treatment effects and may even constitute the basis for regulatory approvals. Current understanding of the features, results, and quality of subgroup analyses is limited. Objective: To evaluate forest plot interpretability and credibility of differential treatment effect claims among oncology trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included randomized phase 3 clinical oncology trials published prior to 2021. Trials were screened from ClinicalTrials.gov. Main Outcomes and Measures: Missing visual elements in forest plots were defined as a missing point estimate or use of a linear x-axis scale for hazard and odds ratios. Multiplicity of testing control was recorded. Differential treatment effect claims were rated using the Instrument for Assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses. Linear and logistic regressions evaluated associations with outcomes. Results: Among 785 trials, 379 studies (48%) enrolling 331 653 patients reported a subgroup analysis. The forest plots of 43% of trials (156 of 363) were missing visual elements impeding interpretability. While 4148 subgroup effects were evaluated, only 1 trial (0.3%) controlled for multiple testing. On average, trials that did not meet the primary end point conducted 2 more subgroup effect tests compared with trials meeting the primary end point (95% CI, 0.59-3.43 tests; P = .006). A total of 101 differential treatment effects were claimed across 15% of trials (55 of 379). Interaction testing was missing in 53% of trials (29 of 55) claiming differential treatment effects. Trials not meeting the primary end point were associated with greater odds of no interaction testing (odds ratio, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.42-15.55, P = .01). The credibility of differential treatment effect claims was rated as low or very low in 93% of cases (94 of 101). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of phase 3 oncology trials, nearly half of trials presented a subgroup analysis in their primary publication. However, forest plots of these subgroup analyses largely lacked essential features for interpretation, and most differential treatment effect claims were not supported. Oncology subgroup analyses should be interpreted with caution, and improvements to the quality of subgroup analyses are needed.

Association of differential censoring with survival and suboptimal control arms among oncology clinical trials.

Differential censoring (DC), referring to censoring imbalance between treatment arms, may bias the interpretation of survival outcomes in clinical trials. In 146 phase 3 oncology trials with statistically significant time-to-event surrogate primary endpoints (PEPs), we evaluated the association between DC in the surrogate PEP, control arm adequacy, and the subsequent statistical significance of OS results. Twenty-four (16%) trials exhibited DC favoring the control arm (ConDC), while 15 (10%) exhibited experimental arm DC (ExpDC). Positive OS was more common in ConDC trials (63%) than trials without DC (37%) or with ExpDC (47%; odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.10-7.20; P=.04). ConDC trials more frequently used suboptimal control arms (46%) compared to 20% without DC and 13% with ExpDC (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.29-10.0; P=.007). The presence of ConDC in trials with surrogate PEPs, especially in those with OS conversion, may indicate an inadequate control arm and should be examined and explained.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Addition of adjuvant capecitabine improves overall survival for patients with breast cancer lacking pathologic complete response to standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combining radiosensitizing capecitabine concurrent with radiation may further improve disease control, although the feasibility and tolerability of chemoradiation in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of this combination. Secondary objectives included the effect of chemoradiation on physician-reported toxicity, patient-reported skin dermatitis, and patient-reported quality of life compared with patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with residual disease following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a prospective single-arm trial and treated with adjuvant capecitabine-based chemoradiation. Feasibility was defined as ≥75% of patients completing chemoradiation as planned. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and the patient-reported radiation-induced skin reaction scale. Quality of life was measured using the RAND Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (90%) completed chemoradiation without interruption or dose reduction. The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation dermatitis was 5% (1 of 20 patients). Patient-reported radiation dermatitis did not show a clinically meaningful difference following chemoradiation (mean increase, 55 points) compared with published reports of patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean increase, 47 points). On the other hand, patient-reported quality of life demonstrated a clinically meaningful decline at the end of chemoradiation (mean, 46; SD, 7) compared with the reference population of patients treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean, 50; SD, 6). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine is feasible and tolerable in patients with breast cancer. Although current studies using adjuvant capecitabine for residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have specified sequential treatment of capecitabine and radiation, these results support the conduct of randomized trials in this setting to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radiation with capecitabine and provide patient-reported toxicity estimates for trial design.

Prevalence and implications of significance testing for baseline covariate imbalance in randomised cancer clinical trials: The Table 1 Fallacy.

BACKGROUND: The 'Table 1 Fallacy' refers to the unsound use of significance testing for comparing the distributions of baseline variables between randomised groups to draw erroneous conclusions about balance or imbalance. We performed a cross-sectional study of the Table 1 Fallacy in phase III oncology trials. METHODS: From ClinicalTrials.gov, 1877 randomised trials were screened. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated predictors of the Table 1 Fallacy. RESULTS: A total of 765 randomised controlled trials involving 553,405 patients were analysed. The Table 1 Fallacy was observed in 25% of trials (188 of 765), with 3% of comparisons deemed significant (59 of 2353), approximating the typical 5% type I error assertion probability. Application of trial-level multiplicity corrections reduced the rate of significant findings to 0.3% (six of 2345 tests). Factors associated with lower odds of the Table 1 Fallacy included industry sponsorship (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.47; multiplicity-corrected P < 0.0001), larger trial size (≥795 versus <280 patients; aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.53; multiplicity-corrected P = 0.0008), and publication in a European versus American journal (aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.13; multiplicity-corrected P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the persistence of the Table 1 Fallacy in contemporary oncology randomised controlled trials, with one of every four trials testing for baseline differences after randomisation. Significance testing is a suboptimal method for identifying unsound randomisation procedures and may encourage misleading inferences. Journal-level enforcement is a possible strategy to help mitigate this fallacy.

Management of chordoma and chondrosarcoma with definitive dose-escalated single-fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: The management of chordoma or chondrosarcoma involving the spine is often challenging due to adjacent critical structures and tumor radioresistance. Spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) has radiobiologic advantages compared with conventional radiotherapy, though there is limited evidence on SSRS in this population. We sought to characterize the long-term local control (LC) of patients treated with SSRS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated with dose-escalated SSRS, defined as 24 Gy in 1 fraction to the gross tumor volume. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by Kaplan-Meier functions. Competing risk analysis using the cause-specific hazard function estimated LC time. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, including 12 with chordoma and 3 with chondrosarcoma, with 22 lesions were included. SSRS intent was definitive, single-modality in 95% of cases (N = 21) and post-operative in 1 case (5%). After a median censored follow-up time of 5 years (IQR 4 to 8 years), median LC time was not reached (IQR 8 years to not reached), with LC rates of 100%, 100%, and 90% at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. The median OS was 8 years (IQR 3 years to not reached). Late grade 3 toxicity occurred after 23% of treatments (N = 5, fracture), all of which were managed successfully with stabilization. CONCLUSION: Definitive dose-escalated SSRS to 24 Gy in 1 fraction appears to be a safe and effective treatment for achieving durable local control in chordoma or chondrosarcoma involving the spine, and may hold particular importance as a low-morbidity alternative to surgery in selected cases.

Challenges, Complexities, and Considerations in the Design and Interpretation of Late-Phase Oncology Trials.

Optimal management of cancer patients relies heavily on late-phase oncology randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive understanding of the key considerations in designing and interpreting late-phase trials is crucial for improving subsequent trial design, execution, and clinical decision-making. In this review, we explore important aspects of late-phase oncology trial design. We begin by examining the selection of primary endpoints, including the advantages and disadvantages of using surrogate endpoints. We address the challenges involved in assessing tumor progression and discuss strategies to mitigate bias. We define informative censoring bias and its impact on trial results, including illustrative examples of scenarios that may lead to informative censoring. We highlight the traditional roles of the log-rank test and hazard ratio in survival analyses, along with their limitations in the presence of nonproportional hazards as well as an introduction to alternative survival estimands, such as restricted mean survival time or MaxCombo. We emphasize the distinctions between the design and interpretation of superiority and noninferiority trials, and compare Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches. Finally, we discuss appropriate utilization of phase II and phase III trial results in shaping clinical management recommendations and evaluate the inherent risks and benefits associated with relying on phase II data for treatment decisions.

Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research.

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with cancer are treated with local therapy (LT), the proportion of late-phase clinical trials investigating local therapeutic interventions is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion, characteristics, and trends of phase 3 cancer clinical trials assessing the therapeutic value of LT over time. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of interventional randomized controlled trials in oncology published from 2002 through 2020 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends and characteristics of LT trials were compared to all other trials. RESULTS: Of 1877 trials screened, 794 trials enrolling 584,347 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 trials (3%) included a primary randomization assessing LT compared with 767 trials (97%) investigating systemic therapy or supportive care. Annual increase in the number of LT trials (slope [m] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.39; p < .001) was outpaced by the increase of trials testing systemic therapy or supportive care (m = 7.57; 95% CI, 6.03-9.11; p < .001). LT trials were more often sponsored by cooperative groups (22 of 27 [81%] vs. 211 of 767 [28%]; p < .001) and less often sponsored by industry (5 of 27 [19%] vs. 609 of 767 [79%]; p < .001). LT trials were more likely to use overall survival as primary end point compared to other trials (13 of 27 [48%] vs. 199 of 767 [26%]; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary late-phase oncology research, LT trials are increasingly under-represented, under-funded, and evaluate more challenging end points compared to other modalities. These findings strongly argue for greater resource allocation and funding mechanisms for LT clinical trials. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Most people who have cancer receive treatments directed at the site of their cancer, such as surgery or radiation. We do not know, however, how many trials test surgery or radiation compared to drug treatments (that go all over the body). We reviewed trials testing the most researched strategies (phase 3) completed between 2002 and 2020. Only 27 trials tested local treatments like surgery or radiation compared to 767 trials testing other treatments. Our study has important implications for funding research and understanding cancer research priorities.

Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Intermittent Hormone Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The EXTEND Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit with up-front hormone therapy in addition to established synergy between hormone therapy and radiation, the addition of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to hormone therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer, to date, has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective: To determine in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer whether the addition of MDT to intermittent hormone therapy improves oncologic outcomes and preserves time with eugonadal testosterone compared with intermittent hormone therapy alone. Design, Setting, Participants: The External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease (EXTEND) trial is a phase 2, basket randomized clinical trial for multiple solid tumors testing the addition of MDT to standard-of-care systemic therapy. Men aged 18 years or older with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had 5 or fewer metastases and were treated with hormone therapy for 2 or more months were enrolled to the prostate intermittent hormone therapy basket at multicenter tertiary cancer centers from September 2018 to November 2020. The cutoff date for the primary analysis was January 7, 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT, consisting of definitive radiation therapy to all sites of disease and intermittent hormone therapy (combined therapy arm; n = 43) or to hormone therapy only (n = 44). A planned break in hormone therapy occurred 6 months after enrollment, after which hormone therapy was withheld until progression. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was disease progression, defined as death or radiographic, clinical, or biochemical progression. A key predefined secondary end point was eugonadal progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from achieving a eugonadal testosterone level (≥150 ng/dL; to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 0.0347) until progression. Exploratory measures included quality of life and systemic immune evaluation using flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing. Results: The study included 87 men (median age, 67 years [IQR, 63-72 years]). Median follow-up was 22.0 months (range, 11.6-39.2 months). Progression-free survival was improved in the combined therapy arm (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only arm (median, 15.8 months; 95% CI, 13.6-21.2 months) (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P < .001). Eugonadal PFS was also improved with MDT (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only (6.1 months; 95% CI, 3.7 months to not estimable) (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; P = .03). Flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing demonstrated increased markers of T-cell activation, proliferation, and clonal expansion limited to the combined therapy arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, PFS and eugonadal PFS were significantly improved with combination treatment compared with hormone treatment only in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Combination of MDT with intermittent hormone therapy may allow for excellent disease control while facilitating prolonged eugonadal testosterone intervals. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03599765.

Definitive Local Consolidative Therapy for Oligometastatic Solid Tumors: Results From the Lead-in Phase of the Randomized Basket Trial EXTEND.

PURPOSE: The benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastasis across histologies remains uncertain. EXTernal beam radiation to Eliminate Nominal metastatic Disease (EXTEND; NCT03599765) is a randomized phase 2 basket trial evaluating the effectiveness of LCT for oligometastatic solid tumors. We report here the prospective results of the single-arm "lead-in" phase intended to identify histologies most likely to accrue to histology-specific endpoints in the randomized phase. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible histologies included colorectal, sarcoma, lung, head and neck, ovarian, renal, melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, cervix/uterine, breast, and hepatobiliary. Patients received LCT to all sites of active metastatic disease and primary/regional disease (as applicable) plus standard-of-care systemic therapy or observation. The primary endpoint in EXTEND was progression-free survival (PFS), and the primary endpoint of the lead-phase was histology-specific accrual feasibility. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: From August 2018 through January 2019, 50 patients were enrolled and 49 received definitive LCT. Prostate, breast, and kidney were the highest enrolling histologies and identified for independent accrual in the randomization phase. Most patients (73%) had 1 or 2 metastases, most often in lung or bone (79%), and received ablative radiation (62%). Median follow-up for censored patients was 38 months (range, 16-42 months). Median PFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9-24), 3-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%), and local control rate was 98% (93 of 95 tumors). Two patients (4%) had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 toxic effects related to LCT; no patient had grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective lead-in phase of the EXTEND basket trial demonstrated feasible accrual, encouraging PFS, and low rates of severe toxic effects at mature follow-up. The randomized phase is ongoing with histology-based baskets that will provide histology-specific evidence for LCT in oligometastatic disease.

Noninvasive Capsulotomy for Refractory Depression by Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Effective treatment options for refractory depression are needed. Recent advancements permit both precise ablative radiation and functional neurologic connectome analysis using standard magnetic resonance imaging. We combined these innovations to perform stereotactic radiosurgical capsulotomy for the treatment of medically refractory major depressive disorder and study connectome response using a novel tractography-based approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with medically refractory depression were enrolled on a prospective pilot single-arm observational trial from 2020 to 2021 at a single academic tertiary referral center. Bilateral ablation of the anterior limb of the internal capsule was accomplished by mask-based linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Beck's Depression Inventory measured efficacy. Montreal Cognitive Assessment evaluated cognition. RESULTS: Three patients were enrolled. Depression burden was improved by 88% at 12-month follow-up and by 55% at 18-month follow-up for patient 1 and 2, respectively. Patient 1 discontinued ketamine therapy, and patient 2 discontinued electroconvulsive therapy. Patient 3 reported global improvement in symptoms and function at 3 months. All 3 patients had reduction or resolution of suicidal ideation. No patient experienced cognitive decline or neurologic toxicity, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment score, as well as subjective patient-reported evaluations of concentration and attention, were superior after treatment. Tractography confirmed intended disruption of the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical loop with structural reorganization in the connectome. Connectome change was consistent between patients. Observed increases in caudate and putamen connectivity and decreases in thalamic connectivity may explain improved concentration, attention, and depression. The diversity and magnitude of connectome change may correlate with degree of clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: In 3 patients with refractory depression, radiosurgical capsulotomy significantly reduced the burden of depression. Functional connectome reorganization offers neurobiological evidence to support further investigations of the role of radiosurgery in depression.

Comparative Analysis of Recidivism After Endoscopic and Microscopic-Based Cholesteatoma Resection.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To analyze outcomes of cholesteatoma resection utilizing postauricular microscopic and endoscopic ear surgery (EES) approaches.2) To analyze predictors of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy-five adult and pediatric patients with cholesteatoma (2012-2017). INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent surgical resection of cholesteatoma with EES (n = 122) and microscopic (n = 253) approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Residual cholesteatoma, recurrent cholesteatoma, second-look procedures. RESULTS: The endoscopic cohort included significantly more pediatric cases (p = 0.0008). There was no difference in laterality, gender distribution, congenital or acquired cholesteatoma, and revision cases between the cohorts. Out of 122 EES cases, 16 (13%) developed residual disease and 9 (7%) developed recurrent disease. Of 253 microscopic cases 16 (6%) developed residual disease while 11 (4%) developed recurrent disease. Second look procedures were more commonly used in EES cohort (50 vs 18%). Single predictor analysis revealed 12 predictors for residual disease and 5 for recurrent disease. Multivariable model identified pediatric case distribution and higher disease stage to be significant predictors for both residual (p = 0.04, 0.007) and recurrent disease (p = 0.02, 0.01). EES approach was associated with a weak significance for residual disease (p = 0.049) but not recurrent disease (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: EES approach for cholesteatoma resection seems to perform similarly to microscopic approach with no difference in rates of recurrent disease. However, it is associated with a higher rate of residual disease; this may be a reflection of a greater rate of second look procedures done in this group.

Predictors of Recurrence After Sub-total or Near-total Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: Importance of Tumor Volume and Ventral Extension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictors of remnant tumor regrowth and need for salvage therapy after less than gross total resection (GTR) of vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary neurotologic referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent VS resection between 2008 and 2019 either with GTR, near total resection (NTR), and subtotal resection (STR). INTERVENTIONS: Microsurgical resection, salvage radiosurgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regrowth free interval, salvage free interval, tumor doubling rate. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty five cases (GTR = 236, NTR = 77, and STR = 71) from 2008 to 2019 were included. STR cohort had much larger and complex tumors with significant differences in tumor volume, ventral extension and brainstem compression (p  < 0.001). On single predictor analysis, tumor volume, ventral extension, brainstem compression as well as STR strategy was associated with significant increased risk of regrowth and need for salvage therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed STR strategy as significant predictor of regrowth (hazard ratio 3.79, p  < 0.0005). Absolute remnant volume and extent of resection (EOR) did not predict regrowth. A small proportion of cases (NTR = 4%, STR = 15%) eventually needed salvage radiosurgery with excellent ultimate local tumor control with no known recurrence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgical strategy employing NTR or STR can be employed safely in large and complex VS. While there is increased risk of regrowth in the STR cohort, excellent local control can be achieved with appropriate use of salvage radiosurgery. No disceret radiologic or operative predictors of regrowth were identified.

Noninvasive Thalamotomy for Refractory Tremor by Frameless Radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether a more widely accessible, noninvasive, frameless approach to radiosurgical thalamotomy would improve objective measures of refractory essential or parkinsonian tremor without added toxicity compared with reports of frame-based radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-arm pilot observational prospective trial of adult patients with essential or parkinsonian tremor from 2013 to 2019 and report results at 1-year follow-up. Patients were treated with frameless unilateral radiosurgical ablation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus to a maximum dose of 160 Gy. Treatment response was measured by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) tremor rating scale and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor or Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire obtained before treatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, including 23 with essential tremor and 10 with Parkinson's disease, were enrolled. Overall treatment response rate per FTM was 83% (15 of 18) at 6 months. There was a marked improvement in tremor, with an average total FTM reduction of 21% at 3 months (from 46 to 30 points; P = .003) and 41% at 6 months (from 46 to 24 points; P = .001). At 6 months, functional decline had regressed by 54% (from 15 to 7 points; P = .001). Quality of life improved by 57% (P = .001) at 6 months in patients with essential tremor, and patients with Parkinson's disease had unchanged quality of life. At 1-year follow-up, grade 2 neurologic adverse events were observed in 6% (2 of 33) of patients without any grade ≥ 3 events. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive, frameless radiosurgical thalamotomy may be a feasible treatment for patients with refractory tremor and demonstrates short-term safety at 1-year follow-up. This pilot study provides promising preliminary descriptions of efficacy, and definitive estimates of long-term safety and benefit require further study with longer follow-up.

Effects of cone versus multi-leaf collimation on dosimetry and neurotoxicity in patients with small arteriovenous malformations treated by stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is delivered with cone or multileaf collimators (MLCs), and favorable dosimetry is associated with reduced radionecrosis in normal brain tissue. This study aims to determine whether cones or MLCs has better dosimetric characteristics, to predict differences in toxicity. METHODS: All patients treated for AVMs using LINAC SRS from 2003-2017 were examined retrospectively. Demographic data, volumes of normal tissue exposed to 12Gy (V12Gy[cc]) and 4Gy (V4Gy[cc]), maximal dose, and dose gradient were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate relationships between collimator type, dosimetric parameters, and toxicity. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for AVM size. RESULTS: Compared to MLC, cones were independently associated with reduced V12Gy[cc] after propensity score matching (p=0.008) and reduced neurotoxicity (p=0.016). Higher V12Gy[cc] (p=0.0008) and V4Gy[cc] (p=0.002) were associated with increased neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Treating AVMs with cone-based SRS over MLC-based SRS may improve dosimetry and reduce toxicities.

The Influence of Extent of Resection and Tumor Morphology on Facial Nerve Outcomes Following Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence extent of resection and tumor characteristics on facial nerve (FN) outcomes following microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients who underwent VS microsurgical resection. INTERVENTIONS: Microsurgical VS resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: House-Brackmann (HB) scores postoperatively. Good FN function was defined as HB grade I and II and poor FN function was defined as HB grade III and VI. Gross total resection (GTR) versus subtotal resection (STR). Propensity-score matching was used in subset analysis to balance tumor volume between the surgical cohorts, followed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (18%) underwent STR and 314 patients (82%) underwent GTR. Two hundred fourteen patients (63%) had good FN function at 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively, and 80% had good FN function at 1 year. In single predictor analysis, STR did not influence FN function at 2 to 3 weeks (p = 0.65). In propensity-score matched subset analysis (N = 178), patients with STR were less likely to have poor FN function at 2 to 3 weeks (p = 0.02) independent of tumor volume (p = 0.004), but there was no correlation between STR and FN function at 1 year (p = 0.09). Ventral extension of tumor relative to the internal auditory canal plane was associated with poor FN outcomes at 2 to 3 weeks (p = 0.0001) and 1-year postop (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When accounting for tumor volume, STR is protective in immediate postoperative FN function compared to GTR. Ventral extension of the tumor is a clinical predictor of long-term FN outcomes.

Progressive Vestibular Schwannoma following Subtotal or Near-Total Resection: Dose-Escalated versus Standard-Dose Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Objective Local failure of incompletely resected vestibular schwannoma (VS) following salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using standard doses of 12 to 13 Gy is common. We hypothesized that dose-escalated SRS, corrected for biologically effective dose, would have superior local control of high-grade VS progressing after subtotal or near-total resection compared with standard-dose SRS. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic referral center. Participants Adult patients treated with linear accelerator-based SRS for progressive VS following subtotal or near-total resection. Main Outcome Measures Dose-escalated SRS was defined by a biologically effective dose exceeding a single-fraction 13-Gy regimen. Study outcomes were local control and neurologic sequelae of SRS. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of study outcomes. Results A total of 18 patients with progressive disease following subtotal (71%) and near-total (39%) resection of Koos grade IV disease (94%) were enrolled. Of the 18 patients, 7 were treated with dose-escalated SRS and 11 with standard-dose SRS. Over a median follow-up of 32 months after SRS, local control was 100% in the dose-escalated cohort and 91% in the standard-dose cohort ( p = 0.95). Neurologic sequelae occurred in 28% of patients, including 60% of dose-escalated cohort and 40% of the standard-dose cohort ( p = 0.12), although permanent neurologic sequelae were low at 6%. Conclusions Dose-escalated SRS has similar local control of recurrent VS following progression after subtotal or near-total resection and does not appear to have higher neurologic sequalae. Larger studies are needed.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma.

Objectives Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in two to five fractions may offer patients with large nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) with chiasm involvement a safe and effective treatment over a single week. However, little has been reported regarding this novel approach. Design We compared the feasibility, outcomes, and toxicity of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and HSRT. Setting This study was conducted at a tertiary academic referral center. Participants After approval by the institutional review board, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at our institution with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and HSRT for NFPA. Selection for SRS or HSRT was based on clinicopathologic factors including tumor size and cavernous sinus invasion at the discretion of the treating physician. Main Outcome Measures Local control, endocrinopathy, and radiation-associated toxicity were evaluated by binary logistic regression and Cox's proportional hazards regression. Results A total of 45 patients with mean follow-up of 5 years were enrolled including 26 patients treated by HSRT with mean follow-up of 3 years and 19 patients treated by SRS with median follow-up of 6 years. Clinicopathologic characteristics were balanced between cohorts. Local failure at last follow-up was 5% in the SRS cohort and 8% in the HSRT cohort, and rates of post-SRS endocrinopathy were similar between each cohort. Late complications including radionecrosis, visual deficit, and secondary malignancy were minimal in either cohort. Conclusions HSRT is an appropriate treatment strategy for patients with NFPAs, particularly for optic pathway preservation in the setting of large tumors with chiasm involvement. Further studies are needed to optimize fractionated approaches and patient selection.

Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life.

PURPOSE: Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Toxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus-positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively. CONCLUSION: Therefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.

Diameter-Based Volumetric Models May Inadequately Calculate Jugular Paraganglioma Volume Following Sub-Total Resection.

BACKGROUND: As gross total resection of jugular paragangliomas (JPs) may result in cranial nerve deficits, JPs are increasingly managed with subtotal resection (STR) with postoperative radiological monitoring. However, the validity of commonly used diameter-based models that calculate postoperative volume to determine residual tumor growth is dubious. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of these models compared to manual volumetric slice-by-slice segmentation. METHODS: A senior neuroradiologist measured volumes via slice-by-slice segmentation of JPs pre- and postoperatively from patients who underwent STR from 2007 to 2019. Volumes from three linear-based models were calculated. Models with absolute percent error (APE) > 20% were considered unsatisfactory based on a common volumetric definition for residual growth. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate reproducibility, and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test evaluated model bias. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. Median postoperative APE exceeded the established 20% threshold for each of the volumetric models as cuboidal, ellipsoidal, and spherical model APE were 63%, 28%, and 27%, respectively. The postoperative cuboidal model had significant systematic bias overestimating volume (p = 0.002) whereas the postoperative ellipsoidal and spherical models lacked systematic bias (p = 0.11 and p = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Cuboidal, ellipsoidal, and spherical models do not provide accurate assessments of postoperative JP tumor volume and may result in salvage therapies that are unnecessary or inappropriately withheld due to inaccurate assessment of residual tumor growth. While more time-consuming, slice-by-slice segmentation by an experienced neuroradiologist provides a substantially more accurate and precise measurement of tumor volume that may optimize clinical management.