Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci ; 58: 467-489, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507281

RESUMO

Anhedonia - the reduced ability to experience or respond to pleasure - is an important symptom domain for many psychiatric disorders. It is particularly relevant to depression and other mood disorders and it is a diagnostic criterion of a major depressive episode. Developing safe and effective pharmacological interventions for anhedonia is a critical public health need. The current chapter will review the state of the field with respect to both the efficacy of currently available pharmacotherapies for anhedonia and the recent clinical research focusing on new brain targets, including the kappa-opioid receptor and the KCNQ2/3 receptors. The evidence for anti-anhedonic effects of ketamine and psychedelic agents will be reviewed, as well.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Ketamina , Anedonia , Encéfalo , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ketamina/farmacologia , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Recompensa
2.
Innov Pharm ; 12(4)2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36033128

RESUMO

Background: Postoperative ileus is a transient cessation of bowel motility, occurring after bowel resection, characterized by abdominal distension and pain, nausea, vomiting, and an accumulation of gas/fluids in the bowel. It is associated with a greater incidence of postoperative morbidity and increased length of stay or readmission. Alvimopan, a novel peripheral mu receptor antagonist, is indicated for preventing postoperative ileus in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery or bowel resection. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of alvimopan use in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Objective: To assess alvimopan use's impact in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 84 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures that received alvimopan (September 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018) and compared to patients that did not receive alvimopan (May 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018, due to a national shortage of the medication). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative ileus. Secondary outcomes included rate of 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), postoperative opioid and laxative use, time to initiation of oral diet, and return of bowel function (ROBF) as demonstrated by recorded bowel movement. Results: There was no statistical difference observed in primary outcome of postoperative ileus between alvimopan and no alvimopan groups (2.7% vs 4.3%, p=1). Secondary outcomes such as length of stay (5.4 days vs 5.4 days, p=0.49), length of postoperative stay (5 vs 4.9, p=0.44), days to oral diet (0.9 vs 0.4, p=0.16), time to BM (1.8 vs 2.2, p=0.32), and 30-day readmission were also similar between the two groups. Conclusion: The similar outcome profiles in all primary and secondary outcomes do not support the use of alvimopan in the setting of laparoscopic intra-abdominal surgery.

3.
Innov Pharm ; 12(3)2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35601571

RESUMO

Purpose: To assess the impact of therapeutic dose versus prophylactic dose anticoagulation regimens on outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive mechanically ventilated adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and initiated on anticoagulation from February 1 st to May 31 st , 2020. The primary endpoint was 14-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, major bleeding, and new thromboembolic event. Results: Of the 121 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, 33 in the therapeutic-dose group and 34 patients in the prophylactic-dose group were included in the final analysis. The therapeutic-dose group had a decreased 14-day mortality compared to the prophylaxis dose group (9.1% vs 41.2%, p=0.004). In addition, 30-day mortality was also lower in the therapeutic anticoagulation group (24.2% vs. 52.9%, p=0.024). A longer hospital LOS (45.7 vs 26 days, p=0.003) and duration of mechanical ventilation (33.9 vs 13.3 days, p<0.001) were observed in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation in comparison to the prophylaxis dosing group. A higher rate of major bleeding was observed in patients who received therapeutic anticoagulation. Conclusion: In this analysis of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the ICU, therapeutic dose anticoagulation was associated with a significantly lower 14-day mortality, but increased bleeding.

4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32601164

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially when caused by Gram-negative or fungal pathogens. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of fast identification-antimicrobial susceptibility testing (ID/AST) with the Accelerate Pheno system (AXDX) from May 2018 to December 2018 on antibiotic therapy and patient outcomes. A pre-post quasiexperimental study of 200 patients (100 pre-AXDX implementation and 100 post-AXDX implementation) was conducted. The primary endpoints measured were time to first antibiotic intervention, time to most targeted antibiotic therapy, and 14-day hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), antibiotic intensity score at 96 h, and 30-day readmission rates. Of 100 patients with Gram-negative bacteremia or candidemia in each cohort, 84 in the preimplementation group and 89 in the AXDX group met all inclusion criteria. The AXDX group had a decreased time to first antibiotic intervention (26.3 versus 8.0, P = 0.003), hours to most targeted therapy (14.4 versus 9, P = 0.03), hospital LOS (6 versus 8, P = 0.002), and average antibiotic intensity score at 96 h (16 versus 12, P = 0.002). Both groups had a comparable 14-day mortality (0% versus 3.6%, P = 0.11). In this analysis of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia or candidemia, fast ID/AST implementation was associated with decreased hospital LOS, decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, shortened time to targeted therapy, and an improved utilization of antibiotics within the first 96 h of therapy.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Candidemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Farmacêuticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA