Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 2024 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39278980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The probiotic MIYAIRI 588 can potentially improve the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI. However, the impact of other probiotics on ICI-treatment efficacy remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to clarify the association between BIO-three use and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had received ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy. Concomitant therapy with probiotic bacteria was defined as receiving it within 180 days before ICI therapy. RESULTS: Here, 289 patients were enrolled, including 23 (8.0%) receiving BIO-three. In the multivariable analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving BIO-three tended to be longer than those of patients not receiving probiotic therapy (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.30; p = 0.33; OS, HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.37-1.28; p = 0.24). After propensity score matching with weighted adjustment, patients receiving BIO-three tended to have prolonged PFS (median PFS [range] 7.6 months [2.6-17.4] vs 3.2 months [1.6-7.0]; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25-1.12; p = 0.09) and OS (median OS [range] 25.6 months [10.8-not reached] vs 10.9 months [7.3-not reached]; HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24-1.36; p = 0.20) than those not receiving probiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the prognostic impact of concomitant BIO-three use in patients with advanced NSCLC on ICI treatment.

2.
Anticancer Res ; 42(12): 6019-6026, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456132

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lenvatinib (LEN) has been approved as an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, in some patients, LEN does not provide adequate therapeutic benefits. In this study, we examined the factors that affect the therapeutic response to LEN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved patients with HCC who received LEN therapy at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital. We used the delivered dose intensity to body surface area ratio for 60 days (2M-DBR) as an index of the therapeutic response. RESULTS: This study included 83 patients divided into two groups, the high 2M-DBR group (47 patients, 56.7%) and low 2M-DBR group (36 patients, 43.4%). Univariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh class, C-reactive protein, and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were significant factors for high 2M-DBR. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a PNI>39.15 was significantly associated with high 2M-DBR. CONCLUSION: A PNI cut-off value of less than 39.15 may indicate a poor response to LEN therapy. PNI, an easy, simple, and inexpensive tool, may be useful in identifying patients in need of early intervention.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação Nutricional , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Int J Med Sci ; 16(9): 1283-1286, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588194

RESUMO

The use of semi-solid enteral nutrients plays an extremely important role in accurate nutrition management. In the present study, we compared the pharmacokinetic profile of orally administered carbamazepine (CBZ) in rats treated with liquid RACOL®, semi-solid RACOL®, and HINE E-gel®, which are enteral nutrients marketed in Japan. Since liquid and semi-solid formulations are both marketed in Japan for RACOL®, liquid RACOL® was orally administered to control rats. The serum concentration of CBZ at each sampling point was lower in the semi-solid RACOL®-treated group than in the liquid RACOL®-treated group. No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBZ between the semi-solid RACOL®-treated and HINE E-gel®-treated groups. Regarding pharmacokinetic parameters, the impact of the area under the curve (AUC0→5h) was the liquid RACOL® group > the semi-solid RACOL® group ≈ the HINE E-gel® group. Therefore, we concluded that serum concentrations of CBZ were lower when concurrently treating with semi-solid enteral nutrients than when simultaneously processing liquid enteral nutrients.


Assuntos
Carbamazepina/farmacocinética , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Alimentos Formulados , Administração Oral , Animais , Área Sob a Curva , Carbamazepina/administração & dosagem , Carbamazepina/sangue , Masculino , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA