Low back pain characteristics in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Early-stage spondylolysis (ESS) is a common cause of acute low back pain (LBP) in adolescents. When treating patients with ESS, early diagnosis is essential, yet difficult without magnetic resonance imaging. This study evaluates a self-reported questionnaire for detecting ESS. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 69 adolescents (≤ 18 years old) with acute LBP (≤ 1 month) with plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging and a questionnaire including the following parameters: exercise frequency per week, daily training time, the necessity for stopping sports activity, pain-producing situations, pain quality, pain response to hyperextension or hyperflexion, pain location, and pain extent. Patients with obvious pathological findings other than ESS (e.g., disk herniation or infection) were excluded. The correlation of each question and gender, regarding ESS was determined, to evaluate the value of the originally developed questionnaire. RESULTS: 24 out of 69 patients were diagnosed with ESS (ESS group), with a mean age of 13.9 years old and 21 males and 3 females in the group. 45 patients had NS-LBP, with a mean age of 14.6 years old, and 28 males and 17 females in the group. Correlation analyses showed weak associations between ESS and higher frequency of exercise per week, longer training time per day, and pain-producing situations. There was also a moderate association between ESS and male gender. CONCLUSION: Exercise frequency, training time, pain-provoking situations, and gender could be important factors to detect ESS within this questionnaire.

Lateral bending differentiates early-stage spondylolysis from nonspecific low back pain in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Early-stage spondylolysis (ESS) is one of the common causes of acute low back pain (LBP) in adolescents. Although accurate diagnosis of ESS is important for providing appropriate treatment, differentiating ESS from other low back disorders is difficult by physical signs alone. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the most common characteristic, namely, motion-provoking LBP, in patients with ESS. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. METHOD: We included and categorized adolescents (n = 112; age, <18 years) with acute LBP (<1 month) into the ESS (n = 71) and nonspecific LBP (NS-LBP) (n = 41) groups based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and degree of pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS) provoked by hyperextension, hyperflexion, right and left rotations, and lateral bending in standing position.; the value were compared between the 2 groups. A cut-off value of significance was obtained using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The mean scores for VAS and ODI and NRS of each test were as follows (ESS/NS-LBP): VAS, 6.5/6.0; ODI, 19.7/24.6; hyperextension, 4.1/4.1; hyperflexion, 2.4/3.0; rotation, 2.1/2.2; and lateral bending, 2.9/2.2. The ESS group had a significantly greater number of LBP cases provoked by lateral bending than the NS-LBP group. A cut-off lateral bending of 3.5 yielded a diagnosis of ESS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that lateral bending is the greatest motion-provoking characteristic of LBP in patients with ESS.

Utility of Physical Examination Findings for Predicting Low-Back Pain in Adolescent Patients with Early-Stage Spondylolysis: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to elucidate low-back pain (LBP) characteristics, i.e., its qualities, extent, and location, in patients with early-stage spondylolysis (ESS). METHODS: We recruited patients (≤18 years old) who presented with acute LBP lasting up to 1 month. Patients were divided into ESS and nonspecific LBP (NS-LBP) groups based on their magnetic resonance imaging findings; patients showing no pathological findings that might explain the cause of LBP were classified as NS-LBP. All patients were evaluated using the following tests: hyperextension and hyperflexion (pain provocation tests in a standing position), pain quality (sharp/dull), pain extent (fingertip-sized area/palm-sized area), and pain location (left and/or right pain in side [side]/central pain [center]). We have also compared outcomes between the ESS and NS-LBP groups in terms of gender and physical symptoms. RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 53 were determined to have ESS (ESS group: mean age: 14.3 years old; 43 males/10 females), whereas 48 had no pathological findings explaining the LBP origin [NS-LBP group (mean age, 14.4 years old; 31 males/17 females)]. Chi-squared test has identified gender (male), a negative result on hyperflexion test, pain extent (fingertip-sized area), and pain location (side) to be significantly associated with ESS. Among these, regression analysis revealed that male gender and LBP located on the side were significantly associated with ESS (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the hyperextension test is generally considered useful for ESS, we demonstrated that its association is not deemed significant. Our results indicate that male gender, a negative result of the hyperflexion test, fingertip-sized pain area, and LBP on the side may be specific characteristics of ESS. Of these physical signs, male gender and LBP located on the side are characteristic factors suggesting ESS presence.

Characteristics of low back pain in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis evaluated using a detailed visual analogue scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the characteristics of low back pain (LBP) in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis (ESS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ESS is a common cause of acute LBP in adolescents. When treating patients with ESS, early diagnosis is important; however, early diagnosis is difficult without magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Adolescent patients (n = 77) with acute LBP showing no pathological findings on plain radiography were included (<1 m after onset). Patients were divided into ESS and nonspecific LBP (NS-LBP) groups by conducting magnetic resonance imaging; patients showing no pathological findings that explain the cause of LBP were classified as NS-LBP. LBP was evaluated using a traditional visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10 cm), Oswestry Disability Index, and a detailed VAS scoring system in which pain is independently evaluated in 3 different postural situations (in motion, standing, and sitting); the values were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of 77 patients, 41 (mean age: 14.6 yr; 33 adolescent boys/8 adolescent girls) had ESS and 36 (mean age: 14.3 yr; 20 adolescent boys/16 adolescent girls) were considered to have NS-LBP. Respective traditional VAS and Oswestry Disability Index scores were 4.9, 16.1 in the ESS group, and 6.2, 26.3 in the NS-LBP group. Both scores were significantly higher in the NS-LBP group. The results of the detailed VAS revealed that the ESS group showed significantly greater pain intensity while in motion than while standing or sitting (4.2, 2.0, and 2.0, respectively), whereas the NS-LBP group showed similar pain intensities in all 3 postural situations (5.3, 4.0, and 4.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that LBP characteristics may provide important information for distinguishing ESS from other low back disorders. Because early diagnosis is essential for the treatment of ESS, MRI examination is recommended for patients showing severe pain in motion, but less pain when standing or sitting.