The effect of donor-recipient sex matches on lung transplant survival: An analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

Objective: To investigate the impact of donor-recipient (DR) sex matches on survival after lung transplantation while controlling for size difference in the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 27,423 lung transplant recipients who were reported in the UNOS database (January 2005-March 2020). Patients were divided into groups based on their respective DR sex match: male to male (MM), male to female (MF), female to female, (FF), and female to male (FM). Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression with log-rank tests were used to assess 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival. We also modeled survival for each group after controlling for size-related variables via the Cox regression. Results: Kaplan-Meier curves showed overall significance at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year end points (P < .0001). Estimated median survival time based on Kaplan-Meier analysis were 6.41 ± 0.15, 6.13 ± 0.18, 5.86 ± 0.10, and 5.37 ± 0.17 years for FF, MF, MM, and FM, respectively (P < .0001). After we controlled for size differences, FF had statistically significantly longer 5- and 10-year survival than all other cohorts. MF also had statistically significantly longer 5- and 10-year survival than FM. Conclusions: When variables associated with size were controlled for, FF had improved survival than other DR groups. A female recipient may experience longer survival with a female donor's lungs versus a male donor's lungs of similar size.

A single-center analysis of lung transplantation outcomes in recipients aged 70 or older.

OBJECTIVES: As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT center, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 years old versus <70 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 years old versus <70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double lung transplant). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and two sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. RESULTS: 988 LTs were performed at our center over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients <70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (p < 0.0001), sex (p = 0.003), and disease etiology (p < 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double lung transplant compared to younger patients (p < 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (p = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% versus 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.

Increased-risk versus standard-risk donation in lung transplantation: A United Network of Organ Sharing analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Donors with characteristics that increase risk of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV transmission are deemed increased-risk donors (IRDs) per Public Health Service guidelines. Compared with organs from standard-risk donors (SRDs), IRD organs are more frequently declined. We sought to investigate the outcomes of IRD lung transplant recipients following the 2013 guideline change. METHODS: We retrospectively identified lung transplant recipients using the United Network of Organ Sharing registry (February 2014 to March 2020). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention risk status of the donor: SRD or IRD. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared across groups. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify variables associated with survival outcome. RESULTS: We identified 13,205 lung transplant recipients, 9963 who received allografts from SRDs and 3242 who received allografts from IRDs. In both groups, most donors were White, male, and <30 years old. IRDs demonstrated greater rates of heavy alcohol, cigarette, and cocaine use. SRDs had greater rates of cancer, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and diabetes. Survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in 90-day, 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year survival outcome between SRD and IRD recipients (P = .34, P = .67, P = .40, P = .52, respectively). Cox regression demonstrated that double-lung transplants were associated with 13% decreased mortality risk compared with single-lung (P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: IRD and SRD recipients demonstrated equivalent survival outcomes. Our study suggests that IRDs offer a safe approach to expand the donor pool and increase availability of lungs for transplantation.

Lung transplant survival with past and concomitant cardiac revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is common among lung transplant (LTx) candidates and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease who had prior or perioperative revascularization remain a topic of conversation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from Feb, 2012 to Aug, 2021 at a single center was performed (n = 880). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) those who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, (2) those who received preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, (3) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting during transplantation, and (4) those who had lung transplantation without revascularization. Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes using STATA Inc. A p value< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Most patients receiving LTx were male and white. Pump type (p = 0.810), total ischemic time (p = 0.994), warm ischemic time (p = 0.479), length of stay (p = 0.751), and lung allocation score (p = 0.332) were not significantly different between the four groups. The no revascularization group was younger than the other groups (p<0.01). The diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis was predominant in all groups except the no revascularization group. The pre-coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher portion of single LTx procedures (p = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significantly different survival rates after post-LTx between the groups (p = 0.471). Cox Regression analysis showed diagnosis significantly impacted survival rates (p 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative or intraoperative revascularization did not affect survival outcomes in lung transplant patients. Selected patients with coronary artery disease may benefit when intervened during lung transplant procedures.

Artificial Lungs for Lung Failure in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic: Contemporary Review.

In patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), mortality remains high despite optimal medical management. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used to support such patients. ECMO is not a perfect solution; however, there are several limitations and serious complications associated with ECMO use. Moreover, the overall short-term mortality rate of patients with COVID-19 supported by ECMO is high (~30%). Some patients who survive severe acute respiratory distress syndrome have chronic lung failure requiring oxygen supplementation, long-term mechanical ventilation, or ECMO support. Although lung transplant remains the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage lung failure from COVID-19, optimal patient selection and transplant timing for patients with COVID-19-related lung failure are not clear. Access to an artificial lung (AL) that can be used for long-term support as a bridge to transplant, bridge to recovery, or even destination therapy will become increasingly important. In this review, we discuss why the COVID-19 pandemic may drive progress in AL technology, challenges to AL implementation, and how some of these challenges might be overcome.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Prior to Lung Transplantation: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

There is an established association between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and increased mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery; however, there is little data demonstrating the influence of blood transfusion while awaiting lung transplantation. Therefore, our study compared the impact of pretransplant RBC transfusion on patient survival and post-transplantation adverse events. Adult lung transplant patient data were extracted retrospectively using the United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on pretransplant transfusion status. In total, 28,217 patients were analyzed in our study (transfused: n = 1,415 and not transfused: n = 26,802). There was an increasing trend in pretransplant transfusion rates from 2006 to 2020. Transfused patients had a higher incidence of adverse events post-transplantation, including dialysis, stroke, and acute organ rejection before discharge. Multivariable survival analysis found an increased mortality risk in patients who required pretransplant transfusion(s) compared to those who did not have a transfusion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.41; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome development between groups (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82-1.04; p = 0.185). To conclude, our study provides data to suggest that RBC transfusion(s) before lung transplantation are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality, but have no association with chronic graft rejection development.

Lung Transplantation for COVID-19 Pulmonary Sequelae.

BACKGROUND: The role of lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related lung failure is evolving as the pandemic persists. METHODS: From January 2021 to April 2022, 20 patients (median age 62 y; range 31-77) underwent lung transplantation for COVID-related lung failure at our institution. We reviewed their clinical and intraoperative characteristics and early outcomes including postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eleven patients (55%) had chronic lung disease when they contracted COVID-19. All 20 patients required hospitalization for antivirus treatment. Median lung allocation score was 74.7 (33.1-94.0). Thirteen patients (65%) underwent single-lung transplants, and 7 patients (35%) underwent double-lung transplants. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 2 (10%) patients because of severe coronary artery disease. Postoperatively, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was needed in 3 patients (15%) because of severe primary graft dysfunction; all were eventually weaned. Ten patients (50%) experienced deep venous thrombosis, and 1 eventually developed a major pulmonary embolus. The median intensive care unit stay and hospital stays were 6.5 d (3-44) and 18 d (7-77), respectively. During a median follow-up of 201 d (47-418), we experienced 1 late mortality due to COVID-19-related myocarditis. Among the 13 patients with single-lung transplant, 5 demonstrated improvement in their native lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation yielded favorable early outcomes in a heterogeneous patient cohort that included older patients, obese patients, and patients with coronary artery disease or preexisting chronic lung disease. Our data also shed light on the transforming role of lung transplantation for the pulmonary sequelae of a complex multisystem COVID-19 disorder.

Two Staged Single Lung Transplants in the Current Era: A United Network for Organ Sharing Study.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that outcomes after 2 staged, contralateral single lung transplantation procedures (SSLTs) may be equivalent to those of double lung transplantation (DLT) by capitalizing on the known long-term survival advantages of DLT. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing data set (1987-2018), the largest national data set available, the outcomes of 278 SSLTs were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the outcomes of 21,121 standard DLTs. RESULTS: During SSLT, the median interval between the 2 transplants was 960 days, and the indication for the second transplant was most often chronic lung allograft dysfunction (n = 148; 53.2%) or the same disease that necessitated the first transplant (n = 81; 29.1%). The patients who underwent SSLT were significantly older and had a higher baseline creatinine level than the patients who underwent DLT. Most posttransplantation short-term outcomes were equivalent between the second stage of SSLT and DLT, but renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis was notably higher after SSLT. There were no differences in long-term survival. In multivariate analysis, baseline creatinine, O2 support at rest, ventilator support at the time of the second transplantation, and posttransplantation renal insufficiency requiring dialysis were independent predictors of 1-year mortality after SSLT. CONCLUSIONS: Over a study period of 30 years, long-term survival after SSLT was comparable with survival after DLT. With further analysis of individual risk profiles, including the contributions of preoperative renal function and functional status, SSLT can be a valuable option for patients who would have undergone single lung transplantation to reap the long-term benefits of a second transplant.

Increased Risk Donors Utilized in Lung Transplantation At A Single Center.

Introduction: In 2013, the US Public Health Service (PHS) updated guidelines for high-risk donor organs and renamed the category increased risk. Project Aims: We compared survival of patients who received increased risk or non-increased risk donor lungs to determine if PHS designated increased risk donor lungs were an underutilized resource. Design: This retrospective cohort analysis compared survival and utilization rates of increased-risk and non-increased-risk donor lungs used in lung transplantation at a single institution over a period of 8 years (Feb-2012 through Mar-2020). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to analyze impact on survival of variables significantly associated with risk status, including recipient ethnicity, lung allocation score (LAS), donor age, year of transplant procedure, and lung transplant type. Results: Of 744 lung transplant recipients from February 2012 through March 2020, there were 192 (26%) recipients of increased risk designated lungs. In 2012 and 2013, 6% and 0% respectively of the lungs transplanted were increased risk labeled. After the PHS guidelines were nationally implemented in February 2014, the proportion of increased risk lung transplants rose to 7% (2014), 21% (2015), 27% (2016), 35% (2017), 28% (2018), 27% (2019), and 40% (January-March 2020). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test comparison showed no significant difference in survival between patients that received increased risk versus non-increased risk labeled lungs (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Our analysis suggested the 2013 PHS increased risk designation threatened underutilization of viable donor lungs, providing further support for the 2020 PHS changes.

Intraoperative methods for wrapping anastomoses after airway reconstruction: a case series.

Background: Anastomosis management is the main challenge of airway resection and reconstruction, and postoperative anastomotic complications, including ischemia, stenosis, dehiscence, and separation may lead to severe outcomes and a poor prognosis. The anastomotic buttress is vital in airway reconstruction, but the selection of surgical buttress and reinforcement remains controversial. We aimed to demonstrate and evaluate the buttress options of anastomosis, including their preoperative characteristics, the intraoperative process, and the incidence of postoperative complications to help address the controversy regarding anastomosis management. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution. Patients who underwent airway reconstruction with anastomotic wrapping from Jan. 2019 to Sep. 2021 were enrolled in this study and preoperative characteristics and operational features were collected. All patients were carefully followed up by telephone and outpatient. Their postoperative complications and postoperative status after 6 months were recorded. The surgical procedures and clinical characteristics of the buttress options of anastomosis were assessed. Results: A total of 62 patients undergoing either cervical tracheal, thoracic tracheal, carinal, or secondary carinal and main bronchus resection and reconstruction were evaluated. The anastomotic buttress used included mediastinal pleural flap (24/62, 38.7%), anterior cervical muscle (14/62, 22.6%), sternocleidomastoid (2/62, 3.2%), thymus flap (12/62, 19.4%), intercostal muscle flap (2/62, 3.2%), biological patch (2/62, 3.2%), prepericardial fat (1/62, 1.6%), thyroid gland (1/62, 1.6%), pectoralis major flap (2/62, 3.2%), and omental flap (2/62, 3.2%). All procedures produced satisfactory results without short-term anastomotic complications. A follow-up for 6 months was conducted and all patients were alive postoperatively. Tracheomalacia stenosis postoperatively occurred in 3 patients and they were subsequently treated with an endotracheal stent. One patient had tumor recurrence 3 months after surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Various anastomotic wrapping materials are used in airway reconstruction. Different utilizations of buttress are selected according to the anatomic characteristics and the reconstruction method used. This study indicated that appropriate surgical buttresses for wrapping anastomoses are legitimate alternatives to reduce the risk of anastomotic complications.

Single Lung Transplant Remains a Viable Option for Patients With Severe Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Although double lung transplant is recommended in patients with severe secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH), our institutional experiences suggest a role for single lung transplant in these patients. Here, we review our experience prioritizing single lung transplant in patients with SPH to minimize their surgical burden. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our lung transplant database to identify patients with SPH who underwent single lung transplant. Patients were stratified as either mild SPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure 25-40 mm Hg) or severe SPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure >40 mm Hg). Singe lung recipients without PH transplanted over the same time were also examined. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2019, 318 patients underwent single lung transplantation; 217 had mild SPH (68%), and 59 had severe SPH (18.5%). Forty-two patients without PH underwent single lung transplant. When the groups were compared, significantly higher pulmonary vascular resistance was noted in the severe SPH group, and obesity was noted in both the mild and severe SPH groups. Although the severe SPH group required more intraoperative cardiopulmonary support (37.3% versus 10.3% versus 4.7%, P < 0.05), there were no significant differences in most major postoperative parameters, including the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation or the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction. Survival 1 y posttransplant was not significantly different among the groups (93.2% versus 89.4% versus 92.9%, P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience supports the option of single lung transplantation with appropriate intraoperative mechanical circulatory support in patients with SPH. This strategy is worth pursuing, especially with ongoing donor lung shortages.

Anastomotic Suturing Techniques and Their Association With Post-Lung Transplantation Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, standard practice is to use the continuous suturing technique on the bronchial anastomosis during lung transplantation. This study used a large cohort to investigate and contrast continuous and interrupted suturing techniques, comparing survival outcomes and occurrence of postoperative bronchial complications to examine if utilization of interrupted suturing has merit. METHODS: Survival outcomes of 740 single-center lung transplant recipients over 8 y (February 2012-March 2020) were compared by suturing techniques: either continuous or interrupted at the bronchial anastomosis. Clinical parameters and demographics were compared between two suturing groups, with P values < 0.05 considered significant. The groups were compared for postoperative morbidity, including need for bronchial interventions. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox regression analysis was run with statistically significant variables to study association with survival. RESULTS: Of the 740 patients, 462 received the continuous suturing technique and 278 received the interrupted suturing technique. Most demographic and clinical data were not statistically significant between the two groups, and those that were significant were not associated with worse survival outcomes, with the exception of the variable diagnosis. Bronchial complications were comparable between the continuous and interrupted groups (12.6% versus 10.4%, P = 0.382). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.12). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed comparable survival between groups (P = 0.98), and Cox regression analysis showed that only diagnosis, bronchial complications, and ECMO utilization were associated with different survival outcomes. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder was shown to be associated with more favorable survival outcomes as opposed to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the category "other". The need for ECMO and the occurrence of a bronchial complication were also associated with worse survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques showed reasonable post-transplant outcomes, as our study demonstrated similar survival outcomes and bronchial complication rates.

Postoperative Bronchial Complications After Lung Transplantation Related to Anastomosis Suture.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bronchial anastomotic complications are not uncommon in lung transplant recipients. We investigated 2 surgical techniques (continuous and interrupted sutures) during bronchial anastomosis, comparing survival and postoperative bronchial complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 421 patients who were transplanted in our center (February 2012 to March 2018). Patients were divided according to bronchial anastomotic technique (continuous or interrupted). Demographics and clinical parameters were compared for significance (P < .05). Comparison of postoperative morbidity included bronchial complications, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and intervention requirements. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank tests (P < .05). RESULTS: Of the 421 patients, 290 underwent bronchial anastomoses with continuous suture; 44 of these patients had postoperative bronchial complications (15.2%). Contrarily, 131 patients underwent the interrupted suture technique; 9 patients in this group had postoperative bronchial complications (6.9%). Demographics and clinical parameters included age, sex, ethnicity, etiology, lung allocation score, body mass index, donor age, lung transplant type, cardiopulmonary bypass usage, surgical approaches, and median length of stay. Postoperative complications (continuous vs interrupted) were bronchial complications (P = .017), venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (P = .41), venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (P = .38), and complications requiring dilatation with stent placement (P = .09). Kaplan-Meier curve showed better survival in the interrupted group (P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the comparable postoperative results between the continuous and interrupted technique.

Lung Transplant Type and Donor Age in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Single Center Study.

BACKGROUD: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) accounts for a marked proportion of diagnoses on the US lung transplant (LTx) list. The effects of single (SLT) versus double LTx (DLT) and lung donor age on survival in IPF remain unclear and were investigated in this study. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed survival of LTx recipients with IPF at a single institution from February 2012-March 2020. Survival was analyzed and compared between LTx types (SLT and DLT), donor ages, and the combined groups (LTx type & donor age) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 744 LTx patients at our institution, 307 (41.3%) were diagnosed with IPF, of which 208 (67.8%) were SLT, and 97 (31.6%) were DLT (2 excluded patients underwent heart-lung transplantation). There was no significant difference in survival due to LTx type (P = 0.41) or for patients with donor age <50 or ≥50 y (P = 0.46). Once stratified by both LTx type and donor age, analysis showed no significant difference in survival between the four groups (P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: With ethical consideration for organ allocation, as the average age of the US population increases, donor lungs aged ≥50 are an increasingly useful resource in LTx. Our findings suggest donor age and LTx type do not significantly affect survival. Therefore, SLT, and donor lungs aged ≥50 ought to be more readily considered as non-inferior options for LTx in patients with IPF.

Donor quality assessment and size match in lung transplantation.

Careful donor quality assessment and size match can impact long-term survival in lung transplantation. With this article, we review the conceptual and practical aspects of the preoperative donor lung quality assessment and size matching.

Venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients real world experience from a high volume center.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) post lung transplantation is common and has been associated with worse post transplant survival. We report a comprehensive single center review of VTE incidence in the first post transplant year, investigate modifiable risk factors and assess impact on short term outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of all lung transplant recipients between August 2016 to 2018 at Temple University Hospital. Patients were followed for 1 year post transplant. All patients were screened for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the first 2 weeks with a venous duplex study. Pre transplant, intra operative, post operative variables, and peri-operative practice patterns were compared between VTE positive and VTE negative groups. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors for early VTE (VTE within 30 days after transplant). RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included in the study, 58 patients (24.7%) developed a VTE in the first post transplant year. Median time to diagnosis was 17 days. Of the patients with VTE, 76% had an isolated DVT, 13.5 % had an isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), and 10.3% had concomitant DVT and PE. In a multivariate logistic regression model, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR 1.93 p = 0.015) and interruption of VTE prophylaxis (OR 4.42 p < 0.0001) were predictive of early VTE. CONCLUSION: VTE post lung transplant is common despite the use of prophylactic anticoagulation. CPB use and interruption of DVT prophylaxis are risk factors for early post transplant VTE. Measures to ensure consistent and uninterrupted prophylaxis may help decrease VTE incidence after lung transplantation.

An Anthropometric Study of Lung Donors.

PURPOSE: A difference in the lower body to upper body ratio between similarly heighted individuals could lead to inadequately matched transplants. There has been a perception in clinical circles that body ratio varies between people of different races, and investigating this supposition would prove useful in increasing transplant match accuracy. The investigation's purpose was to derive an equation with a greater correlation to lung length than height alone. METHODS: Lung transplantation donor data for 480 adult patients was obtained and divided by ethnicity-Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic. Height, weight, age, sex, right and left lung length were evaluated for significance. The R2 value of the multiple linear regression with these variables vs. lung length was determined and tested in a separate dataset of 100 patients. RESULTS: Only the distribution of height was significant between the 3 ethnicities (P = 0.041). None of the ANCOVAs were significant (P < 0.05) or near significant (P < 0.10). For the strongest correlation model with lung length, height had a linear fit, weight had a cubic fit, and age had a logistic fit. Multiple regression models were successfully created for right lung (R2 = 0.202) and left lung (R2 = 0.213). Independent testing showed a correlation of 0.131 and 0.136, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using demographic information from the donor and recipient as proxies for estimating lung size should only serve as a rough guide due to their weak correlation with lung length. As a result, for greater accuracy, donor-recipient matching should be individualized by taking donor and recipient chest X-Rays and/or TLC into consideration.