Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective 3-year multicenter Egyptian study.

Background/Aim: Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is often diagnosed at late stages with mostly unresectable lesions. Recently, EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has gained wide acceptance and appears to be a feasible and safe backup option after ERCP failure in such patients. Herein, we aimed to represent a 3-year multi-center Egyptian experience in the application of this challenging procedure for distal MBO as a salvage technique after failed ERCP. Patients and methods: This was a prospective multi-center study of patients underwent EUS-BD for distal MBO in the duration between December 2018 and December 2021, after ERCP failure. Results: Ninety-one patients (59 males, median age: 61 years) were included in the study. EUS-guided extrahepatic approach including choledocho-duodenostomy (CDS) was done for 48 patients (52.8%), followed by choledecho-antrostomy (CAS) in 4 patients (4.4%). The intrahepatic approach included hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) for 35 patients (38.5%) and antegrade stenting (AG) stenting in 2 patients (2.2%), while Rendezvous (RV) approach was performed in 2 patients (2.2%). Technical and Clinical success were achieved in the majority of cases; 93.4% and 94.1% respectively. Adverse events occurred in 13.2% of patients which were mostly mild (8.2%) to moderate (2.4%). Only one patient died within 48h after the procedure with progression of preceding sepsis and organ failure. Conclusion: EUS-BD is a feasible option, even in developing countries, after a failed ERCP, and it is a relatively safe option in patients with MBO once experienced team and resources were present. Majority of cases in our study have achieved technical and clinical success with relatively low incidence of adverse events.

Evaluation of serum procollagen aminoterminal propeptide III, laminin, and hydroxyproline as predictors of severe fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

In an attempt to identify biochemical analytes that could enhance the discrimination between the patients with severe liver fibrosis (F3-F4) and mild fibrosis (F1-F2) based on absolute values of biochemical markers, we measured 12 analytes, including procollagen III aminoterminal propeptide (PIIINP), laminin, proline, hydroxylproline, glycine, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total bilirubin, total protein, and prothrombin time in 252 individuals with chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC). PIIINP and laminin were determined by radio-immunoassay; the degraded amino acids were determined using high performance liquid chromatography. Statistical analyses were performed by logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The best linear combination of blood markers was selected by multivariate discriminant analysis (MDA) for construction of the fibrosis discriminant score (FDS). FDS, an index of five markers (PIIINP, laminin, hydroxyproline, prothrombin activity, and AST/ALT) correctly classified 82% of the patients with severe liver fibrosis at a discriminant cut-off score=-0.5 (i.e., less than -0.5 indicated severe liver fibrosis and greater than -0.5 indicated mild liver fibrosis with sensitivity (76%) and specificity (89%). This result was reproduced in a validation study with no significant difference. In conclusion, FDS is useful for identifying severe liver fibrosis in patients with CHC.