Short-term inhalation of sargramostim with concomitant high-dose steroids does not hasten recovery in moderate COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) inhalation may alleviate pulmonary inflammation caused by viral pneumonia. To investigate this, we evaluated its efficacy on COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04642950) evaluated patients in the first half of 2021 at seven Japanese hospitals. Hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with moderate hypoxaemia inhaled sargramostim or placebo for 5 days. The primary endpoint was days to achieve a ≥ 2-category improvement from baseline on a modified 7-category ordinal scale. Secondary endpoints included degree of oxygenation, defined by amount of oxygen supply, and serum CCL17 level. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive sargramostim or placebo, of which 47 and 23 were analysed, respectively. No difference was observed between groups regarding the primary endpoint (8.0 and 7.0 days for sargramostim and placebo, respectively) or in the secondary endpoints, except for CCL17. A post hoc sub-analysis indicated that endpoint assessments were influenced by concomitant corticosteroid therapy. When the cumulative corticosteroid dose was ≤500 mg during Days 1-5, recovery and oxygenation were faster in the sargramostim group than for placebo. Bolus dose corticosteroids were associated with temporarily impaired oxygenation and delayed clinical recovery. The increase in serum CCL17, a candidate prognostic factor, reflected improvement with sargramostim inhalation. The number of adverse events was similar between groups. Two serious adverse events were observed in the sargramostim group without causal relation. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled sargramostim was likely to be effective for COVID-19 pneumonia unless the concomitant corticosteroid dose was high.

Safety and Efficacy of the Sirolimus Gel for TSC Patients With Facial Skin Lesions in a Long-Term, Open-Label, Extension, Uncontrolled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Our previous clinical studies have demonstrated the short-term efficacy and safety of the sirolimus gel for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). However, long-term clinical evidence is lacking. Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with the sirolimus gel for the skin lesions of TSC patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial in 94 Japanese patients with TSC. Patients applied the 0.2% sirolimus gel on their face or head twice daily for > 52 weeks (maximum 136 weeks for safety). The safety endpoints were the rate of adverse event (AE)-caused discontinuation (primary endpoint) and the incidence of AEs. The efficacy endpoint was the response rate of angiofibromas, cephalic plaques, and hypomelanotic macules. RESULTS: Among 94 enrolled patients (mean age, 21 years; range 3-53 years), the rate of AE-caused discontinuation was 2.1% (2/94 patients). Although application site irritation and dry skin occurred relatively frequently, none of the drug-related AEs were serious; most of the drug-related AEs resolved rapidly. The major drug-related AEs (≥ 5% in incidence) were application site irritation (30.9%), dry skin (27.7%), acne (20.2%), eye irritation (8.5%), pruritus (8.5%), erythema (7.4%), dermatitis acneiform (6.4%), and dermatitis contact (5.3%). The response rates of angiofibromas, cephalic plaques, and hypomelanotic macules were 78.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.0-86.3%], 66.7% (95% CI 51.1-80.0%), and 72.2% (95% CI 46.5-90.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gel was well tolerated for a long time by patients with TSC involving facial skin lesions and continued to be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634931.

Bioavailability of intravenous fosphenytoin sodium in healthy Japanese volunteers.

To compare and evaluate the bioavailability for intravenous fosphenytoin sodium with that of intravenous phenytoin sodium in Japanese subjects. In study 1, healthy Japanese male volunteers received a 30-min infusion of 375 mg fosphenytoin sodium or an equimolar dose of 250 mg phenytoin by a double-blind, crossover method. In study 2, other healthy Japanese male volunteers received a 30-min or 10-min infusion of 563 mg fosphenytoin sodium, followed by a dose of 750 mg after 2 weeks in an unblinded manner. Comparing with 250 mg phenytoin sodium, 375 mg fosphenytoin sodium exhibited lower total plasma phenytoin C max, whereas the geometric mean ratio of the AUC of total and free phenyotoin for fosphenytoin sodium at a dose of 375 mg was very similar to phenytoin sodium at a equimolar dose of 250 mg (AUC0-t ratio: 0.98 and 1.02, respectively). Therefore, fosphenytoin is almost completely converted to phenytoin in subjects. Fosphenytoin sodium was rapidly converted to phenytoin at doses of 375, 563, and 750 mg. The maximum concentration (C max) of total plasma phenytoin increased in a dose-dependent manner. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased slightly more than proportionally with the administered dose, and clearance (CL) decreased with increasing dose. Pain and other infusion-site reactions were reported by all 12 subjects with phenytoin sodium, whereas very few symptoms were observed with fosphenytoin sodium. In conclusion, fosphenytoin sodium is considered to be a useful substitute for phenytoin sodium with almost no associated injection-site reactions.

Population pharmacokinetics of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium in pediatric patients, adult patients, and healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: We performed a population pharmacokinetic analysis of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium in healthy, neurosurgical, and epileptic subjects, including pediatric patients, and determined the optimal dose and infusion rate for achieving the therapeutic range. METHODS: We used pooled data obtained from two phase I studies and one phase III study performed in Japan. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software. The optimal dose and infusion rate were determined using simulation results obtained using the final model. The therapeutic range for total plasma phenytoin concentration is 10-20 µg/mL. RESULTS: We used a linear two-compartment model with conversion of fosphenytoin to phenytoin. Pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin, such as total clearance and central and peripheral volume of distribution were influenced by body weight. The dose simulations are as follows. In adult patients, the optimal dose and infusion rate of phenytoin for achieving the therapeutic range was 22.5 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg/min respectively. In pediatric patients, the total plasma concentration of phenytoin was within the therapeutic range for a shorter duration than that in adult patients at 22.5 mg/kg (3 mg/kg/min). However, many pediatric patients showed phenytoin concentration within the toxic range after administration of a dose of 30 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium could be described using a linear two-compartment model. The administration of fosphenytoin sodium 22.5 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 3 mg/kg/min was optimal for achieving the desired plasma phenytoin concentration.