Endoscopic and Nonendoscopic Approaches to Single-Level Lumbar Spine Decompression: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis and Frailty-Driven Predictive Model.

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, shorter recovery time, and reduced complications. The present study reports multicenter, international data, comparing ESS and non-ESS approaches for singlelevel lumbar decompression, and proposes a frailty-driven predictive model for nonhome discharge (NHD) disposition. METHODS: Cases of ESS and non-ESS lumbar spine decompression were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2020). Propensity score matching was performed on baseline characteristics frailty score (measured by risk analysis index [RAI] and modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]). The primary outcome of interest was NHD disposition. A predictive model was built using logistic regression with RAI as the primary driver. RESULTS: Single-level nonfusion spine lumbar decompression surgery was performed in 38,686 patients. Frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of NHD with excellent discriminatory accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: C-statistic: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.94) in ESS cohort, C-statistic: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.76) overall cohort. After propensity score matching, there was a reduction in total operative time (89 minutes vs. 103 minutes, p = 0.049) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (0.82 days vs. 1.37 days, p < 0.001) in patients treated endoscopically. In ROC curve analysis, the frailty-driven predictive model performed with excellent diagnostic accuracy for the primary outcome of NHD (C-statistic: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88). CONCLUSION: After frailty-based propensity matching, ESS is associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital LOS, and decreased NHD. The RAI frailty-driven model predicts NHD with excellent diagnostic accuracy and may be applied to preoperative decisionmaking with a user-friendly calculator: nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/lumbar_decompression_dischargedispo.

Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status (as measured by modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]) versus age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect spinal tumor resection patients' data from 2015 to 2019 (n = 4,662). Univariate and multivariate analyses for age and mFI-5 were performed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to a nonhome destination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that mFI-5 was a more robust predictor of worse postoperative outcomes as compared to age. Furthermore, based on categorical analysis of frailty tiers, increasing frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. 'Severely frail' patients were found to have the highest risk, with odds ratio 16.4 (95% confidence interval [CI],11.21-35.44) for 30-day mortality, 3.02 (95% CI, 1.97-4.56) for major complications, and 2.94 (95% CI, 2.32-4.21) for LOS. In ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743) achieved superior discrimination compared to age (AUC = 0.594) for mortality. CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, as measured by mFI-5, is a more robust predictor as compared to age, for poor postoperative outcomes in spinal tumor surgery patients. The mFI-5 may be clinically used for preoperative risk stratification of spinal tumor patients.

Lumbar Annular High-Intensity Zone as a Precursor to Disc Extrusion.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common affliction with numerous causes. Some individuals experience LBP attributed to disc pathology. Disc pathology has been implicated in a plurality of cases of LBP, and some cases are associated with annular fissures (AFs). AFs are weaknesses in the structure that contains the nucleus pulposus and is the site of possible disc herniations. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), some AFs manifest as the high-intensity zone (HIZ), otherwise known as an annular enhancement region. In this report, we present three patients with LBP, mild radiculitis, and HIZ who later developed herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) with extrusion through the HIZ. These cases suggest that HIZ indicates a propensity for the future development of disc extrusion through the weakened tissue at the AF visualized as HIZ on MRI. With a better understanding of the association between AFs and disc herniations with HIZ, clinicians may be able to predict and prevent the pain and disability associated with disc extrusion.

Endoscopic Transforaminal Drainage of a Ventrally Located Thoracic Epidural Abscess.

BACKGROUND: No formalized surgical treatment strategy exists for a thoracic epidural abscess. Although endoscopic approaches have been described for the treatment of spinal infections, this is the first report of an endoscopic transforaminal approach for the drainage of a thoracic/lumbar epidural abscess with placement of indwelling abscess drain. We present a novel use of a known endoscopic approach and describe a minimally invasive surgical option for ventrally located thoracic epidural abscesses. CASE DESCRIPTION: A patient with ventrally located T5-L5 epidural abscess with cord compression was taken for endoscopic transforaminal drainage at the right T9-10 level. A drain was left in the abscess cavity and tunneled subcutaneously for continued postoperative drainage. Immediate postoperative radiographic results showed significant reduction in the abscess size. The patient tolerated the procedure well with return to neurologic baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic transforaminal drainage of ventrally located thoracic epidural abscess is a safe procedure that may be an option for patients with a purulent-filled abscess. This procedure should be considered an option to avoid more invasive procedures that would require decompression and possibly instrumented fusion.