Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of an acrylic-based resilient liner on perceived chewing ability in edentulous patients wearing mandibular complete dentures.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of an acrylic-based resilient liner (ARL) on perceived chewing ability in patients using mandibular complete dentures compared with that of patients using mandibular complete dentures with a conventional acrylic resin (CAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at two centers from April 2004 to July 2006. Seventy-four subjects were randomly allocated to either the ARL or CAR group using a random permuted block method after obtaining written informed consent. A valid questionnaire listing 35 foods was used to evaluate the subjects' perceived chewing ability of each item, assessed according to the following scale: 0=cannot eat, 1=can eat with difficulty, and 2=can eat easily. If subjects did not eat the food because they disliked it or had not eaten it since first wearing dentures, they filled in a triangle or square, respectively. These figures were treated as a 0 during analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the ARL and CAR groups. The perceived chewing ability of subjects with new complete dentures was significantly higher than that of those with their old complete dentures. The duration of edentulism was positively associated with perceived chewing ability. CONCLUSIONS: An ARL applied to mandibular complete dentures has no significant impact on the perceived chewing ability of edentulous patients in comparison to a CAR.

Randomized controlled clinical trial for verifying the effect of silicone-based resilient denture liner on the masticatory function of complete denture wearers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether application of permanent silicone-based resilient denture liner (SR) to mandibular complete dentures significantly improves patients' masticatory ability compared to conventional heat-activated acrylic resin (AR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight edentulous patients were randomly placed into 1 of 2 crossover groups (AR-SR/SR-AR) by using a random permuted block within strata method. The AR-SR group received AR denture treatments followed by SR denture treatments. The SR-AR group received treatments in the reverse sequence. The outcomes were classified by matiscatory performance, mandibular movement, electromyographic activity, and maximum occlusal force. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in any of the baseline characteristic measurements between groups. SR denture wearers exhibited significantly higher masticatory performance than AR denture wearers. SR denture wearers exhibited a longer early-stage occluding period than AR denture wearers. There were no differences in electromyographic activity between the AR and SR groups. There were no significant differences in maximum occlusal force between the AR and SR groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the application of SR to mandibular complete dentures resulted in significant improvements to the patients' masticatory ability compared to AR.

Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective comparative trial was to evaluate whether patients treated with complete dentures with lingualized occlusion (LO) exhibited more positive results than patients treated with complete dentures with bilaterally balanced occlusion (BBO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight completely edentulous patients, ranging in age from 60 to 82 years (mean age 70.9), consented in writing to be participants in this trial. The first 14 patients enrolled in the study protocol were treated with complete dentures with LO, and the next 14 patients were treated with complete dentures with BBO. Baseline characteristics were measured prior to the trial. Main outcome variables involved subjective outcomes of general satisfaction, ability to masticate, and stability and retention of the prostheses; these were quantified with a 100-mm visual analog scale. Objective outcomes were masticatory performance and the number of adjustments. Statistical assessments of the 2 groups were compared using multiple linear regression analysis. The baseline characteristics were analyzed by Student t test and chi-square test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline. The height of the alveolar ridge exhibited significant correlations with masticatory performance (P = .02). The occlusal scheme exhibited a significant correlation with only the patient's retention satisfaction rating (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Despite limitations of this study attributed to the small sample size and lack of randomization, this pilot study found that edentulous patients fitted with complete dentures with LO experienced and expressed greater satisfaction with their denture retention. In addition, it was observed that a higher alveolar ridge resulted in greater masticatory performance.