Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian in healthy Japanese participants.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of milvexian, an oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Japanese participants. Participants received oral milvexian daily under fasted (50 mg and 200 mg) or fed conditions (500 mg) or placebo over 14 days; 24 participants (8/cohort: 6 milvexian; 2 placebo) were planned. Due to an unblinding event, participants in one cohort (200 mg daily) were discontinued, and a second cohort enrolled; 32 participants were included in safety and pharmacodynamic analyses, and 24/32 in pharmacokinetic analyses. Milvexian up to 500 mg daily for 14 days was generally well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. Milvexian exposure increased between 50-mg and 200-mg doses. Median Tmax was similar with 50-mg and 200-mg doses (2.5-3.0 h) and delayed under fed conditions (500 mg, 7.0-8.0 h). Median T1/2 was similar across doses (8.9-11.9 h). Multiple oral milvexian administrations resulted in concentration-related prolongation of aPTT and decreased FXI clotting activity. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of milvexian demonstrates suitability for further clinical development in Japanese participants.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, and Beclabuvir Combination in HCV-Infected Subjects.

A fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir (pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor), asunaprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor) was approved for hepatitis C virus treatment in Japan. The objectives of the analyses were to develop the daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir population pharmacokinetic models for the combination regimen. First, an original population pharmacokinetic model was developed using the data in non-Japanese hepatitis C virus-infected subjects. The model was subsequently updated after a phase 3 study in Japanese hepatitis C virus-infected subjects was available. A total of 11,382, 11,300, and 10,728 pharmacokinetic records from 1,228 subjects were included for daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir in the updated model, respectively. Daclatasvir and beclabuvir pharmacokinetics (PK) were described by a 1-compartment model with linear elimination and asunaprevir PK was described by 2-compartment model with linear elimination. Cirrhosis, baseline, and time-varying ALT were significant covariates on asunaprevir apparent oral clearance. Asian subjects had greater asunaprevir and beclabuvir exposures than white subjects. The effects of all covariates on daclatasvir PK were modest and not considered clinically significant. With the exception of race on asunaprevir and beclabuvir PK, no other parameters for daclatasvir, asunaprevir and beclabuvir population PK models were meaningfully impacted during the refinement with Japanese subjects.

Safety Exposure-Response Analysis for Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, and Beclabuvir Combinations in HCV-Infected Subjects.

The combination regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir has been developed for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the relationship between the exposures of the daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir regimen and liver-related laboratory elevations (Grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and total bilirubin [Tbili]), and to evaluate the impact of selected covariates on the exposure-response relationships. The exposure-response analysis was performed with data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies in hepatitis C virus-infected subjects. The probability of liver-related laboratory elevations were modeled using linear logistic regression. Selected covariates were tested using a forward-addition and backward-elimination approach. The final model for ALT elevation included Asian race, body weight in non-Asian subjects, and asunaprevir exposure. The final model for Tbili elevation included Asian race, fibrosis score (F0-F3 or F4) and asupanprevir exposure. Asian subjects had greater the Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates than non-Asians. The Grade 3 or 4 ALT elevation rate increased with decreasing body weight in non-Asian subjects. Subjects with F4 fibrosis score had a higher rate of Grade 3 or 4 Tbili elevation compared to subjects with F0 to F3 fibrosis score. Higher asunaprevir exposure was associated with increases in Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates; however, the impact on the ALT elevation was not clinically relevant and the effect on Tbili elevation was smaller than the other significant covariates.

Single- and multiple-ascending dose studies to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of daclatasvir and asunaprevir in healthy male Japanese subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) in healthy male Japanese subjects. METHODS: AI444-007 and AI447-005 were phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential, single-ascending dose (SAD), and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies assessing DCV or ASV, respectively. Eight subjects per panel were randomized to study drug or placebo (3 : 1). In the SAD part of each study, subjects received single oral dose DCV 1/10/50/100/200 mg or ASV 200/400/600/900/1,200 mg. In MAD, subjects received 14-day oral multiple dose DCV 1/10/100 mg once-daily or ASV 200/400/600 mg every 12 hours. Serial PK blood sampling occurred from predose to 72-hours postdose or post-last-dose. Safety and tolerability was assessed throughout. RESULTS: 64 (SAD, n = 40; MAD, n = 24) and 65 (SAD, n = 40; MAD, n = 25) subjects were enrolled in AI444-007 and AI447-005, respectively. DCV and ASV were generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or clinicallyrelevant changes in vital signs or ECG parameters. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable across treatment groups in both studies. DCV was readily absorbed, with median tmax of ~ 1 - 2 hours postdose and concentrations declining in a multi-phasic manner. Exposure generally increased dose-proportionally within dose-range studied. Steady-state was achieved between days 4 and 5 of multiple dosing. ASV was readily absorbed, with median tmax of ~ 2 - 4 hours postdose and concentrations declining in a biphasic manner. Exposure generally increased dose-proportionally within dose-range studied. Steady-state appeared to be achieved between days 3 - 5 of multiple dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest no clinically significant short-term safety signals with DCV and ASV at single or multiple doses in this population.