RESUMO
Background and objectives: To clarify the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with our novel reconstruction methods. Methods: Novel method is a reconstruction with a long and narrow gastric tube with widening of the proximal side created by linear stapler, and esophagogastrostomy is performed by linear stapler. In conventional method, esophagogastrostomy is performed by a circular stapler. Short- and long-term outcomes of a novel method were compared with those of conventional method. Results: A total of 44 patients whom LPG was performed were enrolled in this retrospective study. No cases of anastomotic leakage and stenosis were observed in both groups. The cases of postoperative reflux esophagitis (Grade B or higher) at 1 year after operation in the Novel group were less than those in the Conventional group (17% vs. 44%). Conclusion: LPG with novel reconstruction method can be easily performed, and may be feasible for the treatment of proximal gastric cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The shortage and aging of surgeons in regional surgical care has been remarkable, and the importance of surgical education for young surgeons in the region is only increasing. However, there are very few reports about regional surgical education. This study aimed to clarify the current status and issues regarding surgical education in regional surgical care and to examine the ideal way to provide surgical education in the region. METHODS: Two questionnaire surveys were carried out. (1) "Survey on the awareness regarding the education of young surgeons" was conducted by mail in institutions where surgeons worked. (2) "Survey on the current status of surgical education for young surgeons" was conducted via the Internet with surgeons under 40 years old and mentors at the same facility. RESULTS: There were 175 respondents to survey (1), among whom 131 (75%) surgeons were interested in educating young surgeons, and 112 (64%) were actively participating in this educating. Regarding the best evaluation methods for mentors who are educating young surgeons, the most frequent answer was "I don't know (51%)". The number of respondents in survey (2) was 87, including 27 (31%) young surgeons and 60 (69%) mentors. Although there was no difference between young surgeons and mentors in the level of satisfaction with the current status of young surgeons, 37% of young surgeons in urban areas were dissatisfied with their current status, compared to 0% in the regional area (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although surgeons did not have confidence in their own education, the level of satisfaction among young surgeons was high even in those providing regional surgical care. Development of an evaluation system for surgical education is necessary for young surgeons to receive more effective surgical education in the region.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Humanos , Japão , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Feminino , Masculino , Mentores , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Objective Laparoscopy-assisted distal gsstrectomy (LADG) with D1 + β lymph node dissection has become the most popular treatment for early gastric cancer in Asian countries. However, no one has shown the same clinical advantages with this procedure as with LADG with D1 + α lymph node dissection. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of LADG with D1 + β to that of LADG with D1 + α lymph node dissection. Methods During the period of June 2002 through June 2006, LADG with D1 + α lymph node dissection was performed in 54 patients, and LADG with D1 + β lymph node dissection was performed in 42 patients. Surgical findings, clinicopathologic data, postoperative course, complications, and blood analysis findings were compared between the two groups. Differences were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Results Patients in the two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, body mass index, and stage and pathologic characteristics of gastric cancer. A significantly greater number of N2 lymph nodes were harvested by D1 + β lymph node dissection than by D1 + α dissection (5.9vs. 2.7, P<0.01). However, no significanees in the total number of retrieved lymph nodes (24.7 vs. 22.2) or perigastric lymph nodes dissected (18.9 vs. 19.4) were identified between the D1 + β and D1 +α groups. There was also no significant difference between the D1 + α and D1 + β groups with respect to operation time, blood loss, complication rate, time to first walking, first flatus, first eating, and first defecation, frequency of analgesics, volume of oral intake on postoperative day 7, weight loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Blood analysis showed there were no significant differences in white blood cell count, levels of C-reactive protein, and serum albumin. Conclusion The short-term outcome of LADG with D1 + β lymph node dissection is comparable to that of LADG with D1 + α lymph node dissection.