Migration of lymphatic endothelial cells and lymphatic vascular development in the craniofacial region of embryonic mice.

Lymphatic development in mice is initiated in the trunk at embryonic day (E) 9.5. This study aimed to examine the origin of craniofacial lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and the developmental process of lymphatic vessels in the mouse craniofacial region. Serial sections from ICR mouse embryos at E9.5-E14.5 were immunolabeled with LEC and venous endothelial cell (VEC) markers. These markers included prospero homeobox protein 1 (Prox1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (Vegfr3), lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (Lyve1), and C-C motif chemokine 2 (Ccl21) for LEC, and COUP transcription factor 2 (CoupTF2) and endomucin (Emcn) for VEC. LECs were monitored as an index in Prox1/Vegfr3 double-positive cells using three-dimensional analysis because LECs express Prox1 and Vegfr3 ab initio during lymphatic vascular development. LECs appeared in VECs of the lateral walls of cardinal veins (CVs) at E9.5. These LECs were dichotomized into LEC populations that formed lymph sacs close to CVs and were scattered in the surrounding CVs. The scattered LECs formed cellular streams and extended from the trunk to the mandibular arches at E10.5 - E11.5. In the mandibular arches, individual LECs aggregated, and formed lymph sacs and tubular lymphatic vessels at E11.5-E14.5. Expression of the LEC marker proteins Lyve1 and Ccl21 in LECs changed during craniofacial lymphatic vascular development. Collectively, these findings suggest that craniofacial LECs originate from CVs of the trunk and migrate into the mandibular arches. Additionally, we found that craniofacial lymphatic vessels are formed according to morphogenesis of individual LECs that migrate from CVs.

Heterogeneous tumor stromal microenvironments of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in tongue and nodal metastatic lesions in a xenograft mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma exhibits a poor prognosis, caused by aggressive progression and early-stage metastasis to cervical lymph nodes. Here, we developed a xenograft mouse model to explore the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment that may govern local invasion and nodal metastasis of tumor cells. METHODS: We transplanted five oral carcinoma cell lines into the tongues of nude mice and determined tongue tumor growth and micrometastatic dissemination by serially sectioning the tongue and lymph node lesions in combination with immunohistochemistry and computer-assisted image analysis. Our morphometric analysis enabled a quantitative assessment of blood and lymphatic endothelial densities in the intratumoral and host stromal regions. RESULTS: All cell lines tested were tumorigenic in mouse tongue. The metastatic lesion-derived carcinoma cell lines (OSC19, OSC20, and HSC2) yielded a 100% nodal metastasis rate, whereas the primary tumor-derived cell lines (KOSC2 and HO-1-u-1) showed <40% metastatic potential. Immunohistochemistry showed that the individual cell lines gave rise to heterogeneous tumor architecture and phenotypes and that their micrometastatic lesions assimilated the immunophenotypic properties of the corresponding tongue tumors. Notably, OSC19 and OSC20 cells shared similar aggressive tumorigenicity in both the tongue and lymph node environments but displayed markedly diverse immunophenotypes and gene expression profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Our model facilitated comparing the tumor microenvironments in tongue and lymph node lesions. The results support that tumorigenicity and tumor architecture in the host tongue environment depend on the origin and properties of the carcinoma cell lines and that metastatic progression may take place through heterogeneous tumor-host interactions.