Comparison of Various Commonly Used Luting Cements on the Success of Composite Inlays Assessed by the Levels of the Microleakage-An In vitro Study.

Introduction: Indirect composite restoration is one of the commonly followed procedures in the posterior teeth. The success of this is dependent on many factors, one being the luting cement. Hence, the current study explores the microleakage of the two luting cements at 2 different times. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human teeth were taken, and class II cavities were made that were to receive the composite inlays. They were grouped as supragingival and subgingival, which for further divided as were further subdivided to be observed for marginal leakage at cervical and occlusal margins, at the end of a day and 1 month. Each group had ten specimens. The luting cements that were evaluated were Variolink N and RelyX Unicem. After the composite inlay restoration was done for all the specimens, the sections were put on slides, and a stereomicroscope was used to measure the amount of dye penetration. Leakage was evaluated and compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Results: At the end of 1 day, there was no significant alteration in the microleakage in the occlusal or cervical regions for either region supragingivally or subgingivally between the two luting cements. Significant difference between the two cements at the cervical borders at the end of a month was seen for both the margins. When compared supragingivally and subgingivally at the end of 1 day or at the end of 1 month, there was not a significant difference for any of the cements. Conclusion: Within the constraints of the current investigation, it can be said that there was similar microleakage for both Variolink N and RelyX Unicem at the conclusion of a day's storage time. After a 1-month storage period, RelyX Unicem showed more cervical microleakage than Variolink N.

Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of Three Resin-Based Sealers by 3,(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide Assay and Comet Assay - An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The complete sealing of the pulpal space contributes to the better healing potential after an root canal treatment, and root canal sealers are an integral part of this treatment which comes in contact with the periodontal tissue. Biocompatibility of an endodontic sealer plays an important role in the root canal treatment procedure. Hence, the aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity effect of three resin-based sealers on human periodontal fibroblast cells. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This in vitro study was conducted in Dr. Prabhakar Kore's Basic Science and Research Center and K. L. E V. K. Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human periodontal fibroblasts were incubated with 15 specimens of Group 1 - AH Plus Group 2 - MTA Fillapex, and Group 3 - GuttaFlow 2, respectively. Cytotoxicity was assessed by 3,(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay and genotoxicity was assessed by Comet assay at time intervals at 24 h and 48 h. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: AH Plus and GuttaFlow 2 did not show any cytotoxicity or genotoxicity. MTA Fillapex was slightly cytotoxic throughout the time interval, and it also showed low genotoxicity throughout the time periods for which it was tested. CONCLUSION: AH Plus and GuttaFlow 2 did not show any cytotoxic and genotoxic effect; however, MTA Fillapex showed cytotoxic and genotoxic effect throughout the time interval.

Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of a Resin Sealer to Dentin after a Final Flush of Three Irrigants.

AIM: To evaluate the push-out bond strength of resin-based sealer to root dentin after a final flush of three different irrigants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human mandibular premolars were sectioned 4 mm below the cement-enamel junction and 60 horizontal disks of 2 mm from middle one-third of the root were prepared. The disks were immersed in 3% sodium hypochlorite for 1 minute, and after drying the disks, they were finally flushed with the following irrigants: group I-Chitosan solution, group II-Morinda citrifolia juice (MCJ), and group III-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The disks were filled with AH Plus sealer, and after 7 days, the disks were subjected to push-out bond strength using a universal testing machine. RESULTS: EDTA had the highest push-out bond strength followed by MCJ and then chitosan. CONCLUSION: Chitosan and MCJ can be used as alternative irrigants as a final flush during the cleaning and shaping of the root canals. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: EDTA, chitosan solution, and MCJ are efficient in smear layer removal which thereby increases better sealer penetration and prevents the dislocation of obturating materials.

Interdisciplinary management of an isolated intrabony defect.

The treatment of intrabony defects is a real challenge in molar teeth as it is chronic, slowly progressing disease which needs timely intervention. Periodontal inflammation associated with intrabony defect is not a separate entity as it secondarily affects the pulp causing retrograde pulpitis. However, treatment of these lesions will be complicated due to extensive bone loss. The tooth was endodontically treated followed by periodontal surgery to eliminate the deep periodontal pocket and promote bone fill in osseous defect. PepGen P-15 composited with platelet rich plasma was utilized for enhancing bone formation. The combination of these graft materials provides synergistic effect on bone regeneration.

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, cleaning ability of hand and two rotary systems in root canal retreatment.

AIM: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, cleaning ability of hand and two rotary systems in root canal retreatment. METHODOLOGY: Sixty extracted premolars were retreated with following systems: Group -ProTaper Universal retreatment files, Group 2-ProFile system, Group 3-H-file. Specimens were split longitudinally and amount of remaining gutta-percha on the canal walls was assessed using direct visual scoring with the aid of stereomicroscope. Results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA test. RESULTS: Completely clean root canal walls were not achieved with any of the techniques investigated. However, all three systems proved to be effective for gutta-percha removal. Significant difference was found between ProTaper universal retreatment file and H-file, and also between ProFile and H-file. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of the present study, ProTaper Universal retreatment files left significantly less guttapercha and sealer than ProFile and H-file. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Rotary systems in combination with gutta-percha solvents can perform superiorly as compared to the time tested traditional hand instrumentation in root canal retreatment.