Factors Associated with Time to Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormones and Puberty Blockers at a Pediatric Clinic Serving Transgender and Nonbinary Youth.

Purpose: To describe barriers to care for a cohort of transgender and nonbinary (TNB) youth and examine factors associated with delays in receiving puberty blockers (PBs) or gender-affirming hormones (GAHs). Methods: We used longitudinal data from a prospective cohort of TNB youth seeking care at a multidisciplinary pediatric gender clinic between August 2017 and June 2018. We calculated the time between (i) initial clinic contact, (ii) phone intake, (iii) first medical appointment, and (iv) initiating PBs/GAHs. We estimated Kaplan-Meier curves for each time-to-care interval and used Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for factors hypothesized to be barriers and facilitators of care. Results: Our cohort included 104 youth aged 13-20 years. The median time from contacting the clinic to initiating PBs/GAHs was 307 days (range, 54-807). Lower income level, Medicaid insurance, and lack of family support were associated with longer times from contacting the clinic to completing the first medical appointment. In addition, older youth experienced longer times to first medical appointment relative to youth aged 13-14 years. Youth younger than 18 years of age who did not complete a mental health assessment before their first medical appointment experienced delays from first medical appointment to initiating PBs/GAHs (HR=0.44, 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.88). Conclusion: Certain subsets of youth disproportionately experienced delays in receiving gender-affirming medications, and these factors varied by stage of care engagement. Given the association between gender-affirming care and improved mental health, identifying sociostructural and clinic-level barriers to care is critically important to facilitating more equitable access.

Trans Youth Talk Back: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Transgender Minors' Accounts of Healthcare Access.

Contemporary transgender youth in the U.S. today face increasing stigmatization as extraordinary legislative attacks intensify discrimination and exclusion of these young people in healthcare, recreation, and school life. These attacks reflect broader political, religious, and cultural ideologies embedded in systems of power that regulate the provision of healthcare for American transgender youth. We apply Foucauldian discourse analysis and a theory-driven conceptual framework for structural analysis of transgender health inequities-Intersectionality Research for Transgender Health Justice-to identify discourses youth encounter within healthcare practice. We analyzed data from interviews conducted in Western Washington State with youth ages 13-17 (n =11) and asked how transgender subjectivity was constructed in their accounts and in what ways youth made use of the discursive resources available to them when navigating systems of care. Three sets of discourses-discourses of normativity, discourses of temporality, and discourse of access-characterized participants' narratives. We discuss how participants negotiated discursively situated systems of power in order to ensure their safety and access to care.

Community and Provider Perspectives on Molecular HIV Surveillance and Cluster Detection and Response for HIV Prevention: Qualitative Findings From King County, Washington.

ABSTRACT: Responding quickly to HIV outbreaks is one of four pillars of the U.S. Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative. Inclusion of cluster detection and response in the fourth pillar of EHE has led to public discussion concerning bioethical implications of cluster detection and response and molecular HIV surveillance (MHS) among public health authorities, researchers, and community members. This study reports on findings from a qualitative analysis of interviews with community members and providers regarding their knowledge and perspectives of MHS. We identified five key themes: (a) context matters, (b) making sense of MHS, (c) messaging, equity, and resource prioritization, (d) operationalizing confidentiality, and (e) stigma, vulnerability, and power. Inclusion of community perspectives in generating innovative approaches that address bioethical concerns related to the use of MHS data is integral to ensure that widely accessible information about the use of these data is available to a diversity of community members and providers.