Branch retinal vein occlusion treated with anti-VEGF: to switch or not to switch?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual outcomes after switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab or aflibercept in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: A retrospective, multi-center, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with BRVO and were treated with at least 3 bevacizumab injections, before anti VEGF switch. METHODS: The follow-up period was 36 months, and the primary study outcomes assessed changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after anti VEGF switch. RESULTS: A total of 263 eyes of 263 patients with a mean age of 71.5 ± 11.2 years of which 50% were of male gender met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 175 eyes did not undergo switch, whereas 88 eyes underwent anti-VEGF switch. There was not a significant difference in mean age (p = 0.634) and gender (p = 0.269) between the groups. Baseline BCVA of the no-switch group was 0.47 ± 0.43 logMAR (20/59 Snellen) versus 0.6 ± 0.49 logMAR (20/79 Snellen) (p = 0.031) in the switch group, and at 36-months it was 0.41 ± 0.39 (20/51 Snellen) logMAR versus 0.54 ± 0.49 logMAR (20/69 Snellen) (p = 0.035), respectively. The difference between the rate of change in BCVA per year was insignificant between groups (p = 0.414). In multivariate analysis, baseline BCVA was the single significant predictor for switch (beta 0.137, p = 0.035). Patients with more than one anti-VEGF switch suffer from decrease in BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Worse baseline BCVA is a significant predictor for anti-VEGF switch execution, though the switch has no significant impact on the change in BCVA over time. Multiple anti-VEGF switch is not recommended.

Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot's Interpretation of Clinical Ophthalmic Images.

Importance: Ophthalmology is reliant on effective interpretation of multimodal imaging to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The new ability of ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI) to interpret ophthalmic images has not yet been explored. Objective: To evaluate the performance of the novel release of an artificial intelligence chatbot that is capable of processing imaging data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a publicly available dataset of ophthalmic cases from OCTCases, a medical education platform based out of the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences at the University of Toronto, with accompanying clinical multimodal imaging and multiple-choice questions. Across 137 available cases, 136 contained multiple-choice questions (99%). Exposures: The chatbot answered questions requiring multimodal input from October 16 to October 23, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the accuracy of the chatbot in answering multiple-choice questions pertaining to image recognition in ophthalmic cases, measured as the proportion of correct responses. χ2 Tests were conducted to compare the proportion of correct responses across different ophthalmic subspecialties. Results: A total of 429 multiple-choice questions from 136 ophthalmic cases and 448 images were included in the analysis. The chatbot answered 299 of multiple-choice questions correctly across all cases (70%). The chatbot's performance was better on retina questions than neuro-ophthalmology questions (77% vs 58%; difference = 18%; 95% CI, 7.5%-29.4%; χ21 = 11.4; P < .001). The chatbot achieved a better performance on nonimage-based questions compared with image-based questions (82% vs 65%; difference = 17%; 95% CI, 7.8%-25.1%; χ21 = 12.2; P < .001).The chatbot performed best on questions in the retina category (77% correct) and poorest in the neuro-ophthalmology category (58% correct). The chatbot demonstrated intermediate performance on questions from the ocular oncology (72% correct), pediatric ophthalmology (68% correct), uveitis (67% correct), and glaucoma (61% correct) categories. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the recent version of the chatbot accurately responded to approximately two-thirds of multiple-choice questions pertaining to ophthalmic cases based on imaging interpretation. The multimodal chatbot performed better on questions that did not rely on the interpretation of imaging modalities. As the use of multimodal chatbots becomes increasingly widespread, it is imperative to stress their appropriate integration within medical contexts.

Treatment patterns and visual acuity change of AMD patients, before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: A large cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the changes in treatment patterns before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients. METHODS: A multi-centre, retrospective, observational study of consecutive nAMD patients during 2019-2021. Data collected included demographics, BCVA, dates of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections and clinic visits. RESULTS: A total of 1652 eyes of 1652 nAMD patients were included, out of which 850 eyes were assessed in 2019 (pre-COVID-19), 630 eyes were assessed in 2020 (COVID-19) and 974 eyes were assessed in 2021 (post-COVID-19). During the COVID-19 period, the mean number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower than the corresponding pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 periods (5.55 compared to 6.13 and 6.60, respectively p < 0.01). A constant lower ratio of injections per patient/month was observed during COVID-19 compared to previous and following years, with a notable decline during March-April, reaching a ratio of 0.4 in 2020 versus 0.65 in 2019 and 0.62 in 2021 (p < 0.01). Baseline BCVA (0.825, p < 0.001), number of injections (-0.007, p < 0.001), gender (-0.027, p = 0.037) and age (0.004, p < 0.001) were shown to be significant predictors of final BCVA. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 period, patients were treated with significantly less intravitreal anti-VEGF injection compared to the previous year with compensation in the following year. These changes in treatment patterns did not have a significant impact on BCVA outcomes. Age, gender, baseline BCVA and number of injections are predictors of final visual outcomes.

Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Elderly Patients.

PURPOSE: To assess clinical outcomes in elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients aged ≥ 75 years with primary RRD undergoing PnR. METHODS: This study evaluates clinical outcomes among eligible patients who presented from October 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022, with a minimum of 3 months' follow-up. There were no limitations with respect to the number, size, or location of retinal breaks. Exclusion criteria included significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy or previous retinal detachment repair in the index eye, inability to maintain the postoperative posturing requirements or inability to carry out adequate examination of the peripheral retina because of media opacity. Lens status did not impact the decision to offer PnR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pneumatic retinopexy primary anatomic reattachment rate and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months. RESULTS: Eighty patients with a mean age of 80.6 ± 4.6 years were included in this study; 35% (28/80) were phakic and 34% (27/80) presented with a fovea-on RRD. The mean number of breaks in the detached retina was 1.52 ± 1.13, and the mean number of quadrants of detached retina was 2.35 ± 0.93. The primary anatomic reattachment rate at 3 months after PnR was 78.8% (63/80), whereas the remaining 21.2% (17/80) failed PnR and underwent an operating room procedure. There was a statistically significant improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.29 ± 0.94 and 0.69 ± 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis that only included patients aged > 80 years was also performed, with a total of 39 patients with a mean age of 84.4 ± 3.5 years. The primary anatomic reattachment rate with PnR in this subgroup was 74.4% (29/39), with a statistically significant improvement in BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.4 ± 1.05 and 0.77 ± 0.70, respectively; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients treated with PnR for primary RRD had relatively comparable primary anatomic reattachment rates with other surgical techniques such as pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle. Pneumatic retinopexy is an effective, minimally invasive office-based procedure that may be desirable for some elderly patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdowns' Impact on Visual Acuity of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Large Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of unplanned treatment gap, secondary to COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, on visual acuity in previously treated diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study of DME patients, previously treated with anti-VEGF injections, who were followed up during COVID-19 pandemic (2020) compared to pre-CO-VID-19 period (2019). RESULTS: A total of 634 DME patients with a mean age of 68.4 years met the inclusion criteria, 385 were assessed in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 239 patients assessed in 2020 (COVID-19). Baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among patients in 2019 and 2020 was 0.52 ± 0.44, 0.45 ± 0.43 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, respectively). There was no significant difference between the years 2020 and 2019 in baseline BCVA (p = 0.07). Mean number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower (5 vs. 6, p < 0.01), with a major lower ratio of injections per patient in the COVID-19 first lockdown period (March-June 2020) in the COVID-19 group. Baseline BCVA (p < 0.01) was the only significant predictor of final BCVA. Number of injections, age, gender, and the year were not found as predictors of final BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of DME patients, an unplanned delay in treatment with anti-VEGF injections for 2-3 months, due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, had no significance impact on visual acuity. For most patients, returning to routine treatment regimen was sufficient for maintaining BCVA.

Postponed care due to COVID-19 lockdown impact on visual acuity of retinal vein occlusion patients: a large cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of postponed care attributed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns on visual acuity and the number of anti-VEGF injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive RVO patients previously treated with anti-VEGF injections, which compared data from pre- (2019) and during (2020) COVID-19 lockdown period. RESULTS: A total of 814 RVO patients with a mean age of 72.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 439 patients were assessed in 2019 and 375 in 2020. There was no significant difference between the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 period in terms of baseline and final BCVA (p = 0.7 and 0.9 respectively), but there was a significantly reduced mean number of anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 period (5.0 and. 5.9 respectively, p < 0.01), with a constant lower ratio of injections per patient. A noticeable decline was found during March-May (p < 0.01) in 2020. Baseline BCVA (0.69, p < 0.01) and the number of injections (- 0.01, p = 0.01) were predictors of final BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of RVO patients, during 2020 lockdowns imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant reduction in the annual number of anti-VEGF injections was noted. The postponed care did not result in a significant impact on the final BCVA. Baseline BCVA and the number of annual injections serve as predictors for final BCVA in RVO patients.

Is There a Dose-Response Relationship? Real-World Outcomes of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: The aim of study was to explore the dose-response relationship of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, with bevacizumab as 1st-line treatment, on the visual-acuity (VA) outcome during the first year of treatment in neovascular AMD (nAMD) patients in real-life conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study at the Ophthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Medical Center. Inclusion criterion was naive AMD patients treated with anti-VEGF injections between the years 2017-2020. Electronic medical records were scanned using the MDClone software, and data from time of diagnosis, containing baseline VA, final VA, number of injections, and the injected agent, were gathered. Subjects were divided into three groups based on their baseline VA ("good," "middle," and "low"). RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were included. The cohort demonstrated a statistically nonsignificant correlation with a positive trend between the log transformation of the number of annual injections and the change in VA (p = 0.145). However, a significant correlation was established within the "low-VA" group (p = 0.015). The "good-" and "middle-VA" groups did not reach statistical significance. Baseline VA was the single significant predictor for VA gain within patients with baseline VA of 6/12 or less. CONCLUSIONS: A dose-response relationship between anti-VEGF injections and the VA outcome was found only for patients with low baseline VA. Individual patient characteristics might need to be taken into account to customize treatment regimen and improve visual outcome.

IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC LOCKDOWNS ON VISUAL ACUITY OF PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AMD: A Large Cohort.

PURPOSE: Evaluating the impact of delayed care, secondary to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns, on visual acuity in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, study of patients with nAMD previously treated with anti-VEGF injections who were followed up during 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and compared with patients with nAMD during 2020 (COVID-19). RESULTS: A total of 1,192 patients with nAMD with a mean age of 81.5 years met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 850 patients were assessed in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 630 patients were assessed in 2020 (COVID-19). Three hundred eight patients were assessed through both 2019 and 2020 and thus were included in both cohorts. There was no significant difference between 2020 and 2019 in baseline and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; P = 0.342 and P = 0.911, respectively). The mean number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower (5.55 vs. 6.13, P < 0.01), with constant lower ratio of injections per patient in the COVID-19 period. Baseline BCVA (0.859, P < 0.01), number of injections (-0.006, P = 0.01), and age (0.003, P < 0.01) were predictors of final BCVA. CONCLUSION: In patients with nAMD, delayed care secondary to COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns has no statistically significant impact on BCVA. Best-corrected visual acuity, older age, and lower number of yearly anti-VEGF injections are predictors for decrease BCVA.

Structure-Functional Basis of Ion Transport in Sodium-Calcium Exchanger (NCX) Proteins.

The membrane-bound sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) proteins shape Ca2+ homeostasis in many cell types, thus participating in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes. Determination of the crystal structure of an archaeal NCX (NCX_Mj) paved the way for a thorough and systematic investigation of ion transport mechanisms in NCX proteins. Here, we review the data gathered from the X-ray crystallography, molecular dynamics simulations, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass-spectrometry (HDX-MS), and ion-flux analyses of mutants. Strikingly, the apo NCX_Mj protein exhibits characteristic patterns in the local backbone dynamics at particular helix segments, thereby possessing characteristic HDX profiles, suggesting structure-dynamic preorganization (geometric arrangements of catalytic residues before the transition state) of conserved α1 and α2 repeats at ion-coordinating residues involved in transport activities. Moreover, dynamic preorganization of local structural entities in the apo protein predefines the status of ion-occlusion and transition states, even though Na⁺ or Ca2+ binding modifies the preceding backbone dynamics nearby functionally important residues. Future challenges include resolving the structural-dynamic determinants governing the ion selectivity, functional asymmetry and ion-induced alternating access. Taking into account the structural similarities of NCX_Mj with the other proteins belonging to the Ca2+/cation exchanger superfamily, the recent findings can significantly improve our understanding of ion transport mechanisms in NCX and similar proteins.