Outcomes after treatment of nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis with ceftiofur hydrochloride for 2 or 5 days compared with negative control.

A study was conducted at 3 commercial dairies in California to compare outcomes of treating nonsevere (mild and moderate) gram-negative (GN) clinical mastitis (CM) with intramammary (IMM) ceftiofur HCl (125 mg of ceftiofur HCl per tube) in either 2-d (SP2) or 5-d (SP5) treatment programs compared with nontreatment (CON). In addition, we contrasted results from cases classified as mild and moderate. Four hundred fifteen cases were included in the final dataset, including 135 CON, 133 SP2, and 147 SP5. Milk from quarters with CM was sampled for on-farm culture (OFC) to differentiate gram-positive (GP) and GN bacteria, with results known within 24 h. Those with GN infections were randomly assigned to experimental groups, while those with GP, mixed infections, and contaminated samples did not continue in the study and received standard farm therapy. For cows with GN infections, a sample was submitted for MALDI-TOF assay. Only nonsevere cases were enrolled, and all quarters yielded monocultures of GN species. Clinical scores were obtained 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 21, and 28 ± 3 d relative to enrollment. Milk samples were collected from quarters 14, 21, and 28 ± 3 d after enrollment, and submitted for routine culture and, when appropriate, submitted to MALDI-TOF evaluation. For many response criteria, there were significant interactions between treatments and CM severity scores at the time of enrollment, with effectiveness of ceftiofur HCl treatment being more beneficial compared with CON as mastitis clinical severity increased. While most treatment responses were significant for animals with mild or moderate GN mastitis, the largest responses were noted among cows with moderate CM cases.

A vanguard randomised feasibility trial comparing three regimens of peri-operative oxygen therapy on recovery after major surgery.

International recommendations encourage liberal administration of oxygen to patients having surgery under general anaesthesia, ostensibly to reduce surgical site infection. However, the optimal oxygen regimen to minimise postoperative complications and enhance recovery from surgery remains uncertain. The hospital operating theatre randomised oxygen (HOT-ROX) trial is a multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial designed to assess the effect of a restricted, standard care, or liberal peri-operative oxygen therapy regimen on days alive and at home after surgery in adults undergoing prolonged non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. Here, we report the findings of the internal vanguard feasibility phase of the trial undertaken in four large metropolitan hospitals in Australia and New Zealand that included the first 210 patients of a planned overall 2640 trial sample, with eight pre-specified endpoints evaluating protocol implementation and safety. We screened a total of 956 participants between 1 September 2019 and 26 January 2021, with data from 210 participants included in the analysis. Median (IQR [range]) time-weighted average intra-operative Fi O2 was 0.30 (0.26-0.35 [0.20-0.59]) and 0.47 (0.44-0.51 [0.37-0.68]) for restricted and standard care, respectively (mean difference (95%CI) 0.17 (0.14-0.20), p < 0.001). Median time-weighted average intra-operative Fi O2 was 0.83 (0.80-0.85 [0.70-0.91]) for liberal oxygen therapy (mean difference (95%CI) compared with standard care 0.36 (0.33-0.39), p < 0.001). All feasibility endpoints were met. There were no significant patient adverse events. These data support the feasibility of proceeding with the HOT-ROX trial without major protocol modifications.

A pilot randomised controlled trial of the management of systolic blood pressure during endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke.

It is unknown whether systolic blood pressure augmentation during endovascular thrombectomy improves clinical outcomes. This pilot randomised controlled trial aimed to assess the feasibility of differential systolic blood pressure targeting during endovascular thrombectomy procedures for anterior circulation ischaemic stroke. Fifty-one eligible patients fulfilling the national criteria for endovascular thrombectomy were randomly assigned to receive either standard or augmented systolic blood pressure management from the start of anaesthesia to recanalisation of the target vessel. Systolic blood pressure targets for the standard and augmented groups were 130-150 mmHg and 160-180 mmHg, respectively. The study achieved all feasibility targets, including a recruitment rate of 3.5 participants per week and median (IQR [range]) of mean systolic blood pressure separation between groups of 139 (135-143 [115-154]) vs. 167 (150-175 [113-188]) mmHg, p < 0.001. Data completeness was 99%. Independent functional recovery at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale 0, 1 or 2) was achieved in 30 (59%) patients, which is consistent with previously published data. There were no safety concerns with trial procedures. In conclusion, a large randomised controlled efficacy trial of standard vs. augmented systolic blood pressure management during endovascular thrombectomy is feasible.

National risk prediction model for perioperative mortality in non-cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many multivariable models to calculate mortality risk after surgery are limited by insufficient sample size at development or by application to cohorts distinct from derivation populations. The aims of this study were to validate the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) for a New Zealand population and to develop an extended NZRISK model to calculate 1-month, 1-year and 2-year mortality after non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: Data from the New Zealand National Minimum Data Set for patients having surgery between January 2013 and December 2014 were used to validate SORT. A random 75 per cent split of the data was used to develop the NZRISK model, which was validated in the other 25 per cent of the data set. RESULTS: External validation of SORT in the 360 140 patients who underwent surgery in the study period showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value of 0·906) but poor calibration (McFadden's pseudo-R2 0·137, calibration slope 5·32), indicating it was invalid in this national surgical population. Internal validation of the NZRISK model, which incorporates sex and ethnicity in addition to the variables used in SORT for 1-month, 1-year and 2-year outcomes, demonstrated excellent discrimination with AUROC values of 0·921, 0·904 and 0·895 respectively, and excellent calibration (McFadden's pseudo-R2 0·275, 0·308 and 0·312 respectively). Calibration slopes were 1·12, 1·02 and 1·02 respectively. CONCLUSION: The SORT performed poorly in this national population. However, inclusion of sex and ethnicity in the NZRISK model improved performance. Calculation of mortality risk beyond 30 days after surgery adds to the utility of this tool for shared decision-making.

ANTECEDENTES: Muchos modelos multivariados de estimación del riesgo de mortalidad después de la cirugía están limitados por haberse desarrollado a partir de tamaños muestrales insuficientes o por haberse aplicados a cohortes distintas de las poblaciones de derivación. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron validar el Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) para una población de Nueva Zelanda y desarrollar un modelo NZRISK extendido para calcular la mortalidad al mes y a los 1 y 2 años de una cirugía no cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Para validar el SORT se utilizó el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de Nueva Zelanda para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía entre enero de 2013 y diciembre de 2014. Se realizó una división aleatoria del 75% de los datos para desarrollar el modelo NZRISK que, posteriormente, se validó en el otro 25% del conjunto de datos. RESULTADOS: La validación externa de SORT en 360.140 pacientes intervenidos en el periodo analizado mostró una buena discriminación (área bajo las curvas de característica operativa del receptor (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUROC) 0,906)) pero con una mala calibración (pseudo-R2 de McFaddens 0,137 y pendiente de calibración 5,32), lo que indicaba que SORT no era válido para esta población quirúrgica nacional. La validación interna del modelo NZRISK, que incorpora el género y la etnia además de las variables utilizadas en el SORT, para los resultados al mes y a los 1 y 2 años demostró una excelente capacidad de discriminación con una AUROC de 0,921, 0,904, 0,895 respectivamente y una calibración excelente, con una pseudo-R2 de McFaddens de 0,275, 0,308 y 0,312 respectivamente. Las pendientes de calibración fueron de 1,12, 1,02 y 1,02, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: El SORT no fue útil en esta población nacional. Sin embargo, la inclusión del género y la etnia en el modelo NZRISK mejoró sus resultados. El cálculo del riesgo de mortalidad más allá de 30 días después de la cirugía añade utilidad a esta herramienta para la toma de decisiones compartida.

Systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: postoperative cancer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The Standardising Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine group was established to derive an appropriate set of endpoints for use in clinical trials related to anaesthesia and perioperative medicine. Anaesthetic or analgesic technique during cancer surgery with curative intent may influence the risk of recurrence or metastasis. However, given the current equipoise in the existing literature, prospective, randomised, controlled trials are necessary to test this hypothesis. As such, a cancer subgroup was formed to derive endpoints related to research in onco-anaesthesia based on a current evidence base, international consensus and expert guidance. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review to identify measures of oncological outcome used in the oncological, surgical, and wider literature. A multiround Delphi consensus process that included up to 89 clinician-researchers was then used to refine a recommended list of endpoints. RESULTS: We identified 90 studies in a literature search, which were the basis for a preliminary list of nine outcome measures and their definitions. A further two were added during the Delphi process. Response rates for Delphi rounds one, two, and three were 88% (n=9), 82% (n=73), and 100% (n=10), respectively. A final list of 10 defined endpoints was refined and developed, of which six secured approval by ≥70% of the group: cancer health related quality of life, days alive and out of hospital at 90 days, time to tumour progression, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (and 5-yr overall survival). CONCLUSION: Standardised endpoints in clinical outcomes studies will support benchmarking and pooling (meta-analysis) of trials. It is therefore recommended that one or more of these consensus-derived endpoints should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials evaluating a causal effect of anaesthesia-analgesia technique on oncological outcomes.

A pilot study using preoperative cerebral tissue oxygen saturation to stratify cardiovascular risk in major non-cardiac surgery.

This prospective pilot study evaluated whether low preoperative cerebral tissue oxygen saturation is associated with unfavourable outcomes after major elective non-cardiac surgery. Eighty-one patients over 60 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4, were recruited. Resting cerebral tissue oxygen saturation was recorded on room air, and after oxygen supplementation, using cerebral oximetry. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse event of combined mortality or severe morbidity, and the secondary outcome was 30-day new disability. Eleven patients (13.6%) suffered a major adverse event, and 28 patients (34.6%) experienced new disability. Room air cerebral tissue oxygen saturation was significantly different between patients who had a major adverse event, 67% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65-70) versus unaffected, 71% (95% CI 70-72; P=0.04). No statistical difference was found between patients for new disability (range 70%-74%; P=0.73). Room air cerebral tissue oxygen saturation was significantly associated with major adverse events (odds ratio 1.36 (95% CI 1.03-1.79), P=0.03). Saturation levels ≤68% carried a positive likelihood ratio of 2.2 for death or severe morbidity, P=0.04. A definitive trial is required to confirm if cerebral oximetry can be used to stratify the cardiovascular risk of patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery.

Intraoperative dexamethasone does not increase the risk of postoperative wound infection: a propensity score-matched post hoc analysis of the ENIGMA-II trial (EnDEX).

BACKGROUND: In a post hoc analysis of the ENIGMA-II trial, we sought to determine whether intraoperative dexamethasone was associated with adverse safety outcomes. METHODS: Inverse probability weighting with estimated propensity scores was used to determine the association of dexamethasone administration with postoperative infection, quality of recovery, and adverse safety outcomes for 5499 of the 7112 non-cardiac surgery subjects enrolled in ENIGMA-II. RESULTS: Dexamethasone was administered to 2178 (40%) of the 5499 subjects included in this analysis and was not associated with wound infection [189 (8.7%) vs 275 (8.3%); propensity score-adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.34; P=0.38], severe postoperative nausea and vomiting on day 1 [242 (7.3%) vs 189 (8.7%); propensity score-adjusted RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.86-1.30; P=0.59], quality of recovery score [median 14, interquartile range (IQR) 12-15, vs median 14, IQR 12-16, P=0.10), length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit [propensity score-adjusted median (IQR) 2.0 (1.3, 2.9) vs 1.9 (1.3, 3.1), P=0.60], or the primary outcome of the main trial. Dexamethasone administration was associated with a decrease in fever on days 1-3 [182 (8.4%) vs 488 (14.7%); RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.5-0.74; P<0.001] and shorter lengths of stay in hospital [propensity score-adjusted median (IQR) 5.0 (2.9, 8.2) vs 5.3 (3.1, 9.1), P<0.001]. Neither diabetes mellitus nor surgical wound contamination status altered these outcomes. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone administration to high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients did not increase the risk of postoperative wound infection or other adverse events up to day 30, and appears to be safe in patients either with or without diabetes mellitus. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00430989.

Accuracy and reliability of the i-STAT point-of-care device for the determination of haemoglobin concentration before and after major blood loss.

We investigated the accuracy of i-STAT(®) (Abbott Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) haemoglobin (Hb) measurement in surgical patients with an estimated blood loss of ≥25% of total blood volume. Blood tests for i-STAT(®) Hb, laboratory Hb (Sysmex XE-2100(™), Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and total plasma proteins were obtained at the start of surgery (T=0) and when an estimated 25% total blood volume loss had occurred (T=1). Thirty-one patients were recruited. The coefficient of variation of the paired i-STAT(®) Hb estimates was 2.8% and 2.9% at T=0 and T=1, respectively. The mean difference between i-STAT(®) and laboratory Hb was -7.6 g/l (standard deviation 6.5) at T=0 and -5.1 g/l (standard deviation 12) at T=1. The mean total plasma protein difference (total plasma protein T=0 minus T=1) was 13.6 g/l (95% confidence interval 10.2 to 17.0). There was poor correlation between total plasma protein and bias in i-STAT(®) measurements. The i-STAT(®) Hb had an acceptable coefficient of variation, but the Hb levels were lower than those estimated by the laboratory. The standard deviation of i-STAT(®) Hb was greater after ≥25% estimated total blood volume loss. Clinicians should not use the i-STAT(®) Hb in isolation for clinical decision-making when considering blood transfusion in a situation of 25% or greater blood loss.

Comparing violence in schizophrenia patients with and without comorbid substance-use disorders to community controls.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined crime and violence in patients with schizophrenia with and without comorbid substance-use disorders. METHOD: A case-linkage design was used to compare patterns of violence and offending between 4168 schizophrenia patients drawn from a state-wide public mental health register, both with and without comorbid substance-use disorders, and a randomly selected community control group who had never been diagnosed with schizophrenia. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients were significantly more likely than controls to be guilty of violent and non-violent offences, and to have been involved in family violence. Even schizophrenia patients without comorbid substance-use disorders had a significantly elevated risk of violence; this group were more than twice as likely as controls to have a violent conviction. The elevation of violence risk in schizophrenia patients was higher in females (OR = 8.59) than males (OR = 2.25). CONCLUSION: The increased risk of violent offending in schizophrenia cannot be solely attributed to the effects of comorbid substance misuse, although comorbidity certainly heightens the likelihood of criminality. In addition to offending, people with schizophrenia are more likely than community controls to come to the attention of police via their involvement in family violence incidents. Schizophrenia is a particularly strong risk factor for violence in females.

Beta-blocker management in high-risk patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery: before and after the POISE Trial.

The POISE Trial was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the effectiveness of perioperative beta-blockade in preventing cardiac events including death in 8351 patients. Our hypothesis was that knowledge of the results of the POISE Trial would either increase or decrease the use of effective perioperative beta-blockade, depending on the result. Patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery and at risk of perioperative cardiac events were recruited in two cohorts before and after the release of the POISE Trial results. Effective perioperative beta-blockade was defined as heart rate <65 beats per minute for at least 80% of the perioperative period in patients prescribed beta-blockers. Effective perioperative beta-blockade was achieved in 22 (11.5%) of 191 patients prescribed perioperative beta-blockade in the first cohort (n=392) and seven (6%) of 118 patients in the second cohort (n=241) (P=0.10). Effective heart rate control was achieved in 29 (9%) patients prescribed perioperative beta-blockers compared with 10 (3%) patients not prescribed perioperative beta-blockers (P=0.001). The rate of implementation of effective beta-blockade was low before POISE and this did not change significantly after publication. Our finding does not provide reliable evidence of a change in practice as a result of the POISE Trial.

Schizophrenia disorders, substance abuse and prior offending in a sequential series of 435 homicides.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between committing homicide, the presence of schizophrenia, substance misuse and past criminality. METHOD: The study employed a data linkage design, using contacts recorded on two statewide databases, one of which recorded public mental health services contacts and the second of which recorded contacts with the police. The estimated rates of schizophrenia disorders, substance abuse and criminal convictions found among a population of 435 homicide offenders were contrasted with estimated rates in two composite comparison samples. RESULTS: Of the 435 offenders, 38 (8.7%) had been diagnosed with a schizophrenia disorder, which was RR 13.11 (95% CI 9.14-18.80) times more likely than a comparison sample. Rates of known substance abuse between homicide offenders with and without schizophrenia and community-dwelling residents with schizophrenia did not differ significantly. However, these rates were higher than those found in the general community. A similar pattern emerged for comparisons regarding offending histories between these same groups. CONCLUSION: The association between homicidal violence and having a schizophrenia disorder cannot be explained away simply on the basis of either comorbid substance abuse or prior criminal offending.

Design and development of a novel automatic valve system for long-term catheterized urinary incontinence patients.

It has been estimated that over 3 million patients in the UK suffer from urinary incontinence, the result of which is often long-term catheterization. However, many catheters block prematurely through encrustation and their continuous drainage limits bladder rehabilitation. Although evidence shows that a catheter valve may overcome such weaknesses, only manual valves are currently available and many patients are not able to benefit from these owing to a lack of manual dexterity. A novel electronically controlled automatic valve system, the Shan-Lai (SL) valve system, has been designed and prototyped. The prototype is compact, reliable, and cost effective, and it has low power consumption. The mass of the overall packaged valve system is 34.2 g and it measures 4.5 cm x 4.5 cm x 1.2 cm. With an orifice of 3 mm diameter, the SL valve has achieved high flowrates with relatively low energy consumption. A flowrate-energy relationship (FER) has been introduced to assess the performance of a catheter valve, and the SL valve system prototype has achieved an FER of 0.66 m/s(-1) mJ(-1) while a commercially available electronic valve has an FER of 0.28 m/s(-1) mJ(-1). The valve demonstrated outstanding mechanical reliability after a series of performance tests and also indicated remarkable encrustation resistance in the vicinity of the valve during an in-vitro test.

Recovery from bispectral index-guided anaesthesia in a large randomized controlled trial of patients at high risk of awareness.

Electroencephalographic monitors of anaesthetic depth are reported to assist anaesthetists in reducing recovery times. We explored the effect of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring on recovery times in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 2,463 patients at high risk of awareness. Patients were randomized to BIS-guided anaesthesia or routine care. In the BIS group, anaesthesia was adjusted to maintain a BIS value of 40-60 from the commencement of laryngoscopy to the start of wound closure, and 55-70 during wound closure. In the routine care group, anaesthesia was adjusted according to traditional clinical signs. In multivariate models, BIS monitoring, female gender, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status and shorter duration of anaesthesia predicted faster time to eye-opening after anaesthesia, and faster time to post-anaesthesia care unit discharge. BIS monitoring did not affect times to tracheal extubation among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. We conclude that BIS monitoring has statistically significant, but clinically modest, effects on recovery times in high risk surgical patients.

Drug error in anaesthetic practice: a review of 896 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study database.

Eight hundred and ninety-six incidents relating to drug error were reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Syringe and drug preparation errors accounted for 452 (50.4%) incidents, including 169 (18.9%) involving syringe swaps where the drug was correctly labelled but given in error, and 187 (20.8%) due to selection of the wrong ampoule or drug labelling errors. The drugs most commonly involved were neuromuscular blocking agents, followed by opioids. Equipment misuse or malfunction accounted for a further 234 (26.1%) incidents; incorrect route of administration 126 (14.1%) incidents; and communication error 35 (3.9%) incidents. The outcomes of these events included minor morbidity in 105 (11.7%), major morbidity in 42 (4.7%), death in three (0.3%) and awareness under anaesthesia in 40 (4.4%) incidents. Contributing factors included inattention, haste, drug labelling error, communication failure and fatigue. Factors minimising the events were prior experience and training, rechecking equipment and monitors capable of detecting the incident. The information gained suggests areas where improved guidelines are required to reduce the incidence of drug error. Further research is required into the effectiveness of preventive strategies.