Safety, tolerability, and activity of ALV003: results from two phase 1 single, escalating-dose clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease is the most common hereditary autoimmune disease in humans. The only treatment option for non-refractory celiac disease patients is adherence to a strict life-long gluten-free diet, which often fails to normalize small bowel histology. ALV003 is a mixture of two proteases that degrades gluten and is in clinical development as an oral therapy for patients with celiac disease. AIMS: The safety, tolerability, and activity of ALV003 were assessed in two phase 1 clinical trials. METHODS: In study 1 (N = 28) the study drug was administered in the fasted state; in study 2 (N = 53) the study drug was administered together with a gluten-containing meal. Both studies were single-dose, single-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trials. ALV003 was dosed at escalating dose levels by cohort (100, 300, 900, and 1,800 mg) and gastric samples were aspirated using a nasogastric tube. Adverse events, serum drug levels, and anti-drug antibody titers were measured. Gastric samples were assessed for ALV003 enzymatic activity over time (gastric pharmacokinetics) and gluten degradation (gastric pharmacodynamics). RESULTS: All doses were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events or allergic reactions were observed. Gastric aspirates collected 30 min following a meal showed that 100 and 300 mg ALV003 degraded 75 ± 10% (N = 8) and 88 ± 5% (N = 8), respectively, of one gram of wheat bread gluten. CONCLUSIONS: ALV003 is an orally active protease that appears to be stable in the fed stomach and degrades dietary gluten in this compartment. Single doses of oral ALV003 were not associated with serious adverse reactions.

The effects of ALV003 pre-digestion of gluten on immune response and symptoms in celiac disease in vivo.

Effective treatment of celiac disease is an unmet medical need. A glutenase that destroys immunogenic gluten peptides may be clinically valuable. Twenty patients with celiac disease were randomly assigned to ingest a large gluten meal (16 g daily for 3 days) pre-treated with ALV003, a mixture of highly specific glutenases (n=10), or pre-treated with placebo (n=10). Peripheral blood T-cell IFN-gamma ELISpot responses to gliadin and an immunogenic 33mer and symptoms were assessed. While baseline IFN-gamma ELISpot responses to gliadin and the 33mer were negative in all patients, a significant ELISpot response to gliadin or the 33mer was observed in 6 of 10 patients consuming placebo-treated gluten and 0 of 10 consuming ALV003 pre-treated gluten (p=0.011). Symptoms typically associated with gluten ingestion occurred in both groups and were not significantly reduced by ALV003 pre-treatment. ALV003 pre-treatment can abolish immune responses induced by gluten in patients with celiac disease.

A phase II study of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, as monotherapy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma.

There is no effective systemic therapy for disseminated metastatic melanoma. Data suggest that endothelin may play a role in pathophysiology of melanoma and that the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan may have anti-tumor activity. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective, proof-of-concept study assessed the effects of bosentan monotherapy (500 mg oral tablets, bid) on tumor response in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma. Patients were treated until disease progression, death or serious adverse event leading to premature study drug discontinuation. Tumor response was assessed at 6-weekly intervals using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Among the 35 patients included in this study with stage IV metastatic melanoma, 21 (60%) were stage M1C, 10 (29%) stage M1B and 4 (11%) stage M1A (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] classification). Nine patients (26%) had received prior therapy for stage IV melanoma. Disease stabilization was observed in 6 of the 32 patients analyzed per protocol at week 6 with confirmatory evaluation at week 12, 5 of whom were still stable at > or =24 weeks. Of the 6 patients with disease stabilization, 2 were stage M1A, 1 was stage M1B and the remaining 3 were stage M1C. Partial or complete response was not observed. Progressive disease was observed in 17 (49%) patients at week 12 and in 25 (71%) patients at the end of the study (data base closure). The most frequent adverse events were typical for the underlying disease or known to be associated with bosentan: headache (43%), fatigue (34%), nausea (31%), back pain (23%) and abnormal hepatic function (23%). Bosentan might have benefit in disease stabilization in certain patients with metastatic melanoma and deserves further investigation in combination with other anticancer drugs.

Trial to evaluate the management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia during an electrophysiology study with tecadenoson.

BACKGROUND: Tecadenoson is a potent selective A1-adenosine receptor agonist with a dose-dependent negative dromotropic effect on the AV node. Tecadenoson terminates induced paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) without the clinically significant side effects caused by stimulation of other adenosine receptors. This trial was designed to determine a safe and effective tecadenoson bolus for termination of electrophysiologically induced PSVT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a history of symptomatic PSVT and inducible PSVT at the time of a clinically indicated electrophysiology study were randomized into a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Five 2-dose tecadenoson bolus regimens were evaluated versus placebo (75/150, 150/300, 300/600, 450/900, 900 microg/900 microg). The second bolus was administered only if PSVT persisted for 1 minute after the first bolus. Each tecadenoson regimen resulted in a significant therapeutic conversion rate compared with placebo (range, 50.0% to 90.3%, analysis of all patients dosed; n=181; P<0.0005). Conversion by the first bolus was dose related (range: placebo, 3.3% to 86.7% for 900 microg/900 microg). Time to conversion was dose dependent, with a median time of <1 minute for the 3 highest dose regimens. Postconversion arrhythmias were transient, requiring no additional treatment in 4 regimens (including placebo). Transient second- and third-degree heart block occurred at higher doses (300/600, 450/900, 900 microg/900 microg) and was supported with backup pacing when needed. No effect on blood pressure was observed. Ten patients with a history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tolerated tecadenoson without bronchospasm. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an optimal tecadenoson regimen (300 microg/600 microg) that effectively and rapidly converted 90% (28 of 31) of PSVT patients to normal sinus rhythm with no significant adverse effects.

A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a continued need to develop more effective cancer immunotherapy strategies. Exosomes, cell-derived lipid vesicles that express high levels of a narrow spectrum of cell proteins represent a novel platform for delivering high levels of antigen in conjunction with costimulatory molecules. We performed this study to test the safety, feasibility and efficacy of autologous dendritic cell (DC)-derived exosomes (DEX) loaded with the MAGE tumor antigens in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This Phase I study enrolled HLA A2+ patients with pre-treated Stage IIIb (N = 4) and IV (N = 9) NSCLC with tumor expression of MAGE-A3 or A4. Patients underwent leukapheresis to generate DC from which DEX were produced and loaded with MAGE-A3, -A4, -A10, and MAGE-3DPO4 peptides. Patients received 4 doses of DEX at weekly intervals. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and 9 completed therapy. Three formulations of DEX were evaluated; all were well tolerated with only grade 1-2 adverse events related to the use of DEX (injection site reactions (N = 8), flu like illness (N = 1), and peripheral arm pain (N = 1)). The time from the first dose of DEX until disease progression was 30 to 429+ days. Three patients had disease progression before the first DEX dose. Survival of patients after the first DEX dose was 52-665+ days. DTH reactivity against MAGE peptides was detected in 3/9 patients. Immune responses were detected in patients as follows: MAGE-specific T cell responses in 1/3, increased NK lytic activity in 2/4. CONCLUSION: Production of the DEX vaccine was feasible and DEX therapy was well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC. Some patients experienced long term stability of disease and activation of immune effectors.

Termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia by tecadenoson (CVT-510), a novel A1-adenosine receptor agonist.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate tecadenoson safety and efficacy during conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) to sinus rhythm. BACKGROUND: Tecadenoson (CVT-510), a novel adenosine receptor (Ado R) agonist, selectively activates the A1 Ado R and prolongs atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction at doses lower than those required to cause A2 Ado R-mediated coronary and peripheral vasodilation. Unlike adenosine, which non-selectively activates all four Ado R subtypes and produces unwanted effects, tecadenoson appears to terminate AV node-dependent supraventricular tachycardias without hypotension and bronchoconstriction. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, dose escalation study, tecadenoson was administered to 37 patients (AV node re-entrant tachycardia, n = 29; AV re-entrant tachycardia, n = 8) with inducible PSVT sustained for > or =1 min during an electrophysiology study. Seven regimens (0.3 to 15 microg/kg) of up to two identical tecadenoson intravenous bolus doses were administered. RESULTS: After the first or second bolus, PSVT converted to sustained sinus rhythm for > or =5 min in 86.5% (32/37) of the patients, with 91% (29/32) of the conversions occurring after the first bolus (most within 30 s), coincident with anterograde conduction block in the AV node. No effects on sinus cycle length (SCL) or systolic blood pressure were observed. The atrial-His (AH), but not the His-ventricular (HV) interval was prolonged up to 5 min after the final tecadenoson bolus, returning to baseline by 10 min. Tecadenoson was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, tecadenoson rapidly terminated sustained PSVT by depressing AV nodal conduction without causing hypotension. After sinus rhythm restoration, there was minimal AH interval prolongation without HV interval or SCL prolongation.

Pharmacology and therapeutic applications of A1 adenosine receptor ligands.

Adenosine's diverse physiological functions are mediated by four subtypes of receptors (A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3)). The A(1) adenosine receptor pharmacology and therapeutic application of ligands for this receptor are the subjects of this review. A(1) receptors are present on the surface of cells in organs throughout the body. Actions mediated by A(1) receptors include slowing of heart rate and AV nodal conduction, reduction of atrial contractility, attenuation of the stimulatory actions of catecholamines on beta-adrenergic receptors, reduction of lipolysis in adipose tissue, reduction of urine formation, and inhibition of neuronal activity. Although adenosine analogs with high efficacy, affinity, and selectivity for the A(1) receptor are available, the ubiquitous distribution and wide range of physiological actions mediated by A(1) receptors are obstacles to development of therapeutic agents that activate these receptors. However, it may be possible to exploit the high A(1) "receptor reserve" for some actions of adenosine by use of weak (partial) agonists to target these actions while avoiding others for which receptor reserve is low. The presence of high receptor reserves for the anti-arrhythmic and anti-lipolytic actions of adenosine suggests that partial A(1) agonists could be used as anti-arrhythmic and anti-lipolytic agents. In addition, allosteric enhancers of the binding of adenosine to A(1) receptors could be used therapeutically to potentiate desirable effects of endogenous adenosine. Antagonists of the A(1) receptor can increase urine formation, and because they do not decrease renal blood flow, are particularly useful to maintain glomerular filtration in patients having edema secondary to reduced cardiac function.