Influence of 2 caries-detecting devices on clinical decision making and lesion depth for suspicious occlusal lesions: A randomized trial from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

BACKGROUND: A suspicious occlusal carious lesion (SOCL) can be defined as a lesion with no cavitation and no radiographic radiolucency but for which caries is suspected. The authors evaluated whether using a device changed the percentage of SOCLs that were opened surgically and, among those SOCLs that were opened, the proportion that had penetrated into dentin. METHODS: Eighty-two dentists participated. In phase 1 of the study, dentists identified approximately 20 SOCLs, obtained patient consent, and recorded information about the lesion, treatment or treatments, and depth, if opened. Dentists were then randomly assigned into 1 of 3 groups: no device, DIAGNOdent (KaVo), and Spectra (Air Techniques). In phase 2, dentists enrolled approximately 20 additional patients and recorded the same phase 1 information while using the assigned device to help make their treatment decisions. A mixed-model logistic regression was used to determine any differences after randomization in the proportion of lesions opened and, if opened, the proportion of lesions that penetrated into dentin. RESULTS: A total of 1,500 SOCLs were enrolled in each phase. No statistically significant difference was found in the change in proportion of lesions receiving invasive treatment from phase 1 to phase 2 across the 3 groups (P = .33) or in the change in proportion of percentage of opened lesions that extended into dentin (P = .31). CONCLUSION: Caries-detecting devices in the study did not change substantially dentists' decisions to intervene or the accuracy of the intervention decision in predicting lesion penetration into dentin. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The caries-detecting devices tested may not improve dentists' clinical decision making for SOCLs.

Dentists' decision strategies for suspicious occlusal caries lesions in a National Dental PBRN study.

OBJECTIVE: Case presentations (vignettes) were completed by dentists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network study "Decision Aids for the Management of Suspicious Occlusal Caries Lesions (SOCLs)". The objective was to determine dentists' decision strategies for SOCLs. METHODS: 107 dentists viewed a series of 16 vignettes that represented all combinations of 4 clinical cues: color, luster, lesion roughness, and patient-level caries risk. Each vignette included a patient description and a photograph of a tooth presenting the 4 cues. Dentists were asked to decide the likelihood that a suspected lesion extended into dentin. A lens model analysis was used to examine how dentists use these cues in making their decisions. RESULTS: 86% of dentists had a consistent pattern of cue use that defined their decision strategy. On average, 70% of the variance in their decisions was accounted for by their use of the 4 cues. However, there was considerable variability in the individual cues used by each dentist. The percentages of dentists who used the different cues consistently were: luster (58%), color (48%), roughness (36%), and risk (35%). 14% of dentists reliably used only color, 7% used only luster, 4% used only roughness, and 1% used only risk when making SOCL decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The online vignette system suggests that clinical SOCL decision strategies are highly individualized and dentists do not use all cues available to them to make these decisions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Prior to this study, there has been little evidence about how dentists use these cues (either individually or in combination) when judging the extent of caries progression. Such knowledge would be valuable when designing interventions to help dentists maximize the likelihood of appropriate treatment decisions.

Surface characteristics and lesion depth and activity of suspicious occlusal carious lesions: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

BACKGROUND: A lesion on an occlusal tooth surface with no cavitation and no radiographic radiolucency but in which caries is suspected owing to surface roughness, opacities, or staining can be defined as a suspicious occlusal carious lesion (SOCL). The authors' objective was to quantify the characteristics of SOCLs and their relationship to lesion depth and activity after these lesions were opened surgically. METHODS: Ninety-three dentists participated in the study. When a consenting patient had an SOCL, information was recorded about the tooth, lesion, treatment provided, and, if the SOCL was opened surgically, its lesion depth. The Rao-Scott cluster-adjusted χ2 test was used to evaluate associations between lesion depth and color, roughness, patient risk, and luster. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 1,593 SOCLs. Lesion color varied from yellow/light brown (40%) to dark brown/black (47%), with 13% other colors. Most (69%) of SOCLs had a rough surface when examined with an explorer. Over one-third of the SOCLs (39%) were treated surgically. Of the 585 surgically treated SOCLs, 61% had dentinal caries. There were statistically significant associations between lesion depth and color (P = .03), luster (P = .04), and roughness (P = .01). The authors classified 52% of the patients as being at elevated caries risk. The authors found no significant associations between lesion depth and patient risk (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Although statistically significant, the clinical characteristics studied do not provide accurate guidance for making definitive treatment decisions and result in high rates of false positives. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Given that 39% of the opened lesions did not have dentinal caries or were inactive, evidence-based preventive management is an appropriate alternative to surgical intervention.

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence.

This study aimed to find the set of risk indicators best able to predict root caries (RC) incidence in caries-active adults utilizing data from the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT). Five logistic regression models were compared with respect to their predictive performance for incident RC using data from placebo-control participants with exposed root surfaces at baseline and from two study centers with ancillary data collection (n = 155). Prediction performance was assessed from baseline variables and after including ancillary variables [smoking, diet, use of removable partial dentures (RPD), toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance]. A sensitivity analysis added treatment to the models for both the control and treatment participants (n = 301) to predict RC for the control participants. Forty-nine percent of the control participants had incident RC. The model including the number of follow-up years at risk, the number of root surfaces at risk, RC index, gender, race, age, and smoking resulted in the best prediction performance, having the highest AUC and lowest Brier score. The sensitivity analysis supported the primary analysis and gave slightly better performance summary measures. The set of risk indicators best able to predict RC incidence included an increased number of root surfaces at risk and increased RC index at baseline, followed by white race and nonsmoking, which were strong nonsignificant predictors. Gender, age, and increased number of follow-up years at risk, while included in the model, were also not statistically significant. The inclusion of health, diet, RPD use, toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance variables did not improve the prediction performance.

Visual-tactile versus radiographic caries detection agreement in caries-active adults.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to determine a) the extent of agreement between visual-tactile caries examination (VTE) and radiographic examination (RE) in detecting presumptive caries lesions on occlusal and proximal surfaces of posterior teeth of UNC Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial participants; and b) the additional caries diagnostic yield obtained by adding RE to VTE. METHODS: Data consisted of surface-level visual-tactile and radiographic classification of disease (cavitated and noncavitated caries lesions) or nondisease (sound surfaces). Participants (n = 114, adults with ≥12 erupted teeth and 1-10 caries lesions) received baseline VTE by a trained and calibrated examiner, and had interproximal radiographs obtained within 7 months before or after the VTE. Radiographs were assessed independently by two trained and calibrated examiners masked with respect to VTE results. The diagnostic threshold was surface-level disease/nondisease status. Kappa statistics provided an estimate of VTE-RE agreement on diseased surfaces. The additional diagnostic yield of the RE over VTE was calculated as the additional lesions detected radiographically as a percentage of the total number of lesions detected by VTE. RESULTS: Four-hundred ninety-four (51 occlusal, 433 proximal) lesions were detected; of these, 81 (2 occlusal, 79 proximal) lesions were detected by both VTE and RE. Kappa statistics were 0.18 (all surfaces), 0.04 (occlusal), and 0.18 (proximal). The additional diagnostic yield was 69 percent (all surfaces), 55 percent (occlusal), and 71 percent (proximal). CONCLUSIONS: There is poor agreement between VTE and RE to detect caries in posterior teeth of caries-active adults. However, an RE performed within 7 months of a VTE adds caries diagnostic yield in a clinical trial, especially on proximal surfaces.

Results from the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT).

BACKGROUND: Although caries is prevalent in adults, investigators have tested few preventive therapies in adult populations. In a randomized controlled trial, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of xylitol lozenges in preventing caries in adults at elevated risk of developing caries. METHODS: The Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT) was a three-site placebo-controlled randomized trial. Participants (n = 691) aged 21 through 80 years consumed five 1.0-gram xylitol or placebo lozenges daily for 33 months. They underwent clinical examinations at baseline and at 12, 24 and 33 months. RESULTS: Xylitol lozenges reduced the caries increment 10 percent. This reduction, which represented less than one-third of a surface per year, was not statistically significant. There was no indication of a dose-response effect. CONCLUSIONS: Daily use of xylitol lozenges did not result in a statistically or clinically significant reduction in 33-month caries increment among adults at an elevated risk of developing caries. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that xylitol used as a supplement in adults does not reduce their caries experience significantly.

Dental care plan assessment using the CAHPS Dental Plan Survey.

OBJECTIVES: The performance of a recently developed survey instrument that inquires about patients' experiences with the receipt of dental care was examined to evaluate its potential utility as a patient-reported outcome measure for dental care plans. METHODS: Individuals with dental insurance (n = 1,216) were surveyed using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Dental Plan Survey. The instrument's pre-established composite and rating scores were compared across dental insurance carriers (6 most common and all others combined) using ANOVA. In addition, each score was analyzed separately using multivariate regression with respondent and plan characteristics as independent variables. RESULTS: There was significant differentiation among dental insurance carriers for three of the six scores (dental care composite, access to care composite, and dentist rating). Several respondent characteristics were associated with higher scores, including age, race, income level, and oral health self-rating. Having a choice of dental plans, and years with one's dental plan were associated with higher dental plan ratings, while having to find a new dentist to use the plan tended to lower all scores except the cost and services composite. CONCLUSIONS: The results reported here reflect differences among dental insurance carriers, rather than among the many different dental plans offered by those carriers. Nevertheless, the CAHPS instrument scores reflected differences among patients' experiences (composite scores) and ratings (rating scores) across carriers, suggesting both that the instrument should be a useful tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes, and that comparisons of these outcomes should control for respondent characteristics as well as specific plan characteristics.

Risk factors for third molar occlusal caries: a longitudinal clinical investigation.

PURPOSE: To study the third molar occlusal caries incidence and identify related patient-level sociodemographic, dental behavior, and clinical risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was used to study caries risk (crude increment and incidence rate) on retained and erupted to the occlusal plane third molars among a moderate-size (n = 215) group of healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II) young adults (median age, 26 years) followed up for a mean of 4.6 years. Clinical data were gathered by calibrated examiners using visual-tactile and radiographic diagnostic methods on all molar teeth. The covariates included age at enrollment, gender, race, income, education, frequency of dental visits, oral hygiene behaviors, and smoking. Summary statistics and visual methods were used for data description. The analyses relied on bivariate and multivariate methods using generalized estimating equations, extensions of Poisson modeling. RESULTS: Of the 215 patients, 33% developed occlusal caries on 1 or more retained third molars. The incidence rate was 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.13) third molar "increments"/person-year. Those with any molar caries at baseline were 80% more likely to have a new third molar caries lesion at the end of follow-up compared with those with caries-free molars (prevalence ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 3.00). The third molar caries rate was halved for every approximately 9 years of the subjects' baseline age. Favorable oral hygiene behaviors and better socioeconomic status were associated with decreased caries risk. However, independent of other covariates, smoking increased the third molar caries risk twofold. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients from lower socioeconomic strata, smokers, and those with poor oral hygiene behavior are at an increased risk of occlusal caries development on their retained third molars.

Changes over time in the prevalence of caries experience or periodontal pathology on third molars in young adults.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on third molar teeth compared with first and second molars and teeth more anterior from subjects who had data collected over time in a longitudinal clinical study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars and data for at least 4 years after enrollment were included in these analyses. The presence or absence of caries experience on the occlusal surface of the third molars and any surface of the first or second molars was assessed using a visual-tactile caries examination. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was conducted as a measure of clinical periodontal status. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none, and caries experience versus no caries experience. The prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathologic findings at follow-up and the relationship of the occurrence between the third molars and teeth more anterior in the mouth were examined using McNemar's statistics. RESULTS: The follow-up was a median of 6.9 years (interquartile range 4.6 to 7.7 years) for 179 subjects, with a mean age of 29 years. More subjects were female (54%) and white (80%). At follow-up, 85% of the subjects had caries experience detected on the first or second molars, and only 50% had a third molar affected. In contrast, at follow-up, the presence of at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm was marginally more prevalent on the third molars than on the first or second molars (56% and 50%, respectively). Fewer subjects had third molars free of caries experience and periodontal pathology at follow-up compared with at enrollment (28% versus 38%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of both third molar caries experience and third molar periodontal pathology increased from baseline to the follow-up examination. At follow-up, the prevalence of caries experience was greater on the first or second molars than on the third molars, and periodontal pathology were greater on the third molars than on the more anterior teeth.

Prevalence of third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in young adults.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on asymptomatic third molars in young adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study during a 5-year period. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was the measure of clinical periodontal status. The presence or absence of occlusal caries experience (carious lesions or restorations, including sealants) on third molars and on any surface of the first and second molars were assessed using a visual-tactile examination and panoramic radiographs. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none and caries experience versus no caries experience. RESULTS: The data were analyzed from 409 subjects, who averaged 25 years old. More subjects were female (53%) and white (76%). More subjects had at least 1 periodontal probing depth of 4 mm or deeper on a third molar (55%) than on the distal of a second molar (46%). These findings were more likely to be detected around a third molar in subjects with all third molars at the occlusal plane (72%) than in subjects with at least one third molar below (33%). Overall, fewer subjects were affected by third molar caries experience than first or second molars (24% vs 73%, respectively). Of the subset of subjects with all four third molars at the occlusal plane, 26% were affected by both third molar periodontal pathology and caries experience and 16% were caries and periodontal pathology free. CONCLUSIONS: In these cross-sectional analyses, periodontal pathology was detected more frequently on third molars than on first and second molars and caries experience was detected more frequently on first and second molars than on third molars.

Risk indicators for the presence and extent of root caries among caries-active adults enrolled in the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT).

OBJECTIVE: This paper uses baseline data from a randomized clinical trial to evaluate cross-sectional indicators of root caries in caries-active adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults (21-80 years) having at least 12 erupted teeth and between one and ten caries lesions were enrolled. Participants (n = 437) received caries exams by trained, calibrated examiners and responded to baseline demographic and medical-dental questionnaires. We examined associations between baseline characteristics and (1) the presence of any root caries using Mantel-Haenszel hypothesis tests and odds ratio (OR) estimators and (2) the number of root surfaces with caries among study participants with exposed root surfaces (n = 349) using Mantel-Haenszel mean score tests and Mann-Whitney estimators. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for study site and age, male gender [OR, 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08, 2.78], white race (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.43, 3.98), recent dental visit (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.07, 3.66), poor self-described oral health (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.10, 6.39), and recent professional fluoride treatment (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.06, 3.25) were significantly associated with increased odds to have any root caries, and study participants with exposed root surfaces characterized by male gender [Mann-Whitney probability estimate (MW) = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.63), white race (MW, 0.61; 0.55, 0.68), recent dental visit (MW, 0.58; 0.50, 0.67), poor self-described oral health (MW, 0.61; 0.53, 0.69), and flossing at least once per day (MW, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.62) were significantly more likely to have a greater number of root surfaces with caries than a randomly selected study participant from their respective complementary subgroups (female gender, non-white, etc.). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings may help identify individuals at higher root caries risk.

Antibiotic use for treating dental infections in children: a survey of dentists' prescribing practices.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to examine the antibiotic prescribing practices of general and pediatric dentists in the management of odontogenic infections in children. METHODS: The authors relied on a cross-sectional study design to assess the antibiotic prescribing practices of general and pediatric dentists in North Carolina. The survey instrument consisted of five clinical case scenarios that included antibiotic-prescribing decisions in a self-administered questionnaire format. The participants were volunteers attending one of four continuing education courses. The authors invited all pediatric dentists in private practice to participate in the study, as well as general practitioners who treated children in general practice. The authors compared the practitioners' responses for each clinical case scenario with the prescribing guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and the American Dental Association. RESULTS: A total of 154 surveys were completed and returned (55 percent response rate). The mean age of respondents was 47 years, and the mean number of years in practice was 19. Of the 154 overall, 106 (69 percent) were general practitioners and 48 (31 percent) were pediatric dentists. Across the three in-office clinical case scenarios, adherence to professional prescribing guidelines ranged from 10 to 42 percent. For the two weekend scenarios, overall adherence to the professional prescribing guidelines dropped to 14 and 17 percent. Dentists who had completed postgraduate education (n = 73 [51 percent]) were more likely (P < .05) to have adhered to published guidelines in prescribing antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey show that dentists' adherence to professional guidelines for prescribing antibiotics for odontogenic infections in children was low. There appears to be a lack of concordance between recommended professional guidelines and the antibiotic prescribing practices of dentists. Clearer, more specific guidelines may lead to improved adherence among dentists.

Clinical technical performance of dental therapists in Alaska.

BACKGROUND: The Alaska Dental Health Aide Therapist program has matured to the point that therapists have been in practice for up to four years. METHODS: A case-study evaluation of the program included assessments of the clinical technical performance of five of these therapists practicing in clinics in small Alaskan villages and towns. RESULTS: The results indicate that therapists are performing at an acceptable level, with short-term restorative outcomes comparable with those of dentists treating the same populations. CONCLUSIONS: Therapists' performance when operating within their scope of practice suggested no reason for continued close scrutiny. Further evaluations of therapists should shift their principal focus from clinical technical performance of therapists to effectiveness of the therapist program in improving the targeted population's oral health. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Therapists are capable of providing acceptable restorative treatment under indirect supervision.

Design of the xylitol for adult caries trial (X-ACT).

BACKGROUND: Dental caries incidence in adults is similar to that in children and adolescents, but few caries preventive agents have been evaluated for effectiveness in adults populations. In addition, dentists direct fewer preventive services to their adult patients. Xylitol, an over-the-counter sweetener, has shown some potential as a caries preventive agent, but the evidence for its effectiveness is not yet conclusive and is based largely on studies in child populations. METHODS/DESIGN: X-ACT is a three-year, multi-center, placebo controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that tests the effects of daily use of xylitol lozenges versus placebo lozenges on the prevention of adult caries. The trial has randomized 691 participants (ages 21-80) to the two arms. The primary outcome is the increment of cavitated lesions. DISCUSSION: This trial should help resolve the overall issue of the effectiveness of xylitol in preventing caries by contributing evidence with a low risk of bias. Just as importantly, the trial will provide much-needed information about the effectiveness of a promising caries prevention agent in adults. An effective xylitol-based caries prevention intervention would represent an easily disseminated method to extend caries prevention to individuals not receiving caries preventive treatment in the dental office. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00393055.

Root caries risk indicators: a systematic review of risk models.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk indicators that are associated with root caries incidence in published predictive risk models. METHODS: Abstracts (n = 472) identified from a MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane registry search were screened independently by two investigators to exclude articles not in English (n = 39), published prior to 1970 (none), or containing no information on either root caries incidence, risk indicators, or risk models (n = 209). A full-article duplicate review of the remaining articles (n = 224) selected those reporting predictive risk models based on original/primary longitudinal root caries incidence studies. The quality of the included articles was assessed based both on selected criteria of methodological standards for observational studies and on the statistical quality of the modeling strategy. Data from these included studies were extracted and compiled into evidence tables, with information about the cohort location, incidence period, sample size, age of the study participants, risk indicators included in the model, root caries incidence, modeling strategy, significant risk indicators/predictors, and parameter estimates and statistical findings. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were selected for data extraction. The overall quality of the included articles was poor to moderate. Root caries incidence ranged from 12% to 77% (mean ± SD = 45 ± 17%); follow-up time of the published studies was ≤ 10 years (range = 9; median = 3); sample size ranged from 23-723 (mean ± SD = 264 ± 203; median = 261); person-years ranged from 23 to 1540 (mean ± SD = 760 ± 556; median = 746). Variables most frequently tested and significantly associated with root caries incidence were (times tested; % significant; directionality): baseline root caries (12; 58%; positive); number of teeth (7; 71%; three times positive, twice negative), and plaque index (4; 100%; positive). Ninety-two other clinical and nonclinical variables were tested: 27 were tested three times or more and were significant between 9% and 100% of the times tested; and 65 were tested but never significant. CONCLUSIONS: The root caries incidence indicators/predictors most frequently reported were root caries prevalence at baseline, number of teeth, and plaque index. This finding can guide targeted root caries prevention. There was substantial variation among published models of root caries risk in terms of variable selection, sample size, cohort location, assessment methods, incidence periods, association directionality, and analytical techniques. Future studies should emphasize variables frequently tested and often significant, and validate existing models in independent databases.

Four "lessons learned" while implementing a multi-site caries prevention trial.

As the number of dental-related randomized clinical trials (RCTs) increases, there is a need for literature to help investigators inexperienced in conducting RCTs design and implement studies. This commentary describes four "lessons learned" or considerations important in the planning and initial implementation of RCTs in dentistry that, to our knowledge, have not been discussed in the general dental literature describing trial techniques. These considerations are a) preparing or securing a thorough systematic review; b) developing a comprehensive set of study documents; c) designing and testing multiple recruitment strategies; and d) employing a run-in period prior to enrollment. Attention to these considerations in the planning phases of a dental RCT can help ensure that the trial is clinically relevant while also maximizing the likelihood that its implementation will be successful.

Correlation between laser fluorescence readings and volume of tooth preparation in incipient occlusal caries in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the correlation between laser fluorescence readings and the extent of incipient occlusal caries as measured by the volume of tooth preparation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three permanent molars and premolars containing incipient occlusal pit-and-fissure caries and sound occlusal surfaces (1/4 of the sample, control) were selected. DIAGNOdent (KaVo Dental Corporation, Lake Zurich, IL, USA) readings were obtained according to manufacturer instructions. Caries was removed with 1/4 round burs in high speed. The volume of tooth preparation was measured using a surrogate measure based on the amount of composite needed to fill the preparations. Sensitivity and specificity using different cutoff values were calculated for lesions/preparations extending into dentin. The results were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation for preparation volume and DIAGNOdent reading measurements was low (r = 0.285). Sensitivity and specificity of DIAGNOdent for detection of dentinal lesions were 0.83 and 0.60, and 0.66 and 0.73 for the cutoff values of 20 and 30, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, laser fluorescence measured with DIAGNOdent does not correlate well with extent of carious tooth structure in incipient occlusal caries. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should not rely only on DIAGNOdent readings to determine the extension of incipient occlusal caries.

Impact of symptomatic pericoronitis on health-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of symptomatic pericoronitis on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with symptomatic pericoronitis were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study. Each was given a third molar condition-specific HRQOL instrument to assess the impact of pericoronitis in the preceding week. Lifestyle and oral-function outcomes were assessed using a 5-point Likert-type scale, with anchors of "no trouble" (1) and "lots of trouble" (5). Pain outcomes were assessed using a 7-point scale anchored by "no pain" (1) and "worst pain imaginable" (7). Verbal descriptors for sensory perception and unpleasantness of pain were recorded on Gracely scales. The impact of symptomatic pericoronitis on overall health and well-being in the previous 3 months was recorded using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). RESULTS: The median age of 57 subjects was 23.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 21.2 to 25.8 years). Forty-nine percent were female, 56% were Caucasian, 21% were Asian, and 16% were African American. Ninety-one percent had at least some college experience. Twenty-eight percent of subjects described their worst pain in the week before enrollment as severe (5-7/7), 40% as moderate (3-4/7), and 32% as none/little (1-2/7). Average pain in the previous week was described as severe (5-7/7) for 4% of subjects, as moderate (3-4/7) for 40%, and as none/little (1-2/7) for 56%. On the Gracely scales, 9% of subjects reported the sensory intensity of pain in the past week as "intense," "very intense," or "extremely intense." Subjects reported "quite a bit/lots" of difficulty (4-5/5) with oral function (23% with eating, 19% with chewing, and 6% with opening) and "quite a bit/lots" of difficulty (4-5/5) with lifestyle (sleeping, social life, and sports/hobby, all at 2%). The median OHIP-14 Severity score was 11/56 (IQR, 5-17). The most frequently reported OHIP-14 items in the 3 months before enrollment were in the pain dimensions. The median Severity score for pain items was 4/8 (IQR, 2-6). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic pericoronitis can have adverse outcomes, compromising the quality of life and inflicting pain.

Provisional crown failures in dental school predoctoral clinics.

Following a preliminary study indicating that at least 10 percent of single-unit crown temporary restorations failed in patients who received treatment by predoctoral students, a comprehensive examination of provisional crown failure was initiated to identify strategies to reduce the failure rate. For all provisionalized, natural tooth, single-unit crown preparations in University of North Carolina School of Dentistry predoctoral clinics for one year (N=1008), we noted tooth type, type of crown, student level, faculty coverage experience, treatment clinic, temporary material and luting agent, and retreatment (failure) of the provisional restoration. For failures, we also noted the stage of crown preparation at failure and the time since initial placement of the temporary. We analyzed these data using simple cross-tabs and logistic regression on need for retreatment (alpha =0.05). The failure rate was 18.75 percent (N=189). The median time to failure was twelve days; the 25(th) and 75(th) percentiles were six and twenty-six days. Significant risk factors, in order of odds ratio estimates, were molar tooth, second- or third-year student, and inexperienced faculty. Most provisional failures occurred during the final preparation phase of treatment. Provisional restoration failure is more frequent than was initially suspected from preliminary studies. Strategies for institutional intervention to reduce provisional restoration failure include greater attention to evaluating provisional crowns placed by inexperienced students (sophomores and juniors) and placing more emphasis on the retentiveness of provisional restorations reused following the final impression. Review of provisional evaluation procedures is also indicated for faculty who do not routinely supervise these procedures.

Third molar root development and recovery from third molar surgery.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine if the completeness of the root formation of mandibular third molars prior to removal affected clinical and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from HRQOL responses from patients and clinical outcome data were available after third molar surgery conducted by surgeons in community practice and academic centers. The root development of each mandibular third molar on presurgery panoramic radiographs for these patients was assessed by trained clinician observers. Patients were categorized as those with complete root formation (both mandibular third molars had 100% completely formed roots) or as those with incomplete root formation (at least 1 mandibular third molar not completely formed). The proportion of patients who experienced delayed clinical or HRQOL recovery that exceeded a clinically relevant criterion value were compared for these 2 groups of patients using chi2 statistics. Level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Both mandibular third molars had 100% completely formed roots in 118 patients; at least 1 mandibular third molar was not completely formed in 218 patients. If patients had a mandibular third molar with roots less than 100% complete, they more likely: were female (65% vs 58%), were less than 25 years old (95% vs 54%), P < .01, and had not finished high school (59% vs 28%), P < .01. For those with incomplete root formation, bone removal for both mandibular third molars was more likely (84% vs 67%), P < .01, and the surgeons' overall estimate of degree of difficulty was greater (14/28 vs 12/28), P = .02. Median surgery time did not differ between groups. The proportion of patients who experienced delayed clinical or HRQOL recovery did not differ between the incomplete and complete root formation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete lower third molar root formation presurgery may not be a predictor of better or worse clinical or HRQOL recovery after surgery. Other clinical, demographic, and health indicators should influence surgeons' recommendations and patients' decisions regarding third molar treatment including surgery.