Retrospective Evaluation of the Association of Oxacillin MIC on Acute Treatment Outcomes with Cefazolin and Antistaphylococcal Penicillins in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASP) and cefazolin are first-line treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Borderline oxacillin resistance (i.e., oxacillin MICs 1-8 µg/mL) is observed in strains hyperproducing beta-lactamases. This mechanism is also behind the proposed inoculum effect. Minimal data exists on the comparative efficacy of cefazolin or ASP in qualitatively susceptible strains that demonstrate MICs of oxacillin of 1 to 2 µg/mL compared to strains with MIC of oxacillin < 1 µg/mL. We performed a retrospective cohort study of acute treatment outcomes in adult patients with community-acquired MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin or ASP, stratified by oxacillin MIC. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality during the index inpatient admission, failure to clear blood cultures within 72 h after initiating definitive therapy, and change in therapy due to perceived lack of efficacy. A total of 402 patients were included in this study, including 226 isolates with an oxacillin MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL and 176 isolates with an MIC < 1 µg/mL. There were no differences in the rate of the primary outcome occurrence between patients with an oxacillin MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL and an MIC < 1 µg/mL (16.4% versus 15.9%, P = 0.90). There was no difference in the primary outcome between high versus low oxacillin MIC groups among those who received ASP (22.9% versus 24.1%, P = 0.86) or cefazolin (10.3% versus 11.9%, P = 0.86). In our cohort of patients with MSSA bacteremia, oxacillin MIC (i.e., ≥ 1 versus < 1 µg/mL) was not associated with acute treatment outcomes, regardless of the beta-lactam selected as definitive therapy.

Pharmacotherapy Approaches in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) comprise a heterogeneous group of organisms, with only a small subset known to cause disease in humans. Although NTM infection is not a reportable disease, both the increasing clinical recognition and recent advancements in laboratory diagnostic capabilities of NTM infections in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients are rapidly evolving. We reviewed antimicrobial agents used to treat the most frequently encountered NTM infections and examined optimized drug dosing strategies, toxicity profiles, drug-drug interactions, and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and patient monitoring on therapy were also examined. We used PubMed to review the published literature on the management of select NTM pathogens, the common syndromes encountered since 2000, and select pharmacokinetic principles of select antimicrobial agents used since 1990. We included select clinical trials, systematic reviews, published guidelines, and observational studies when applicable. The prolonged duration and the necessity for combination therapy for most forms of NTM disease can be problematic for many patients. A multidisciplinary care team that includes pharmacy engagement may help increase rates of optimal patient tolerability and successful treatment completion.

Assessment of the presence and quality of osteoporosis prevention education among at-risk internal medicine patients.

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate calcium and vitamin D intake for the prevention of osteoporosis represents an important component of osteoporosis prevention education (OPE). We sought to assess the presence and quality of OPE among osteoporotic and at-risk inpatients. DESIGN: Prospective chart review plus cross-sectional interview. SETTING: One academic tertiary referral medical center in Rochester, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted to an inpatient medicine service who were determined to be at risk for osteoporosis based on an investigator-developed screening tool or previously diagnosed with osteoporosis. Four hundred sixtyfour patients were screened, 192 patients were approached for participation, and 150 patients consented to be interviewed for the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Source of OPE, rates of appropriate calcium intake and supplementation. RESULTS: OPE from a health care provider was reported by 31.3% of patients, with only one patient reporting education from a pharmacist. Self OPE and no OPE were received by 29.3% and 39.3% of patients, respectively. Appropriate overall calcium intake was found in 30.7% of patients, and only 21.3% of patients were taking an appropriate calcium salt. CONCLUSION: Patients with osteoporosis and risk factors for osteoporosis lack adequate education from health care providers regarding appropriate intake of dietary and supplemental calcium and vitamin D. A particular deficit was noted in pharmacist-provided education. Specific education targeting elemental calcium amounts, salt selection, and vitamin D intake should be provided to increase the presence of appropriate overall calcium consumption.