RESUMO
Anti-arrhythmics can be useful for ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) that are refractory to immunosuppression. However, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of immunosuppression for treating arrhythmias in CS patients and a lack of data to support using immunosuppression alone as an initial strategy. The objective of this study was to assess for differences in arrhythmia burden over time with currently used immunosuppression and anti-arrhythmic regimens. Patients with CS and implanted cardiac devices were identified from a single-center registry. Study participants were retrospectively classified based on the medication regimen as follows: control (no therapy), immunosuppression, anti-arrhythmics, or dual therapy. Device interrogations were reviewed for premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), and device firings over time. Interrogations for 42 patients were reviewed over a mean period of 31 months. Regression analysis showed a significant decrease in the frequencies of PVCs (slope, -1.47; P = .04) and NSVT (slope, -0.05; P = .01) for patients on dual therapy compared to an increase or no change in the other groups. Across all patients, there was no difference between groups in the percentage of patients experiencing device firings. In a subset analysis of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention, 6% on dual therapy required device firings compared to 43% and 40% on single or no therapy, respectively (P = .049, χ2 = 6.02). In conclusion, patients on both immunosuppression and anti-arrhythmics had a reduction in PVCs and NSVT over time. Overall, there were no differences between groups in terms of device firings, except in a subset analysis of patients with no history of ventricular tachycardia.
RESUMO
Background: A 25-base pair (25bp) intronic deletion in the MYBPC3 gene enriched in South Asians (SAs) is a risk allele for late-onset left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, hypertrophy, and heart failure (HF) with several forms of cardiomyopathy. However, the effect of this variant on exercise parameters has not been evaluated. Methods: As a pilot study, 10 asymptomatic SA carriers of the MYBPC3 Δ25bp variant (52.9 ± 2.14 years) and 10 age- and gender-matched non-carriers (NCs) (50.1 ± 2.7 years) were evaluated at baseline and under exercise stress conditions using bicycle exercise echocardiography and continuous cardiac monitoring. Results: Baseline echocardiography parameters were not different between the two groups. However, in response to exercise stress, the carriers of Δ25bp had significantly higher LV ejection fraction (%) (CI: 4.57 ± 1.93; p < 0.0001), LV outflow tract peak velocity (m/s) (CI: 0.19 ± 0.07; p < 0.0001), and higher aortic valve (AV) peak velocity (m/s) (CI: 0.103 ± 0.08; p = 0.01) in comparison to NCs, and E/A ratio, a marker of diastolic compliance, was significantly lower in Δ25bp carriers (CI: 0.107 ± 0.102; p = 0.038). Interestingly, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVIDdia) was augmented in NCs in response to stress, while it did not increase in Δ25bp carriers (CI: 0.239 ± 0.125; p = 0.0002). Further, stress-induced right ventricular systolic excursion velocity s' (m/s), as a marker of right ventricle function, increased similarly in both groups, but tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion increased more in carriers (slope: 0.008; p = 0.0001), suggesting right ventricle functional differences between the two groups. Conclusions: These data support that MYBPC3 Δ25bp is associated with LV hypercontraction under stress conditions with evidence of diastolic impairment.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We assessed multiple examinations and assessment tools to develop a standardized measurement of alcohol intoxication to aid medical decision making in the Emergency Department. METHODS: Volunteers underwent an alcohol challenge. Pre- and post-alcohol challenge, subjects were videotaped performing three standardized clinical examinations: (1) Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) examination, (2) Hack's Impairment Index (HII) examination, and (3) Cincinnati Intoxication Examination (CIE). Emergency clinicians evaluated the level of intoxication using five standardized assessment tools in a blinded and randomized fashion: (1) SFST assessment tool (range 0-18), (2) HII assessment tool (range 0-1), (3) St. Elizabeth Alcohol Intoxication Scale (STE, range 0-17), (4) a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 0-100), and (5) a Binary Intoxication Question (BIQ). Construct validity was assessed along with inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: Median scores pre- and post-alcohol challenge were: SFST 6 (interquartile range 5) and 11 (3), respectively; HII 0 (0.05), 0.1 (0.1); STE 0 (1), 1 (2); VAS 10 (22), 33 (31). For BIQ, 59% and 91% indicated intoxication, respectively. Inter-rater reliability scores were: SFST 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.48-0.86) to 0.93 (0.88-0.97) depending on examination component; HII 0.90 (0.82-0.95); STE 0.86 (0.75-0.93); VAS 0.92 (0.88-0.94); BIQ 0.3. Intra-rater reliability scores were: SFST 0.74 (0.64-0.82) to 0.87 (0.81-0.91); HII 0.85 (0.79-0.90); STE 0.78 (0.68-0.85); VAS 0.82 (0.74-0.87); BIQ 0.71. VAS reliability was best when paired with the HII and SFST examinations. CONCLUSIONS: HII examination, paired with either a VAS or HII assessment tool, yielded valid and reliable measurements of alcohol intoxication.