The risk of clinical misinterpretation of HbA1c: Modelling the impact of biological variation and analytical performance on HbA1c used for diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The validity of clinical interpretation of HbA1c depends on the analytical performance of the method and the biological variation of HbA1c in patients. The contribution of non-glucose related factors to the biological variation of HbA1c (NGBVA1c) is not known. This paper explores the cumulative impact of analytical errors and NGBVA1c on the risk of misinterpretation. METHODS: A model has been developed to predict the risk of misinterpretation of HbA1c for diagnosis and monitoring with variables for analytical performance and levels of NGBVA1c. RESULTS: The model results in probabilities of misinterpretation for a given HbA1c. EXAMPLE: for an HbA1c 43 mmol/mol (6.1%), bias 1 mmol/mol (0.09%), CV 3% (2%) used for diagnosis, the probabilities of misinterpretation range from 1 to 19% depending on the contribution of NGBVA1c to the biological variation of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to analytical bias and imprecision, NGBVA1c contributes to the risk of misinterpretation, but the relative impact is different per clinical application of HbA1c. For monitoring, imprecision is the predominating factor, for diagnosis both biological variation and analytical bias. Given the increasing use of HbA1c for diagnosis, increase of knowledge on NGBVA1c, decrease of analytical bias, and awareness of the risk of misinterpretation are required.

Evaluation of the ARKRAY HA-8190V instrument for HbA1c.

OBJECTIVES: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a valuable parameter in the monitoring of diabetic patients and increasingly in diagnosis of diabetes. Manufacturers continuously optimize instruments, currently the main focus is to achieve faster turnaround times. It is important that performance specifications remain of high enough standard, which is evaluated in this study for the new ARKRAY HA-8190V instrument. METHODS: The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocols EP-5, EP-9 and EP-10 were applied to investigate imprecision, bias and linearity. In addition potential interferences, performance in External Quality Assessment (EQA) and performance against the HA-8180V instrument in 220 clinical samples was evaluated. RESULTS: The HA-8190V demonstrates a CV of ≤0.8% in IFCC SI units (≤0.6% National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program [NGSP]) at 34 and 102 mmol/mol levels (5.3 and 11.5% NGSP) and a bias of -0.1 mmol/mol (-0.01% NGSP) at a concentration of 50 mmol/mol (6.7% NGSP), but with a significant slope as compared to target values. This results in a bias of -1.0 and 0.9 mmol/mol (-2.0 and 0.9% NGSP) at the 30 and 70 mmol/mol (4.9 and 8.6% NGSP) concentration level. Simulation of participation in the IFCC certification programme results in a Silver score (bias -0.1 mmol/mol, CV 1.1%). Interference in the presence of the most important Hb variants (AS, AC, AE, AD) and elevated HbA2 and HbF concentrations is less than 3 mmol/mol (0.3% NGSP) at a concentration of 50 mmol/mol (6.7% NGSP). CONCLUSIONS: Analytical performance of the HA-8190V is very good, especially with respect to precision and HbA1c quantification in the presence of the most common Hb variants.

External quality assessment schemes for inorganic elements in the clinical laboratory: Lessons from the OELM scheme.

Measurements of inorganic elements in clinical laboratories produce results used for the diagnosis, the treatment and the monitoring of deficiencies or overloads. The main objective of External Quality Assessment Schemes is to verify, on a regular frequency, that clinical laboratory results correspond to the quality requirement for patient care. Therefore, External Quality Assessment Schemes represent an essential component of a laboratory's quality management system. However, External Quality Assessment Schemes within the same analytical field remain heterogeneous for different reasons such as samples, determination of assigned value, acceptable limits, content of the reports. The aim of this review was to describe and illustrate some major critical aspects of External Quality Assessment Schemes based on Occupational and Environmental Laboratory Medicine external quality assessment scheme experience.

The global impact of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Education and Management Division: engaging stakeholders and assessing HbA1c quality in a multicentre study across China.

Background Diabetes mellitus is a major global issue and high quality testing is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The IFCC Committee for the Education in the Utility of Biomarkers in Diabetes (C-EUBD) plays a global role in improving knowledge and understanding around diabetes testing. This paper describes a multi-stakeholder approach, to improving diagnostic and therapeutic testing for diabetes, using a multicentre study in China as an example of the global impact of the group. Methods Educational workshops were developed to support the scientific aims of the study in which 30 centres around China received identical, fresh frozen whole blood samples with values assigned using IFCC secondary reference methods and undertook precision (EP-5) and trueness studies. Performance was assessed using sigma metrics. Results A successful multi-stakeholder group was developed and sustained throughout the study through several educational workshops, which enabled the formation of a long-term collaboration with key opinion leaders and policy makers in China. All 30 centres showed good performance with within and between laboratory coefficient of variations (CVs) below 3% in SI units at both low and high haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. All individual laboratories met the criteria of a sigma of two or more at a total allowable error (TAE) of 5 mmol/mol (0.46% NGSP). Conclusions The study led to a successful multi-partner approach to improving diabetes testing in China. All centres involved in the study meeting the published IFCC quality criteria, paving the way for future clinical trials and an expanded role for HbA1c testing across the country.

Evaluation of Performance of Laboratories and Manufacturers Within the Framework of the IFCC model for Quality Targets of HbA1c.

HbA1c is a key parameter in diabetes management. For years the test has been used exclusively for monitoring of long-term diabetic control. However, due to improvement of the performance, HbA1c is considered more and more for diagnosis and screening. With this new application, quality demands further increase. A task force of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine developed a model to set and evaluate quality targets for HbA1c. The model is based on the concept of total error and takes into account the major sources of analytical errors in the medical laboratory: bias and imprecision. Performance criteria are derived from sigma-metrics and biological variation. This review shows 2 examples of the application of the model: at the level of single laboratories, and at the level of a group of laboratories. In the first example data of 125 individual laboratories of a recent external quality assessment program in the Netherlands are evaluated. Differences between laboratories as well as their relation to method principles are shown. The second example uses recent and 3-year-old data of the proficiency test of the College of American Pathologists. The differences in performance between 26 manufacturer-related groups of laboratories are shown. Over time these differences are quite consistent although some manufacturers improved substantially either by better standardization or by replacing a test. The IFCC model serves all who are involved in HbA1c testing in the ongoing process of better performance and better patient care.

HbA1c: EQA in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands using fresh whole blood samples with target values assigned with the IFCC reference system.

BACKGROUND: External quality assessment/proficiency test (EQA/PT) organizers play an important role in monitoring the performance of HbA1c measurements. With increasing quality of the assays, HbA1c is increasingly used for diagnosis of diabetes and the demands on EQA/PT organizers themselves are rising constantly. EQA organizers in Germany (INSTAND), Belgium (WIV/IPV), and the Netherlands (SKML) organized a program with commutable samples and target values assigned with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference system. The aim of this project was to confirm the logistic feasibility of organizing synchronically in the three countries, an accuracy-based EQA program with fresh whole blood, to investigate the performance of HbA1c assays within and across countries and manufacturers, and to review the EQA acceptance limits. METHODS: Throughout 2015, ten fresh whole blood samples were supplied to the participants. Aggregated results were evaluated according to the IFCC model for quality targets at four levels: overall, per country, per manufacturer, and per country per manufacturer. RESULTS: Robust results in summer and winter demonstrated the feasibility of organizing an EQA with fresh whole blood samples in three countries. The overall performances, as well as the performance for each country were very similar: results fell within the IFCC criteria. Although substantial differences between results from different manufacturers were present, the performances of laboratories using tests of the same manufacturer were strikingly similar in the three countries, suggesting that the quality of HbA1c assays is for the most part manufacturer- related. The improved design of the EQA program also suggested that acceptance limits for performance can be reduced to approximately 8%.

Effects of hemoglobin C, D, E and S traits on measurements of hemoglobin A1c by twelve methods.

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin C, D Punjab, E or S trait can interfere with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results. We assessed whether they affect results obtained with 12 current assay methods. METHODS: Hemoglobin AA (HbAA), HbAC, HbAD Punjab, HbAE and HbAS samples were analyzed on one enzymatic, nine ion-exchange HPLC and two Capillary Electrophoresis methods. Trinity ultra(2) boronate affinity HPLC was the comparative method. An overall test of coincidence of least-squared linear regression lines was performed to determine if HbA1c results were statistically significantly different from those of HbAA samples. Clinically significant interference was defined as >7% difference from HbAA at 6 or 9% HbA1c compared to ultra(2) using Deming regression. RESULTS: All methods showed statistically significant effects for one or more variants. Clinically significant effects were observed for the Tosoh G8 variant mode and GX (all variants), GX V1.22 (all but HbAE) and G11 variant mode (HbAC). All other methods (Abbott Architect c Enzymatic, Bio-Rad D-100, Variant II NU and Variant II Turbo 2.0, Menarini HA-8180T thalassemia mode and HA-8180V variant mode, Sebia Capillarys 2 and Capillarys 3) showed no clinically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Several methods showed clinically significant interference with HbA1c results from one or more variants which could adversely affect patient care.

Multicentre evaluation of the Premier Hb9210 HbA1c analyser.

BACKGROUND: The accurate and precise quantification of HbA1c is essential for the diagnosis and routine monitoring of patients with diabetes. We report an evaluation of the Trinity Biotech Premier Hb9210 analyser (Bray, Ireland/Kansas City, MO, USA), a boronate affinity chromatography-based high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system for the measurement of glycated haemoglobin. METHODS: We evaluated the analytical performance of the Hb9210 as part of a multicentre evaluation. The effect of haemoglobin variants, other potential interferences and the performance in comparison to both the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) and National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) reference systems, was assessed. Most of the centres participating also act as reference laboratories for both the IFCC standardisation network for HbA1c and the NGSP. RESULTS: The combined data from all centres showed total coefficients of variation (CV) of 2.71%, 2.32% and 2.14% at low, medium and high values, respectively, for mmol/mol (SI units) and 1.62%, 1.59% and 1.68% for % (NGSP units), which are well below the recommended upper limits of 3% CV for mmol/mol (SI units) and 2% CV for % (NGSP). The analyser showed a good correlation to HbA1c methods currently used in clinical practice and the IFCC reference method procedure. Haemoglobin variants AC, AS, AE and AD do not affect the measurement of HbA1c. Overall the Hb9210 performs well across the whole analytical range. CONCLUSIONS: The Hb9210 performs well and is suitable for clinical application in the analysis of HbA1c.

Harmonization of measurement results of the alcohol biomarker carbohydrate-deficient transferrin by use of the toolbox of technical procedures of the International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results.

BACKGROUND: The need for equivalent results of routine measurement procedures for the alcohol biomarker carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) has been recognized by the IFCC. This article describes a project to harmonize CDT as conducted by an IFCC working group initiated for this purpose. METHODS: We used procedures for achieving harmonization as developed by the Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results to assess the suitability of a candidate reference measurement procedure (cRMP), candidate reference materials (cRMs), and the success of efforts to achieve harmonization. RESULTS: CDT measurement procedures in routine use showed good reproducibility (CV 1.1%-2.8%) and linearity (r > 0.990) with variable slopes (0.766-1.065) and intercepts (-0.34 to 0.92) compared to the cRMP. Heterogeneity after simulated harmonization was 4.7%. cRMs of frozen human native sera demonstrated commutability and 3-year stability for routine measurement procedures. The cRMP provided reproducible value assignment to cRMs with an expanded uncertainty (k = 2) of 0.03% at the 1.2% CDT level and 0.06% at the 4.4% CDT level. Harmonization efforts reduced the intermeasurement CV from 8.8% to 3.4%, allowed 99% recovery of the values assigned with the cRMP, and demonstrated 99% of results within the desirable allowable total error. Harmonization was less successful in samples with low CDT and high trisialotransferrin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization of CDT is possible with frozen human native sera as cRMs with values assigned by use of the cRMP. We propose the cRMP as a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure and cRMs as candidate international calibrators.

Toward standardization of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) measurements: III. Performance of native serum and serum spiked with disialotransferrin proves that harmonization of CDT assays is possible.

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a generic term that refers to the transferrin glycoforms whose concentration in blood is temporarily increased by sustained alcohol consumption. Due to high clinical specificity, CDT was proposed as a biomarker of heavy alcohol use and has been available for about 20 years. A number of methods have been developed for CDT measurement based on different analytical techniques and principles and without any harmonization or calibration to a reference method. As a consequence, neither the reference limits nor the cut-off values have been similar across assays, hampering understanding of the diagnostic value of CDT and its routine use. This prompted the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) to initiate a Working Group on Standardization of CDT (WG-CDT). This third publication of the WG-CDT is devoted to testing the commutability of native and disialotransferrin-spiked serum panels as candidate secondary reference materials, in order to prove the harmonization potential of commercial CDT methods. The results showed that assay harmonization reduced the inter-laboratory imprecision in a network of reference laboratories running the HPLC candidate reference method. In the seven commercial methods evaluated in this study, the use of multi-level secondary calibrators of human serum origin significantly reduced the between-method imprecision. Thus, harmonization of CDT measurements by different methods can be achieved using this calibration system, opening the way for a full standardization of commercial methods against a reference method by use of certified reference materials.

One in five laboratories using various hemoglobin A1c methods do not meet the criteria for optimal diabetes care management.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the reference change value (RCV) of currently available hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) laboratory assays, which is defined as the critical difference between two consecutive HbA(1c) measurements representing a significant change in health status. METHODS: We examined the individual laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) in the Dutch/Belgian quality scheme based on 24 lyophilized samples and calculated the RCV per laboratory (n = 220) and per assay method. In addition, two pooled whole blood samples were sent to the participating laboratories. The individual laboratory results were compared to the assigned value ± an allowable total error (TE(a)) of 6%. RESULTS: At HbA(1c) values of 41.0 mmol/mol (5.9%-Diabetes Control and Complications Trial [DCCT]) and 61.8 mmol/mol (7.8%-DCCT), 99% and 98%, respectively, of the laboratories reported a value within a TE(a) limit of 6%. The analytical CV of the HbA(1c) method used in 78% of the laboratories is <2.4%. The mean RCV at an HbA(1c) value of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%-DCCT) for methods of Bio-Rad is 5.9 mmol/mol (0.59%-DCCT); for Arkray/Menarini, 4.3 mmol/mol (0.43%-DCCT); for Roche, 6.5 mmol/mol (0.65%-DCCT); for Tosoh, 3.3 mmol/mol (0.33%-DCCT); and for other methods, 6.3 mmol/mol (0.63%-DCCT). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of the majority of laboratory HbA(1c) methods is within the clinical requirements. However, based on the calculated RCV, 21.8% of the laboratories using different HbA(1c) methods are not able to distinguish an HbA(1c) result of 59 mmol/mol (7.5%-DCCT) from a previous HbA(1c) result of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%-DCCT). It can be presumed that differences in HbA(1c) results of 5 mmol/mol (0.5%-DCCT) do influence treatment decisions.

Evaluation of the Menarini/ARKRAY ADAMS A1c HA-8180V analyser for HbA1c.

BACKGROUND: We report an evaluation of the Menarini/ARKRAY ADAMS A1c HA-8180V analyser (HA-8180V), the fifth generation Menarini/ARKRAY ion-exchange HPLC for the measurement of HbA(1c). METHODS: We evaluated the analytical performance, the measurement of haemoglobin variants and the performance in comparison to major analytical methods. RESULTS: Within-run, between-run and total CV were 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.7% at low HbA(1c) concentrations and 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% at high HbA(1c) concentrations, respectively. Trueness revealed a maximum deviation of 0.8 mmol/mol (IFCC units) or 0.1% (NGSP units) over the relevant analytical range. Linearity, carry-over and linear drift were excellent. Labile-HbA(1c), carbamylated haemoglobin, icteric samples and variation in hematocrit did not affect HbA(1c) outcome. Haemoglobin variants AS, AC and F do not affect HbA(1c) outcome and are explicitly identified and correctly quantified. HbA(1c) can not be measured in samples with AE and AD, but these variants are identified correctly. In comparison to other methods used at present, the HA-8180V shows excellent performance. CONCLUSIONS: The HA-8180V performs at a high level and is fit for any clinical application.

Toward standardization of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) measurements: II. Performance of a laboratory network running the HPLC candidate reference measurement procedure and evaluation of a candidate reference material.

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a descriptive term used for a temporary change in the transferrin glycosylation profile caused by alcohol, and used as a biomarker of chronic high alcohol consumption. The use of an array of methods for measurement of CDT in various absolute or relative amounts, and sometimes covering different transferrin glycoforms, has complicated the comparability of results and caused confusion among medical staff. This situation prompted initiation of an IFCC Working Group on CDT standardization. This second publication of the WG-CDT covers the establishment of a network of reference laboratories running a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) candidate reference measurement procedure, and evaluation of candidate secondary reference materials. The network laboratories demonstrated good and reproducible performance and thus can be used to assign target values for calibrators and controls. A candidate secondary reference material based on native human serum lyophilized with a cryo-/lyoprotectant to prevent protein denaturation was found to be commutable and stable during storage. A proposed strategy for calibration of different CDT methods is also presented. In an external quality assurance study involving 66 laboratories and covering the current routine CDT assays (HPLC, capillary electrophoresis and immunoassay), recalculation of observed results based on the nominal values for the candidate calibrator reduced the overall coefficient of variation from 18.9% to 5.5%. The logistics for distribution of reference materials and review of results were found to be functional, indicating that a full reference system for CDT may soon be available.

Statistical methods for monitoring the relationship between the IFCC reference measurement procedure for hemoglobin A1c and the designated comparison methods in the United States, Japan, and Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)/International Diabetes Federation (IDF)/IFCC Consensus Statement on the worldwide standardization of HbA(1c) states that "... [HbA(1c)] results are to be reported world-wide in IFCC units ... and derived NGSP units ... , using the IFCC-NGSP master equation." METHODS: We describe statistical methods to evaluate and monitor the relationships as expressed in master equations (MEs) between the IFCC Reference Measurement procedure (IFCC-RM) and designated comparison methods (DCMs) [US National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), Japanese Diabetes Society/Japanese Society for Clinical Chemistry (JDS/JSCC), and Mono-S in Sweden]. We applied these statistics, including uncertainty calculations, to 12 studies in which networks of reference laboratories participated, operating the IFCC-RM and DCMs. RESULTS: For NGSP and Mono-S, slope, intercept, and derived percentage HbA(1c) at the therapeutic target show compliance with the respective MEs in all 12 studies. For JDS/JSCC, a slight deviation is seen in slope and derived percentage HbA(1c) in 2 of the 12 studies. Using the MEs, the uncertainty in an assigned value increases from 0.42 mmol/mol HbA(1c) (IFCC-RM) to 0.47 (NGSP), 0.49 (JDS/JSCC), and 0.51 (Mono-S). CONCLUSIONS: We describe sound statistical methods for the investigation of relations between networks of reference laboratories. Application of these statistical methods to the relationship between the IFCC-RM and DCMs in the US, Japan, and Sweden shows that they are suitable for the purpose, and the results support the applicability of the ADA/EASD/IDF/IFCC Consensus Statement on HbA1c measurement.

The IFCC Reference Measurement System for HbA1c: a 6-year progress report.

BACKGROUND: The IFCC Reference Measurement System for hemoglobin (Hb)A(1c) (IFCC-RM) has been developed within the framework of metrologic traceability and is embedded in a network of 14 reference laboratories. This paper describes the outcome of 12 intercomparison studies (periodic evaluations to control essential elements of the IFCC-RM). METHODS: Each study included: unknown samples (to test individual network laboratories); known samples (controls); recently manufactured calibrators (to check calculated assigned value); stored calibrators (to test stability) and a calibration-set (to calibrate the IFCC-RM). The unknown samples are measured by use of the IFCC-RM and the designated comparison methods [DCMs; the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) in the US, Japanese Diabetes Society/Japanese Society for Clinical Chemistry (JDS/JSCC) in Japan, and Mono-S in Sweden] are used to investigate the stability of the Master Equation (ME), the relationship between IFCC-RM and DCMs. RESULTS: A total of 105 IFCC-RM data sets were evaluated: 95 were approved, 5 were not, and for 5 no data were submitted. Trend analysis of the MEs, expressed as change in percentage HbA(1c) per year, revealed 0.000% (NGSP, not significant), -0.030%, (JDS/JSCC; significant) and -0.016% (Mono-S; not significant). Evaluation of long-term performance revealed no systematic change over time; 2 laboratories showed significant bias, 1 poor reproducibility. The mean HbA(1c) determined by laboratories performing mass spectrometry (MS) was the same as the mean determined by laboratories using capillary electrophoresis (CE), but the reproducibility at laboratories using CE was better. One batch of new calibrators was not approved. All stored calibrators were stable. CONCLUSION: A sound reference system is in place to ensure continuity and stability of the analytical anchor for HbA(1c).