The Sinus Tract in Bone and Joint Infection: Minimally Invasive Salvation or Prolonged Suffering? A Multicenter Study.

This study assessed the quality of life (QOL) and the functional outcome in daily living in patients with a chronic, treatment-resistant periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or osteomyelitis, living with a natural or iatrogenic sinus tract. METHODS: A follow-up examination in three national reference centers for septic bone and joint surgery was performed utilizing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D/A), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, including patients with a chronic sinus tract due to treatment-resistant PJI or osteomyelitis. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients were included, with a mean follow-up time of 43.1 ± 23.9 months. The mean SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 50.2 (±12.3) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) was 33.9 (±11.3). The mean HADS-D was 6.6 (±4.4) and HADS-A was 6.2 (±4.6), and the VAS was 3.4 (±2.6). The SF-36 MCS showed no significant differences between the study group and the standard population (47.0, p = 0.10), as well as the HADS-A. The PCS in the study population was significantly worse (50.0, p < 0.001), as was the HADS-D. CONCLUSIONS: A sinus tract represents a treatment option in selected cases with an acceptable QOL. The treatment should be considered for multimorbid patients with a high perioperative risk or if the bone or soft tissue quality prevents surgery.

Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections.

PURPOSE: Besides other diagnostic test methods, established serum inflammatory markers such as serum C-reactive protein or leukocyte count are widely used preoperatively to aid in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Although low accuracies were reported, these parameters are easily accessible and routinely available. Novel biomarkers with promising results in diagnosing PJI (platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio) or other infectious conditions (percentage of neutrophils, neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio) were described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of established and novel serum inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI so as to compare the results to find the serum inflammatory marker with the best performance. METHODS: In 177 patients with a previous total hip (n = 91) or knee (n = 86) arthroplasty and indicated revision surgery, the diagnostic value of the routinely available serum inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (%N), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were examined retrospectively via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test. RESULTS: Sensitivities of serum CRP, WBC, %N, NLR, fibrinogen and PC/mPV were calculated with 68%, 36%, 66%, 63%, 69% and 43%, respectively. Specificities were 87%, 89%, 67%, 73%, 89% and 81%, respectively. Serum CRP (0.78) and fibrinogen (0.79) showed significantly better AUCs compared with serum WBC (0.63), %N (0.67), NLR (0.68) and PC/mPV (0.62) (p < 0.0001). Patients with PJI caused by a low-virulent microorganism (median CRP: 17.6 mg/L) obtained lower CRP levels compared with infections caused by high-virulent microorganisms (median CRP: 49.2 mg/L; p = 0.044). The combination of CRP and fibrinogen showed a better sensitivity (77%) with similar specificity (83%) than one method alone but not at a significant level (CRP (p = 0.200); fibrinogen (p = 0.437)). CONCLUSION: Serum CRP and fibrinogen showed the best accuracies among these widely available serum inflammatory parameters. However, due to the insufficient performance, these biomarkers can only be recommended as suggestive criteria in diagnosing PJI. The preoperative workup should always be complemented by more specific tests such as synovial fluid analysis.

High Revision Rates of a Cementless Beta-Titanium Alloy Stem with Contamination-Free Roughened Surface in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Optimal osseointegration of cementless total hip arthroplasty is essential for high stability and long-term survival. The purpose of this follow-up study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome, the complications, and survival rates of a beta-titanium alloy stem with a specific grit-blasted-free surface. In 192 patients (mean age of 64.4 years), 202 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties were performed using a cementless Hipstar® stem (Stryker, Duisburg, DE). The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively. Radiolucent lines were evaluated and the implant survival rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.71 years (range of 5.0-14.0 years). Overall, 15 revisions were performed. Early aseptic stem loosening was observed in six cases (2.97%). Radiolucent-lines adjacent to the stem were detected in 73 cases (83.02%), especially (70.46%) in the Gruen zones 1, 7, 8, and 14. The mean postoperative HHS was 92.65 points (range 42-100). The cumulative survival probability of the stem was 94.4% (95% CI 90.3 to 98.5%). Considering aseptic failure as an endpoint, the cumulative survival rate of the stem was 95.3% (95% CI 0.914 to 0.992) at six years of follow-up. Overall, an inferior mid-term implant survival was observed in comparison to well-established cementless stem designs.

Value of multiplex PCR for detection of antimicrobial resistance in samples retrieved from patients with orthopaedic infections.

BACKGROUND: The performance of multiplex PCR (mPCR) for detection of antimicrobial resistance from clinical isolates is unknown. We assessed the ability of mPCR to analyse resistance genes directly from clinical samples. Patients with orthopedic infections were prospectively included. Phenotypical and genotypical resistance was evaluated in clinical samples (synovial and sonication fluid) where identical pathogens were identified by culture and mPCR. RESULT: A total of 94 samples were analysed, including 60 sonication fluid and 34 synovial fluid samples. For coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains, mPCR detected resistance to oxacillin in 10 of 23 isolates (44%) and to rifampin in none of 6 isolates. For S. aureus isolates, detection rate of oxacillin and rifampin-resistance was 100% (2/2 and 1/1, respectively). Fluoroquinolone-resistance was confirmed by mPCR in all 3 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, in enterococci resistance to aminoglycoside-high level was detected in 1 of 3 isolates (33%) and in streptococci resistance to macrolides/lincosamides in none of 2 isolates. The overall sensitivity for different pathogens and antimicrobials was 46% and specificity 95%, the median concordance was 80% (range, 57-100%). Full agreement was observed for oxacillin in S. aureus, vancomycin in enterococci, carbapenems/cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae and rifampin in Cutibacterium species. CONCLUSION: The overall sensitivity for detection of antimicrobial resistance by mPCR directly from clinical samples was low. False-negative mPCR results occurred mainly in coagulase-negative staphylococci, especially for oxacillin and rifampin. However, the specificity of mPCR was high and a positive result reliably predicted antimicrobial resistance. Including universal primers in the PCR test assay may improve the detection rate but requires additional sequencing step. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT02530229, registered at 21 August 2015 (retrospectively registered).

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Calcaneal Osteomyelitis in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Calcaneal osteomyelitis is an uncommon and challenging condition. In this systematic review we aim to analyse the outcomes from concomitant use of bone debridement and soft tissue management for patients diagnosed with calcaneal osteomyelitis. Materials & Methods: A complete computerised and comprehensive literature search of Pubmed and Cochrane database was undertaken from January 2000 to October 2018. During the review, studies were screened for information about the surgical and antimicrobial treatment, the complications, the reinfection rate and the functional outcome of patients with calcaneal osteomyelitis. Results: Of the 20 eligible studies included, seven (35%) described bone treatment only, six (30%) soft tissue treatment only, five (25%) soft tissue and bone treatment, and two (10%) focused on prognostic factors and differences in outcomes between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. In the studies with bone treatment only, infection recurrence ranged from 0 to 35% and the amputation rate from 0 to 29%. If soft tissue coverage was also needed, both the reinfection rate and amputation rate ranged from 0 to 24%. Studies presenting the functional status generally showed preservation or even improvement of the preoperative ambulatory status. Conclusion: Calcaneal osteomyelitis is difficult to treat. A multidisciplinary approach involving orthopaedic surgeons, plastic surgeons and infectious disease physicians is preferred. The heterogenicity of studies has hindered the development of agreed treatment protocols, which would be useful in clinical practice.

Multiplex PCR Unyvero i60 ITI application improves detection of low-virulent microorganisms in periprosthetic joint infections.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pre-operative performance of an automated multiplex PCR (mPCR) system in patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: Under sterile conditions, synovial fluid samples from patients with a suspected PJI were collected pre-operatively. One hundred eighty microliter of the aspirate was used for analysis in the mPCR. The remaining joint fluid was sent for microbiological analysis. PJI was diagnosed by using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Total percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient were calculated to measure overall agreement. RESULTS: Overall, 90 patients with a suspected PJI were included. Using MSIS criteria, 38 (42%) patients were classified as septic. Total percent agreement between mPCR and synovial fluid culture was 86% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.68. The mPCR and synovial fluid culture showed sensitivities of 71% and 84%, respectively. Combined evaluation provided an even higher sensitivity of 92%. While Cutibacterium spp. were detected five times by mPCR, it could only be cultured once. A higher detection rate of CoNS by mPCR (n = 7) compared to conventional culture (n = 5) was also demonstrated. In comparison to synovial fluid culture, the mPCR missed Staphylococcus aureus five times. CONCLUSION: With a moderate agreement between synovial fluid mPCR and culture, the mPCR system could be a useful adjunct in diagnosing a PJI pre-operatively. Due to faster availability of results and a higher detection rate of low-virulent microorganisms, it can complement conventional culture.

Is the Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay More Accurate Than the Lateral Flow Alpha Defensin Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND: Alpha defensin was proposed as a new biomarker in synovial fluid for the diagnostic workup of failed joint prostheses. To our knowledge, no comparative study of the performance of the quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and qualitative lateral flow alpha defensin test has been reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Using the proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria for defining periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ELISA and qualitative lateral flow alpha defensin tests? (2) Is there a difference in the performance of the two alpha defensin tests when using three definition classification systems (Musculoskeletal Infection Society [MSIS], Infectious Diseases Society of America [IDSA], and proposed EBJIS)? METHODS: In this retrospective study of samples collected earlier as part of a related longitudinal study, we included patients in whom aspiration of the prosthetic hip or knee was performed as routine investigation before every revision arthroplasty. Between October 2016 and April 2017, a total of 73 patients were eligible for inclusion. As a result of an insufficient fluid volume for analysis (< 5 mL), two patients were excluded. Among the 71 patients in the final analysis, 54 had a knee and 17 a hip arthroplasty. Using the proposed EBJIS criteria, PJI was diagnosed in 22 patients (31%) and aseptic failure in 49 (69%). The alpha defensin ELISA and lateral flow tests were performed in synovial fluid. Patients were classified as having PJI or aseptic failure using the MSIS, the IDSA, and the proposed EBJIS criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and the lateral flow alpha defensin test were calculated. Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curve values were compared. RESULTS: When measured against the proposed EBJIS criteria, the sensitivity of alpha defensin ELISA and the lateral flow test was low and not different from one another with the numbers available at 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-69%) and 46% (95% CI, 27%-65%; p = 0.857), respectively, whereas both methods showed high specificity (98% [95% CI, 88%-100%]; p = 1.000). For sensitivity, the highest values were seen when compared against the MSIS criteria (ELISA: 85% [95% CI, 56%-97%], lateral flow: 77% [95% CI]; p = 0.871), intermediate with IDSA criteria (ELISA: 73% [95% CI, 48%-89%], lateral flow: 67% [95% CI]; p = 0.867), and lowest with proposed EBJIS criteria (ELISA: 50% [95% CI, 31%-69%], lateral flow: 46% [95% CI]; p = 0.763). Specificity, however, was high regardless of the criteria used, where ELISA and lateral flow produced results that were not different (MSIS: 98% [95% CI, 90%-100%], IDSA: 98% [95% CI, 90%-100%], EBJIS: 98% [95% CI, 88%-100%]; p = 1.000). The area under the curve of alpha defensin ELISA and the lateral flow test was similar, regardless of the definition criteria used (EBJIS: p = 0.566; IDSA: p = 0.425; MSIS: p = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between the quantitative and qualitative alpha defensin test for confirmation of PJI, irrespective of applied definition criteria. Having the advantage of providing results within 10 minutes without the need for a laboratory facility, the qualitative test may be of interest in the intraoperative setting, however, at a cost of higher test expense. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study.

Efficacy of different revision procedures for infected megaprostheses in musculoskeletal tumour surgery of the lower limb.

PURPOSE: The incidence of recurrent infections in patients following one or two stage revision for infected megaprostheses after resection of bone tumours was investigated. The difference between retaining at least one well fixed stem and a complete removal of the megaprosthesis during a two stage revision was also analysed. METHODS: 627 patients who experienced a replacement of a musculoskeletal tumour by megaprostheses were recorded. An infection occurred in 83 of 621 patients available for follow-up. 61 patients underwent one stage revision, and 16 patients two stage revision for the first revision surgery. In the entire study period, two stage revision was performed 32 times (first, second, and third revision). RESULTS: The cumulative incidence analysis showed a reinfection probability after one stage revision of 18% at one year, 30% at two years, 39% at five years, 46% at ten years, and 56% at 15 years. After two stage revision, a reinfection probability of 28% at two years, and 48% at five years was calculated. Cumulative incidence curves did not differ significantly (Gray's test; p = 0.51) between one and two stage revision (with and without complete removal of the stems). In two stage revision (n = 32), a statistically significant difference in infection rates between patients treated with complete removal of the megaprosthesis (n = 18) including anchorage stems and patients with at least one retained stem (n = 14) was shown (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Two stage revisions with complete removal of the megaprosthesis showed the best results among limb salvage procedures for the treatment of infected megaprosthesis.