[Quality of life and depression in hearing-impairment : A German survey]. / Lebensqualität und Depression bei Hörminderung : Eine deutsche Bedarfsanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Hearing-impairment can lead to a reduced quality of life and thus represents a vulnerability factor for mental disorders. OBJECTIVE: This study represents the first psychiatric analysis of subjective quality of life and depression in people with hearing-impairment in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient group included 30 hearing-impaired participants (27 women, 3 men) with a current or previous mental disorder and/or psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment (age: mean, M = 49.67 years; standard deviation, SD = 13.54 years). The control group consisted of 22 hearing-impaired participants (16 women, 6 men) without mental disorders or treatment (age: M = 52.41 years, SD = 17.30 years). Besides sociodemographic variables, we registered onset/extent of the various hearing-impairments and hearing aid provision. Both groups underwent extensive diagnostic assessment comprising subjective functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale, SDS), health-related quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey), and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II). RESULTS: Groups did not differ significantly in terms of sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, or intelligence. Participants of the patient group had a significantly greater subjective impairment, a lower quality of life, and more pronounced symptoms of depression. The invasiveness of the hearing aid (i. e., cochlear implant) as well as the timepoint of hearing-impairment onset (postlingually) appear to serve as vulnerability factors for mental health problems in this group. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that besides delivering high-quality acoustic care, practitioners should continuously check patients' requirements for psychosocial treatment due to a loss of quality of life. The development of a specific psychotherapeutic treatment for hearing-impaired clients requires additional research focused on protective and vulnerability factors which may influence the emergence of mental disorders in these patients.

[Analysis of the German state medical examination regarding psychiatrically relevant topics]. / Staatsexamensanalyse hinsichtlich psychiatrisch relevanter Themen.

BACKGROUND: The second part of the state medical examination is an essential part of medical education in Germany. From 2006 until 2013, the second and third parts of the licensing examination were combined, thus earning this examination the reputation of being notoriously difficult to pass. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second examination. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the proportion of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second leg of the German state medical examination. In a second step, a more detailed analysis aimed to identify more specific subject areas and to allocate diagnoses according to ICD-10, allowing a detailed overview of the presence of psychiatric topics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 8 examinations from fall 2010 up to spring 2014 a were included in the analysis. Every examination comprised 320 questions, thus a total of 2560 questions were analyzed. All questions pertaining to psychiatric or psychotherapeutic topics were included. Questions were categorized according to a predefined set of subject areas and an ICD-10 diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of the total of 2560 questions analyzed, 166 were categorized as being in psychiatry or psychotherapy, with each examination comprising an average of 20.75 (SD = 5.80) relevant questions. Most questions were allocated to the subject area of pharmacology (n = 53), followed by psychopathologic assessment (n = 27) and psychotherapy (n = 12). Sorted according to ICD-10 criteria, most questions could be assigned to the F3 category, the affective disorders group (21.9 %, n = 35). CONCLUSION: In comparison to the actual strain placed on the healthcare system, the results indicate an underrepresentation of psychiatric disorders in the second part of the German state medical examination. The distribution of specific disorders mirrors the actual distribution at least in part; however, certain practically relevant disorders are severely underrepresented.