Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Health Educ Behav ; 46(1_suppl): 19S-32S, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549557

RESUMO

Community-based participatory research has a long-term commitment to principles of equity and justice with decades of research showcasing the added value of power-sharing and participatory involvement of community members for achieving health, community capacity, policy, and social justice outcomes. Missing, however, has been a clear articulation of how power operates within partnership practices and the impact of these practices on outcomes. The National Institutes of Health-funded Research for Improved Health study (2009-2013), having surveyed 200 partnerships, then conducted seven in-depth case studies to better understand which partnership practices can best build from community histories of organizing to address inequities. The diverse case studies represented multiple ethnic-racial and other marginalized populations, health issues, and urban and rural areas and regions. Cross-cutting analyses of the qualitative results focus on how oppressive and emancipatory forms of power operate within partnerships in response to oppressive conditions or emancipatory histories of advocacy within communities. The analysis of power was conducted within each of the four domains of the community-based participatory research conceptual model, starting from how contexts shape partnering processes to impact short-term intervention and research outputs, and contribute to outcomes. Similarities and differences in how partnerships leveraged and addressed their unique contexts and histories are presented, with both structural and relational practices that intentionally addressed power relations. These results demonstrate how community members draw from their resilience and strengths to combat histories of injustice and oppression, using partnership principles and practices toward multilevel outcomes that honor community knowledge and leadership, and seek shared power, policy, and community transformation changes, thereby advancing health equity.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/organização & administração , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Empoderamento , Equidade em Saúde/organização & administração , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Política , Características de Residência , Resiliência Psicológica , Estados Unidos
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25768390

RESUMO

Using Community-based and Tribal Participatory Research (CBPR/TPR) approaches, an academic-tribal partnership between the University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute and the Suquamish and Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes developed a culturally grounded social skills intervention to promote increased cultural belonging and prevent substance abuse among tribal youth. Participation in the intervention, which used the Canoe Journey as a metaphor for life, was associated with increased hope, optimism, and self-efficacy and with reduced substance use, as well as with higher levels of cultural identity and knowledge about alcohol and drugs among high school-age tribal youth. These results provide preliminary support for the intervention curricula in promoting positive youth development, an optimistic future orientation, and the reduction of substance use among Native youth.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Cultura , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Identificação Social , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Feminino , Esperança , Humanos , Masculino , Noroeste dos Estados Unidos , Otimismo/psicologia , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Pimatisiwin ; 11(3): 395-409, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25356083

RESUMO

Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches stress the importance of building strong, cohesive collaborations between academic researchers and partnering communities; yet there is minimal research examining the actual quality of CBPR partnerships. The objective of the present paper is to describe and explore the quality of collaborative relationships across the first two years of the Healing of the Canoe project teams, comprised of researchers from the University of Washington and community partners from the Suquamish Tribe. Three quantitative/qualitative process measures were used to assess perceptions regarding collaborative processes and aspects of meeting effectiveness. Staff meetings were primarily viewed as cohesive, with clear agendas and shared communication. Collaborative processes were perceived as generally positive, with Tribal empowerment rated as especially important. Additionally, effective leadership and flexibility were highly rated while a need for a stronger community voice in decision-making was noted. Steady improvements were found in terms of trust between research teams, and both research teams reported a need for more intra-team project- and social-focused interaction. Overall, this data reveals a solid CBPR collaboration that is making effective strides in fostering a climate of respect, trust, and open communication between research partners.

4.
Int J Ment Health Addict ; 8(2): 362-373, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23123765

RESUMO

Indigenous communities have engaged in needs and resources assessments for thousands of years. By blending CBPR/TPR approaches with community-driven assets and needs assessments, academic and community based researchers can work together to better understand and identify community strengths as well as issues of concern in Native communities. This best practice approach can set research agendas that are relevant to Native communities and result in interventions and health promotion programs that are respectful of Tribal sovereignty and that incorporate unique traditions and strengths of Native communities. A successful research partnership to develop and implement a needs and resources assessment using CBPR/TPR approaches is presented using a case study that can be used as a model for other research partnerships.

5.
J Ethn Subst Abuse ; 8(3): 283-300, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20157631

RESUMO

Alcohol and drug abuse are major areas of concern for many American Indian=Alaska Native communities. Research on these problems has often been less than successful, in part because many researchers are not sensitive to the culture and traditions of the tribes and communities with which they are working. They alsooften fail to incorporate tribal customs, traditions, and values into the interventions developed to deal with substance abuse. The authors describe the use of community-based participatory research and tribal participatory research approaches to develop a culturally sensitive substance abuse prevention program for Native youth. This project, The Community Pulling Together: Healing of the Canoe, is a collaboration between the Suquamish Tribe and the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde/etnologia , Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/etnologia , Adulto , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Comportamento Cooperativo , Características Culturais , Feminino , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Washington , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...