Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 184(11): 1485-8, 2001 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11709795

RESUMO

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) can be diagnosed by direct microscopic examination of induced sputum or by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). However, many institutions have little diagnostic success with induced sputum, and BAL is invasive and expensive. This prospective, blinded study assessed oral washes as a more convenient specimen than either sputum or BAL fluid and used a dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoroimmunoassay time-resolved fluorescent hybridization polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection system that is feasible for clinical laboratories. The study assessed 175 oral washes, each paired with either an induced sputum that was positive for Pneumocystis or a BAL sample. The PCR test based on the Pneumocystis major surface glycoprotein primers had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 94%, compared with a test based on mitochondrial large subunit rRNA primers, which had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 96%. These results suggest that oral washes can provide a useful sample for diagnosis of PCP when a sensitive PCR detection system is used.


Assuntos
Boca/microbiologia , Antissépticos Bucais , Pneumocystis/isolamento & purificação , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Lavagem Broncoalveolar , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Erros de Diagnóstico , Humanos , Pneumocystis/genética , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego , Escarro/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA