Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study of an H4 R-antagonist (JNJ-39758979) in adults with uncontrolled asthma.

BACKGROUND: The effects of H4 R antagonists in preclinical asthma models support the study of antagonists of the H4 R in the treatment of asthma in humans. JNJ-39758979 is a potent and highly selective oral H4 R antagonist. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the H4 R-antagonist JNJ-39758979 in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen eligible patients were randomly assigned to JNJ-39758979 300 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks in this phase 2a, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy was assessed via week-12 change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ). Secondary efficacy assessments included patient-reported outcome (PRO) asthma assessments (Asthma Daily Diary data [AM and PM peak expiratory flow rate, number of puffs of albuterol/salbutamol, the presence of nocturnal awakenings and asthma symptom score]). RESULTS: The study did not meet the primary end-point. However, nominally significant improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 were observed with JNJ-39758979 versus placebo at week 12 in pre-specified subgroups with elevated exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils or blood eosinophils at baseline. Nominally significant improvements across PRO assessments were consistently observed in the overall population, as well as in eosinophilic subgroups. Safety, such as adverse event rates, was comparable between JNJ-39758979 and placebo. No serious adverse events were reported. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory values were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings suggest potential benefit of H4 R antagonists on lung function and asthma control in eosinophilic asthma patients and warrant further evaluation of this mechanism in asthma with eosinophilic inflammation. NCT00946569.

Sarcoidosis extent relates to molecular variability.

The molecular basis of sarcoidosis phenotype heterogeneity and its relationship to effective treatment of sarcoidosis have not been elucidated. Peripheral samples from sarcoidosis subjects who participated in a Phase II study of golimumab [anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α] and ustekinumab [anti-interleukin (IL)-12p40] were used to measure the whole blood transcriptome and levels of serum proteins. Differential gene and protein expression analyses were used to explore the molecular differences between sarcoidosis phenotypes as defined by extent of organ involvement. The same data were also used in conjunction with an enrichment algorithm to identify gene expression changes associated with treatment with study drugs compared to placebo. Our analyses revealed marked heterogeneity among the three sarcoidosis phenotypes included in the study cohort, including striking differences in enrichment of the interferon pathway. Conversely, enrichments of multiple pathways, including T cell receptor signalling, were similar among phenotypes. We also identify differences between treatment with golimumab and ustekinumab that may explain the differences in trends for clinical efficacy observed in the trial. We find that molecular heterogeneity is associated with sarcoidosis in a manner that may be related to the extent of organ involvement. These findings may help to explain the difficulty in identifying clinically efficacious sarcoidosis treatments and suggest hypotheses for improved therapeutic strategies.

Longitudinal stability of asthma characteristics and biomarkers from the Airways Disease Endotyping for Personalized Therapeutics (ADEPT) study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a biologically heterogeneous disease and development of novel therapeutics requires understanding of pathophysiologic phenotypes. There is uncertainty regarding the stability of clinical characteristics and biomarkers in asthma over time. This report presents the longitudinal stability over 12 months of clinical characteristics and clinically accessible biomarkers from ADEPT. METHODS: Mild, moderate, and severe asthma subjects were assessed at 5 visits over 12 months. Assessments included patient questionnaires, spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and biomarkers measured in induced sputum. RESULTS: Mild (n = 52), moderate (n = 55), and severe (n = 51) asthma cohorts were enrolled from North America and Western Europe. For all clinical characteristics and biomarkers, group mean data showed no significant change from visit to visit. However, individual data showed considerable variability. FEV1/FVC ratio showed excellent reproducibility while pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FVC were only moderately reproducible. Of note bronchodilator FEV1 reversibility showed low reproducibility, with the nonreversible phenotype much more reproducible than the reversible phenotype. The 7-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ7) demonstrated moderate reproducibility for the combined asthma cohorts, but the uncontrolled asthma phenotype (ACQ7 > 1.5) was inconstant in mild and moderate asthma but stable in severe asthma. FENO demonstrated good reproducibility, with the FENO-low phenotype (FENO < 35 ppb) more stable than the FENO-high phenotype (FENO ≥ 35 ppb). Induced sputum inflammatory phenotypes showed marked variability across the 3 sputum samples taken over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The ADEPT cohort showed group stability, individual stability in some parameters e.g. low FEV1/FVC ratio, and low FENO, but marked individual variability in other clinical characteristics and biomarkers e.g. type-2 biomarkers over 12 months. This variability is possibly related to seasonal variations in climate and allergen exposure, medication changes and acute exacerbations. The implications for patient selection strategies based on clinical biomarkers may be considerable.

Asthma characteristics and biomarkers from the Airways Disease Endotyping for Personalized Therapeutics (ADEPT) longitudinal profiling study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease and development of novel therapeutics requires an understanding of pathophysiologic phenotypes. The purpose of the ADEPT study was to correlate clinical features and biomarkers with molecular characteristics, by profiling asthma (NCT01274507). This report presents for the first time the study design, and characteristics of the recruited subjects. METHODS: Patients with a range of asthma severity and healthy non-atopic controls were enrolled. The asthmatic subjects were followed for 12 months. Assessments included history, patient questionnaires, spirometry, airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and biomarkers measured in induced sputum, blood, and bronchoscopy samples. All subjects underwent sputum induction and 30 subjects/cohort had bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Mild (n = 52), moderate (n = 55), severe (n = 51) asthma cohorts and 30 healthy controls were enrolled from North America and Western Europe. Airflow obstruction, bronchodilator response and airways hyperresponsiveness increased with asthma severity, and severe asthma subjects had reduced forced vital capacity. Asthma control questionnaire-7 (ACQ7) scores worsened with asthma severity. In the asthmatics, mean values for all clinical and biomarker characteristics were stable over 12 months although individual variability was evident. FENO and blood eosinophils did not differ by asthma severity. Induced sputum eosinophils but not neutrophils were lower in mild compared to the moderate and severe asthma cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The ADEPT study successfully enrolled asthmatics across a spectrum of severity and non-atopic controls. Clinical characteristics were related to asthma severity and in general asthma characteristics e.g. lung function, were stable over 12 months. Use of the ADEPT data should prove useful in defining biological phenotypes to facilitate personalized therapeutic approaches.

Effects of JNJ-40929837, a leukotriene A4 hydrolase inhibitor, in a bronchial allergen challenge model of asthma.

UNLABELLED: Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a chemotactic mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma. JNJ-40929837 is an oral inhibitor of LTA4 hydrolase, which catalyzes LTB4 production. We evaluated the effects of JNJ-40929837 in a human bronchial allergen challenge (BAC) model. In this double-blind, 3-period crossover study, 22 patients with mild, atopic asthma were randomized to one of three treatments per period: 100 mg/day JNJ-40929837 for 6 days followed by 50 mg/day on day 7; 10 mg/day montelukast for 6 days; and matched placebo. The BAC was performed on day 6 of each treatment period. Primary outcome was BAC-induced late asthmatic response (LAR) measured by maximal percent reduction in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in one second. Secondary outcomes included early asthmatic response (EAR) by maximal percent reduction in FEV1, EAR and LAR evaluated by area under the FEV1/time curve (AUC0-2, AUC3-10, respectively), change in baseline FEV1 after 5-day treatment, safety, and correlation of JNJ-40929837 to the divalent cation ionophore A23187-stimulated whole blood LTB4 levels and sputum basal LTB4 levels. No significant differences were observed in the primary or secondary FEV1 endpoints with JNJ-40929837 versus placebo. Compared with placebo (n = 17, LS mean = 27.7), there was no significant attenuation of the maximal percent reduction in the LAR FEV1 with JNJ-40929837 (n = 16, LS mean = 28.6, P = 0.63) but montelukast (n = 17, LS mean = 22.6, P = 0.01) significantly attenuated the LAR. JNJ-40929837 substantially inhibited LTB4 production in whole blood, decreased sputum LTB4 levels and was well-tolerated. The number of adverse events leading to study withdrawal was the same in JNJ-40929837 and placebo groups. In conclusion, JNJ-40929837 demonstrated target engagement in blood and sputum. No significant impact in response to allergen inhalation was observed with JNJ-40929837 versus placebo. REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01241422.

Partial versus maximal forced exhalations in COPD: enhanced signal detection for novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of novel compounds for COPD often relies on FEV1 for signal detection. Partial forced exhalations from end-tidal inspiration (PEFV) might complement FEV1 in identifying such a signal. We examined the prevalence of bronchodilator response (BDR) using PEFV and FEV1 in patients with COPD. METHODS: 110 consecutive COPD patients were tested prospectively with PEFV and maximal expiratory flow before and after inhalation of a short-acting ß2 agonist (salbutamol, 400 µg). Partial flow at 800 ml above residual volume was derived from the PEFV (PF800). Significant changes in PF800 and/or FEV1 were set at the upper 95% confidence interval after placebo (n = 28). RESULTS: Four groups were identified by the presence (+) or absence (-) of a BDR: Group 1 [PF800 (-)FEV1(-)] when no change was observed (n = 31), Group 2 [PF800(+)FEV1(-)] when PF800 alone improved (n = 31), Group 3 [PF800(-)FEV1(+)] when FEV1 alone improved (n = 26), and Group 4 [PF800(+)FEV1(+)] when both variables improved (n = 18). There were 35 non-responders in any parameter, and 75/110 subjects who showed a response in at least one parameter. The changes in PF800 and FEV1 were not correlated suggesting these assess different airway generations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PF800 increased detection of a BDR in COPD compared to FEV1 alone and may reflect small airway responses. The PEFV maneuver is simple, repeatable and may avoid some of the theoretical disadvantages of FEV1. The role of PF800 for evaluating novel anti-inflammatory agents remains to be determined.

Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions.

Collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a noninvasive method for obtaining samples from the lungs. EBC contains large number of mediators including adenosine, ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, isoprostanes, leukotrienes, nitrogen oxides, peptides and cytokines. Concentrations of these mediators are influenced by lung diseases and modulated by therapeutic interventions. Similarly EBC pH also changes in respiratory diseases. The aim of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force on EBC was to identify the important methodological issues surrounding EBC collection and assay, to provide recommendations for the measurements and to highlight areas where further research is required. Based on the currently available evidence and the consensus of the expert panel for EBC collection, the following general recommendations were put together for oral sample collection: collect during tidal breathing using a noseclip and a saliva trap; define cooling temperature and collection time (10 min is generally sufficient to obtain 1-2 mL of sample and well tolerated by patients); use inert material for condenser; do not use resistor and do not use filter between the subject and the condenser. These are only general recommendations and certain circumstances may dictate variation from them. Important areas for future research involve: ascertaining mechanisms and site of exhaled breath condensate particle formation; determination of dilution markers; improving reproducibility; employment of EBC in longitudinal studies; and determining the utility of exhaled breath condensate measures for the management of individual patients. These studies are required before recommending this technique for use in clinical practice.

Assessment of exhaled nitric oxide kinetics in healthy infants.

Exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) measurements provide a noninvasive approach to the evaluation of airway inflammation. Flow-independent NO exchange parameters [airway NO transfer factor (D(NO)) and airway wall NO concentration (Cw(NO))] can be estimated from Fe(NO) measurements at low flows and may elucidate mechanisms of disturbances in NO exchange. We measured Fe(NO) in sedated infants by using an adaptation of a raised lung volume rapid thoracic compression technique that creates forced expiration through a mass-flow controller that lasts 5-10 s, at a constant preset flow. We measured Fe(NO) at expired flows of 50, 25, and 15 ml/s in five healthy infants (7-31 mo). Median Fe(NO) increased [24, 40, and 60 parts per billion (ppb)] with decreasing expiratory flows (50, 25, and 15 ml/s). Group median (range) for D(NO) and Cw(NO) were 12.7 (3.2-37) x 10(-3) nl. s(-1). ppb(-1) and 108.9 (49-385) ppb, respectively, similar to values reported in healthy adults. Exhaled NO is flow dependent; flow-independent parameters of exhaled NO kinetics can be assessed in infants and are similar to values described in adults.

Safety of sputum induction in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bronchoprotective sputum induction protocol in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Forty-two adults with COPD (FEV1 = 51.7 +/- 3.2% predicted (mean +/- SEM)) under went sputum induction using a protocol designed to minimize hypertonic saline-induced bronchoconstriction. Hypertonic (3%) saline was used for subjects with FEV1 > or = 50%, and normal (0.9%) saline was used for subjects with FEV1 < 50%. Primary outcomes were change in peak flow, FEV1 and oxygen saturation. Mean decline in peak flow during sputum induction was 13.2 +/- 2.1%. FEV1 fell by 11.4 +/- 2.3%, an absolute fall of 0.14 +/- 0.031. Oxygen saturation did not change. A fall in peak flow of > or = 20% reliably predicted a fall in FEV1 of > or = 20%. Thirty-five of 42 subjects (83.3%) produced an acceptable sputum sample. Sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentages were 2.8 +/- 0.9 and 73.0 +/- 3.0%, respectively, and were not correlated with changes in peak flow, FEV1 or oxygen saturation. A protocol for sputum induction which restricts the use of hypertonic saline based on lung function is both safe and effective in subjects with moderate to severe COPD.

Dose-response relationship and reproducibility of the fall in exhaled nitric oxide after inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate therapy in asthma patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a marker of asthmatic airway inflammation. We determined the dose response and the reproducibility of the FENO fall following inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (iBDP) therapy in nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients. STUDY DESIGN: Study A: For four 1-week periods (period 1 to period 4), the following regimens were administered in sequential order to 15 nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients: period 1, placebo; period 2, 100 microg/d of iBDP; period 3, 400 microg/D of iBDP; and period 4, 800 microg/d of iBDP. Spirometry, FENO, and provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) were measured at each of five visits (visit 1 to visit 5). Study B: During four periods, 12 nonsteroid-treated asthmatic patients received placebo treatment for 7 days (period 1), 200 microg/d of iBDP for 14 days (period 2), washout on placebo treatment until the FENO was within 15% of baseline (period 3), and 200 microg/d of iBDP for 14 days (period 4). RESULTS: Study A: Mean FEV(1) rose progressively from 3.10 L (visit 1) to 3.41 L (visit 5; p = 0.001). All iBDP doses caused a significant FEV(1) rise compared to placebo treatment, but with no significant separation of doses using FEV(1). FENO geometric mean (95% confidence limits) fell progressively from 103.5 parts per billion (ppb) (78.5 to 136.7) to 37.4 ppb (29.1 to 48.0) from visit 1 to visit 5 (p = 0.001). All doses of iBDP resulted in a significant change in FENO from placebo treatment, but with significant separation of only the 100-microg and 800-microg doses by FENO. Geometric mean (95% confidence limits) PC(20) rose progressively from 0.01 mg/mL (0.00 to 0.19) to 0.48 mg/mL (0.01 to 8.1) from visit 1 to visit 5 (p = 0.002). All doses of iBDP resulted in a significant change in PC(20) from baseline or placebo treatment, but with no significant separation of active iBDP doses using PC(20). Study B: FENO fell from 111.56 ppb (80.3 to 155.1) to 66.3 ppb (49.2 to 89.5; p < 0.001) from period 1 to period 2, and from 110.2 ppb (79.3 to 153.1) to 61.7 ppb (42.9 to 88.8; p < 0.001) from period 3 to period 4. There were no significant differences between FENO in period 1 and period 3 (p = 0.83) or between period 2 and period 4 (p = 0.220). CONCLUSIONS: FENO was superior to FEV(1) and PC(20) in separating doses of iBDP. The fall in FENO after two identical administrations of iBDP separated by placebo washout was highly reproducible.

Exhaled nitric oxide correlated with induced sputum findings in COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Neutrophilic airway inflammation may underlie the pathogenesis of COPD. We examined repeated measurements of the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and the correlation with cells and mediators in induced sputum (IS) from patients with COPD. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven COPD subjects (9 men and 2 women, aged 46 to 69 years) with predicted FEV(1) of 45 to 70%. SETTING: A hospital research laboratory. DESIGN: Single-cohort, prospective study with four visits at two weekly intervals. INTERVENTIONS: FENO and spirometry were assessed at all visits, and IS for differential cell count, leukotriene-B(4) (LTB(4)) and interleukin (IL)-8, nitrite, and nitrate at visit 1, visit 3, and visit 4. RESULTS: During the study, there were significant declines in mean percent predicted FEV(1), from 55.2 to 51.6% (p = 0.029), and mean FEV(1)/FVC ratio, from 50.4 to 45.4% (p = 0.001), accompanied by a significant increase in FENO geometric mean (95% confidence limits), from 15.2 (10.9 to 21.2) to 23.6 (17.1 to 32.4) parts per billion (p = 0.037), and sputum LTB(4), from 1.79 (1.03 to 3.11) to 3.57 (1.95 to 6.53) ng/mL (p = 0.033), but no significant change in other sputum parameters. From visits 1 to 4, the change in percent neutrophils correlated with the changes in FENO and IL-8 (r = 0.648, p = 0.028; r = 0.60, p = 0.05, respectively). Hypertonic saline solution induction of sputum caused a fall in FEV(1), from 1.83 +/- 0.44 to 1.46 +/- 0.44 L (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The worsening spirometry results were accompanied by significant increases in FENO and sputum LTB(4). FENO may be related to neutrophilic inflammation driven by the chemoattractant IL-8. FENO and IS may be useful markers of airway inflammation in COPD patients. Sputum induction with hypertonic saline solution causes a significant fall in FEV(1) requiring appropriate caution.

Exhaled nitric oxide as an indicator of severity of asthmatic inflammation.

Traditional assessment of severity of asthma relies on an evaluation of signs and symptoms and pulmonary function tests. These pulmonary function tests, such as peak expiratory flow rates, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow rates, are indirect measures of airway caliber only, and not inflammation. Since asthma is an inflammatory disease, a measure of the degree of inflammation would be helpful in quantitating severity and titrating of anti-inflammatory therapy. A noninvasive method for measuring pulmonary inflammation would therefore be helpful to assist the emergency physician in initial treatment and assist in titration of anti-inflammatory therapy during repeat visits. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) assays are convenient and practical and may fulfill this role. In this review, we discuss the role of NO in asthmatic inflammation and the role that exhaled NO values may play in the emergency management of asthma.

FE(NO): relationship to exhalation rates and online versus bag collection in healthy adolescents.

Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) is a noninvasive and practical method for assessing airway inflammation. We conducted this investigation to determine the most appropriate flow rate for FE(NO) measurement and to obtain normal values for FE(NO). We determined which expiratory flow was easy to sustain, generated reproducible values, and provided good correlation between offline and online measurements. Thirty-two healthy subjects (15- 18 yr old) underwent spirometry and FE(NO) measurements, using a chemiluminescent NO analyzer at expiratory flow rates of 46, 31, 23, 15, 10, 7, 5, and 4 ml/s. The major findings were as follows: (1) FE(NO) increased as flow rates decreased, with strong correlation between FE(NO) values and flow rates at the four highest flows (0. 85- 0.93, p < 0.001); (2) there were no significant differences and good agreement between offline bag and online FE(NO) values for the four highest flows (p < 0.09-0.83); (3) online FE(NO) values increased with age 15-17 yr at all flow rates, but decreased at age 18 yr; and (4) using multiple regression, significant predictors of FE(NO) were flow, body surface area, age, and FEF(25-75). On the basis of these results, we provide FE(NO) values for healthy adolescents and propose that the ideal flow rate for children is between 30 and 50 ml/s.

Noninvasive measurement of airway inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum. Current status and future use.

The recent use of IS and the analysis of exhaled mediators such as NO are important steps forward in our ability to noninvasively assess airway inflammation without the need to resort to bronchoscopy. Exhaled NO and IS are complementary techniques that provide different information (Table 1). Induced sputum can provide knowledge regarding the cells and mediators participating in the inflammatory response, but is time consuming and expensive. Exhaled NO measurement is performed simply and quickly, and is a nonspecific marker of an inflammatory process. The initial capital costs of equipment for NO analysis are high, however. Once the problems of standardized collection and oropharyngeal contamination have been dealt with, BC may also prove to be an additional tool for the assessment of airway inflammation. It is likely that the next 10 years will see the establishment of these noninvasive tools for the clinical assessment of airway inflammation and oxidative stress, and change the entire way we manage asthma.

Airway nitric oxide diffusion in asthma: Role in pulmonary function and bronchial responsiveness.

If the nitric oxide (NO) diffusing capacity of the airways (DNO) is the quantity of NO diffusing per unit time into exhaled gas (q) divided by the difference between the concentration of NO in the airway wall (Cw) and lumen, then DNO and C(w) can be estimated from the relationship between exhaled NO concentration and expiratory flow. In 10 normal subjects and 25 asthmatic patients before and after treatment with inhaled beclomethasone, DNO averaged 6.8 +/- 1.2, 25.5 +/- 3.8, and 22.3 +/- 2.7 nl/s/ppb x 10(-3), respectively; C(w) averaged 149 +/- 31.9, 255.3 +/- 46.4, and 108.3 +/- 14.3 ppb, respectively; and DNOC(w) (the maximal from diffusion) averaged 1,020 +/- 157.5, 6,512 +/- 866, and 2,416 +/- 208.5 nl/s x 10(-3), respectively. DNO and DNOC(w) in the asthmatic subjects before and after steroids were greater than in normal subjects (p < 0.0001), but C(w) was not different. Within asthmatic subjects, steroids caused C(w) and DNOC(w) to fall (p < 0.0001), but DNO was unchanged. DNOC(w) after steroids, presumably reflecting maximal diffusion of constitutive NO, was positively correlated with methacholine PC(20) and FEV(1)/FVC before or after steroids. The increased DNO measured in asthmatic patients may reflect upregulation of nonadrenergic, noncholinergic, NO-producing nerves in airways in compensation for decreased sensitivity of airway smooth muscle to the relaxant effects of endogenous NO.

Endogenous nitric oxide in allergic airway disease.

There has been intense research into the role nitric oxide (NO) plays in physiologic and pathologic mechanisms. The presence of NO in exhaled breath and the high concentrations in nasal airways stimulated many studies examining exhaled and nasal NO as potential markers of airway inflammation, enabling repeated monitoring of airway inflammation not possible with invasive tests (eg, bronchoscopy). In airway inflammation, NO is not merely a marker but may have anti-inflammatory and proinflammatory effects. Nasal NO measurement may be used in the noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of nasal disease. This review was compiled by speakers who gave presentations on NO at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology in 1999 on exhaled and nasal NO, in vitro studies of NO, the chemistry of airway NO formation, and standardized measurement of exhaled mediators.

Exhaled nitric oxide before and after montelukast sodium therapy in school-age children with chronic asthma: a preliminary study.

Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) is a surrogate marker of airway inflammation in asthma. In 12 children aged 6-11 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma, ENO concentrations were measured before and after 4 weeks of treatment with montelukast sodium, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and 2 weeks after withdrawal of therapy. Baseline ENO levels (mean and 95% confidence interval) were significantly elevated in patients with asthma compared to age-matched nonasthmatic control subjects, with levels of 83 (42-123) vs. 13 (11-15) ppb (P < 0.001). After treatment with montelukast sodium, there was a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in ENO to 58 (27-89) ppb which again rose to 69 (38-99) ppb 2 weeks after treatment was withdrawn. During treatment, the fall in ENO was accompanied by nonsignificant improvements in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from 81-85% predicted or reductions in use of albuterol from a mean of 2.5 to 1.6 puffs/day. Individual ENO measurements and change in ENO concentrations with treatment did not correlate with either pulmonary function changes or use of bronchodilator. These data show that ENO is elevated in children with relatively mild asthma treated with bronchodilator alone, and that treatment with montelukast sodium for 4 weeks results in a significant reduction in ENO concentrations, even in the absence of significant changes in pulmonary function. These findings suggest an anti-inflammatory role for leukotriene D(4) receptor antagonism in the treatment of children with mild to moderate asthma.

A method for the standardized offline collection of exhaled nitric oxide.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) is a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. The purpose of this study was to compare a standardized offline ENO measurement apparatus with a validated on-line method. DESIGN: Asthmatic volunteers (n = 21) had ENO measured by the two following methods: (1) inhalation to total lung capacity (TLC) followed by exhalation at a constant flow (45 mL/s) against a high resistance, while monitoring nitric oxide (NO) and pressure on-line; and (2) inhalation to TLC and exhalation into mylar balloons via an apparatus that included the same resistance and flow rate as used in the on-line method. We also examined NO stability in mylar balloons over 48 h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ENO values (given as geometric mean in parts per billion [ppb]; 95% confidence intervals) differed between the on-line method (69.6; 42.6 to 113.8) and the offline method (49.5; 30.9 to 79.3), indicating that the offline method gave lower ENO measures than the on-line method (p < 0.001). Furthermore, this difference between measures increased with increasing mean values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (0.931), however, showed excellent correlation between the on-line and offline methods. Within-subject repeatability, as assessed by the coefficient of repeatability (CR), was good for both the on-line and offline methods (CR, 1.09 and 1.17, respectively). Geometric mean NO concentrations (95% confidence limits) in mylar balloons containing exhalate increased from a baseline of 55.8 ppb (36.9, 84.4) to 64.5 ppb (45.6, 91.1) and 69.5 ppb (51.4, 94.0) at 24 h and 48 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The offline method gave reproducible ENO values that were consistently smaller than, but showed good correlation with, values obtained with on-line ENO collection. This method is suitable for offline collection, but the measured values are not interchangeable with those obtained by on-line measurement.

Exhaled nitric oxide measurements in childhood asthma: techniques and interpretation.

In this review, we outline the role of nitric oxide in airway inflammation in children with asthma. We also discuss the various methods reported for measuring exhaled nitric oxide and provide some insight as to the pros and cons and pitfalls of these techniques. Guidelines for measurements of exhaled nitric oxide based on our experience are provided, as well as suggestions for the use of this technique as a new "airway inflammation test."