Temporal trends in baseline characteristics and peri-procedural complications of percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main disease: a single high-volume center experience.

AIM: Percutaneous drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is commonly used in patients with unprotected left main (ULM) disease. As this procedure has been performed routinely in Turin Center since 2002, this article aimed to summarize a five year-experience in DES implantation in the ULM. METHODS: Baseline, procedural and in-hospital outcome data of all patients with ULM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES between July 2002 and October 2006 at Turin Center have been collected. Patients were randomized into four groups: A (patients treated between July 2002 and December 2003), B (treated in 2004), C (treated in 2005) and D (treated in 2006). The baseline surgical risk features was to be compared with the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, disease location in the ULM, and in-hospital major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, repeat percutaneous revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Out of a total of 4 432 coronary interventional procedures 198 patients treated with DES in the ULM were identified. There was a significant increase in the number of patients treated (P=0.00095), but no difference in EuroSCORE across groups (P=0.14). Conversely, there was a significant temporal trend in the incidence of bifurcational ULM being treated with DES (P=0.03). Intriguingly, despite this increase in adverse lesion characteristics, no significant increase was found in the rate of in-hospital MACCE (P=0.93). CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, the number of patients being treated with DES for ULM disease has risen across the years, although keeping a similar surgical risk profile. Distal ULM involvement is no longer considered an absolute contraindication to PCI, as testified by the increasing frequency of such lesion among patients undergoing DES implantation at this Institution, with remarkably low rates of adverse events.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V): systematic review and direct-indirect comparison meta-analyses with paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus) and sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher).

First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have brought major improvements in results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is currently debate on the safety of these first-generation DES, given the potential for late stent thrombosis, especially after discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Second-generation DES, such as zotarolimus- (Endeavor) and everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V), have recently become available in the USA and/or Europe. Indeed, the Xience V stent holds the promise of superior anti-restenotic efficacy as well as long-term safety, yet there is uncertainty on its risk-benefit balance. Authors conducted a systematic review of basic science and clinical evidence on the Xience V, by thoroughly searching PubMed and online databases (updated September 2007). They also compared the clinical results of Xience V vs paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus) and sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher) by means of direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis. A total of three clinical studies has been retrieved focusing on Xience V, however both most recent and important trials were still unpublished. The first trial compared Xience V vs bare-metal stents, whereas the other two randomized trials compared Xience V vs Taxus. Direct meta-analysis of Xience V vs Taxus showed that Xience V was significantly superior to Taxus in preventing binary angiographic restenosis and target lesion revascularization (P<0.05 for both). Indirect comparison between Xience V and Cypher, exploiting a recent 16-trial large meta-analysis, showed that Xience V was at least as effective as Cypher in preventing target lesion revascularization (P=0.12). Everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V) appear as a major breakthrough in coronary interventions, and superior efficacy has already been demonstrated in comparison to paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus). Data available to date also suggest that Xience V is at least as effective as sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher). Whether long-term results and direct comparison to Cypher will also be favorable remains to be established by future clinical trials.

Percutaneous unprotected left main angioplasty with drug-eluting stents in a nonagenarian: feasible and safe despite recurrent restenosis.

The management of severe coronary artery disease in the very elderly is challenging and the most appropriate revascularization strategy highly debated. To date, coronary artery bypass surgery has been the treatment of choice for significant stenosis of unprotected left main (ULM) coronary. Whether this holds true also in very old patients is unknown. The Authors hereby report the case of a 91-year-old diabetic man who underwent coronary angiography in June 2005 for subacute unstable angina. Angiography disclosed a critical stenoses in the distal unprotected left main, left anterior descending, and distal left circumflex, which were treated with a paclitaxel-eluting stent and a bare-metal stent (BMS), respectively. Four months later, recurrent angina lead to a second angiography which showed critical restenosis in the left anterior descending and significant ostial stenosis in the left circumflex. Another paclitaxel-eluting stent was implanted in the left anterior descending, followed by kissing balloon in the left main, achieving a good angiographic result. Six months later angina recurred again: at angiography diffuse restenosis in the left main, left anterior descending and left circumflex was documented. A crushing technique was thus employed to deliver 2 sirolimus-eluting stents, achieving a satisfactory final result. Since then, and to date for more than 17 months since the last procedure, this nonagenarian has remained free from anginal chest. This case highlights the potentials and drawbacks of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease, suggesting nonetheless, that this revascularization strategy can be safely repeated even in elderly patients.