Latin American consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in people with multiple sclerosis treated with disease modifying drugs.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of several therapeutic options in multiple sclerosis (MS), which significantly modify the immune system functioning, has led to the need for the consideration of additional factors, such as risk of infections, in the decision-making process. The aim of these consensus recommendations was to discuss and perform a practical guide to Latin American neurologists on the risk of infections at diagnosis, follow-up and prior to initiation of DMDs. METHODS: A panel of Latin American neurologists, experts in demyelinating diseases and dedicated to management and care of MS patients, gathered during 2021 and 2022 to make consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in PwMS treated with DMDs in Latin America. The RAND/UCLA methodology was developed to synthesize the scientific evidence and expert opinions on health care topics and was used for reaching a formal agreement. RESULTS: Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion, focusing on: 1- baseline infection disease and vaccination status; 2- opportunistic infections; 3- progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; 4- genitourinary system infections; 5- respiratory tract infections; 6- digestive system infections, 7-others local infections and 8- COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of this consensus seek to optimize the care, management and treatment of PwMS in Latin America. The standardized evidence-based care of pwMS infections will allow better outcomes.

Evaluation of adherence to treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis from Latin America.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Several factors have been associated with poor adherence to disease-modifying drugs (DMD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the adherence to DMD in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in Argentina and Ecuador. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. The study was carried out between June 2020 and October 2020, and 303 PwMS treated with DMD were included. Patients undergoing immune reconstitution treatments were excluded. Two definitions of DMD adherence were previously determined. Adherence to MS treatments was assessed using the multiple sclerosis treatment adherence questionnaire (MS-TAQ). The logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors related to adherence, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULT: The mean age at study entry for patients was 40.7 ± 11.2 years, 207 (68.3%) were female, and the mean EDSS score was 2.2 ± 1.9. The overall adherence in our sample was 78.1% (79.7% in Argentina and 76% Ecuador, p = 0.23). Patients using infusion therapies significantly more often belonged to the adherent group (p = 0.042). Sharing decision-making (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.7-6.9, p = 0.01), lower EDSS (OR = 0.8, 95% IC: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.004), and lower treatment duration (OR = 0.8, 95% IC: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of adherence in our multivariate model. CONCLUSION: We found a prevalence of non-adherence similar to that previously reported. Furthermore, new factors associated with lower adherence were identified.

¿ Can COVID-19 exacerbate multiple sclerosis symptoms? A case series analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral inflammation can exacerbate pre-existing lesions in the Central Nervous System (CNS) in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, including Multiple Sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical effect of COVID-19 infection, as a generator of peripheral inflammation, in a MS patients group. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 400 medical records of MS patients from a referral center was carried out. MS patients who presented COVID-19 were surveyed about symptoms exacerbation: type, duration and onset of exacerbation, previous vaccination against COVID-19 and MS severity. Clinical and demographic information from the medical records were included. Descriptive and inferential analysis were performed using the GraphPad Prism V6. RESULTS: 41 patients were included, 61% (n = 25) reported neurological worsening, 9.7% (n = 4) as relapses, and 7.3% (n = 3) required corticosteroids. We found significant differences in the EDSS between patients who exacerbated their MS symptoms and those who did not (p = 0.03). When performing a multivariate regression analysis, we found that EDSS was independently associated with the presence of exacerbations of MS in the context of SARS-CoV2 infection (OR = 2.44, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that COVID-19 infection could trigger exacerbations of MS symptoms. New studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 and MS.

[Atypical clinical manifestations as a form of presentation in multiple sclerosis]. / Manifestaciones clínicas atípicas como forma de presentación de la esclerosis múltiple.

The atypical clinical features in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been rarely reported and suggest the possibility of an alternative diagnosis. The aim was to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of MS patients who debuted with atypical symptoms and to estimate the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for MS diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of clinical records was performed. The following data were recorded: patients with MS diagnosis according to current diagnostic criteria at the time of diagnosis, type of symptom at the onset, time to second relapse, presence of oligoclonal bands (OCB) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and radiological red flags on MRI. A descriptive and inferential analysis was performed using the chi square test, and sensitivity, specificity and PPV were calculated. Six hundred two patients were diagnosed with MS, of which 22 (3.65%) had an atypical clinical presentation. 54.5% were women. The mean age was 29 years (SD ± 11.7). The most common atypical symptom was peripheral facial palsy (27%). The PPV for atypical onset was 6.14%; p < 0.001. Sensitivity and specificity of these symptoms to MS diagnosis were 3.65% and 19%, respectively. In our research, the presence of atypical symptoms at the onset of MS was very low. Other diseases must be excluded, taking into account their low sensitivity, specificity and PPV.

Las manifestaciones clínicas atípicas al inicio de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) son poco frecuentes y sugieren la posibilidad de un diagnóstico alternativo. El objetivo fue describir las características clínicas en la EM con síntomas atípicos al inicio, y estimar la sensibilidad, especificidad y valor predictivo positivo (VPP) para el diagnóstico de EM. Se trata de un análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas. Se registraron los siguientes datos: pacientes con diagnóstico de EM acorde a los criterios diagnósticos correspondientes, tipo de síntoma de inicio, tiempo hasta la segunda recaída, presencia de bandas oligoclonales en el líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) y de banderas rojas radiológicas en la Resonancia Magnética de encéfalo (RMN). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo e inferencial utilizando la prueba de chi cuadrado y se calcularon la sensibilidad, la especificidad y el VPP. Seiscientos dos pacientes tuvieron un diagnóstico final de EM, de los cuales 22 (3.7%) tuvieron una presentación clínica atípica. El 54.5% eran mujeres. La edad promedio fue de 29 años (DE ± 11.7). El síntoma atípico más frecuente fue parálisis facial periférica aislada (6/22). El VPP para el inicio atípico fue de 6.1%; p < 0001. La sensibilidad y especificidad de estos síntomas al diagnóstico de EM fueron del 3.7% y 19%, respectivamente. En nuestra cohorte, demostramos que la presencia de síntomas atípicos como presentación de la EM es poco frecuente. Es mandatorio la exclusión de otras enfermedades, teniendo en cuenta su baja sensibilidad, especificidad y VPP.

Evaluation of short-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis from Latin America.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no data available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Characterize safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American (LATAM) patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study between February 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021. Individuals with MS from LATAM countries were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey, through MS patient organizations from the region. RESULTS: 393 vaccinated pwMS from 10 different Latin American countries were included. The vaccines administered were: inactivated virus vaccines (IVV) in 38.2% of patients, adenovirus vector vaccines (AdV) in 48.8% and mRNA vaccines 13%. All patients received at least one dose of any of the COVID-19 vaccines and 123 (31.3%) declared receiving a second dose. Mean (SD) age 41.5 (11.8) years, 82.4% female, MS disease duration: 8.4 (8.2) years. No serious adverse events were reported with any of the COVID-19 vaccines after either the first or second dose. A lower frequency of adverse events was found with IVV (22%) in comparison with AdV (46.4%) and mRNA (35.3%) (p < 0.01). Five participants reported having an MS relapse after IVV first dose. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines applied in LATAM proved safe for MS patients.

Manifestaciones clínicas atípicas como forma de presentación de la esclerosis múltiple / Atypical clinical manifestations as a form of presentation in multiple sclerosis

Resumen Las manifestaciones clínicas atípicas al inicio de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) son poco frecuentes y sugieren la posibilidad de un diagnóstico alternativo. El objetivo fue describir las características clínicas en la EM con síntomas atípicos al inicio, y estimar la sensibilidad, especificidad y valor predictivo posi tivo (VPP) para el diagnóstico de EM. Se trata de un análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas. Se registraron los siguientes datos: pacientes con diagnóstico de EM acorde a los criterios diagnósticos correspondientes, tipo de síntoma de inicio, tiempo hasta la segunda recaída, presencia de bandas oligoclonales en el líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) y de banderas rojas radiológicas en la Resonancia Magnética de encéfalo (RMN). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo e inferencial utilizando la prueba de chi cuadrado y se calcularon la sensibilidad, la especificidad y el VPP. Seiscientos dos pacientes tuvieron un diagnóstico final de EM, de los cuales 22 (3.7%) tuvieron una presentación clínica atípica. El 54.5% eran mujeres. La edad promedio fue de 29 años (DE ± 11.7). El síntoma atípico más frecuente fue parálisis facial periférica aislada (6/22). El VPP para el inicio atípico fue de 6.1%; p < 0001. La sensibilidad y especificidad de estos síntomas al diagnóstico de EM fueron del 3.7% y 19%, respectivamente. En nuestra cohorte, demostramos que la presencia de síntomas atípicos como presentación de la EM es poco frecuente. Es mandatorio la exclusión de otras enfermedades, teniendo en cuenta su baja sensibilidad, especificidad y VPP.

Abstract The atypical clinical features in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been rarely reported and suggest the possibility of an alternative diagnosis. The aim was to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of MS patients who debuted with atypical symptoms and to estimate the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for MS diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of clinical records was performed. The following data were recorded: patients with MS diagnosis according to current diagnostic criteria at the time of diagnosis, type of symptom at the onset, time to second relapse, presence of oligoclonal bands (OCB) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and radiological red flags on MRI. A descriptive and inferential analysis was performed using the chi square test, and sensitivity, specificity and PPV were calculated. Six hundred two patients were diagnosed with MS, of which 22 (3.65%) had an atypical clinical presentation. 54.5% were women. The mean age was 29 years (SD ± 11.7). The most common atypical symptom was peripheral facial palsy (27%). The PPV for atypical onset was 6.14%; p < 0.001. Sensitivity and specificity of these symptoms to MS diagnosis were 3.65% and 19%, respectively. In our research, the presence of atypical symptoms at the onset of MS was very low. Other diseases must be excluded, taking into account their low sensitivity, specificity and PPV.

Radiologically isolated syndrome: from biological bases to practical management.

BACKGROUND: Technological advances and greater availability of magnetic resonance imaging have prompted an increment on incidental and unexpected findings within the central nervous system. The concept of radiologically isolated syndrome characterizes a group of subjects with images suggestive of demyelinating disease in the absence of a clinical episode compatible with multiple sclerosis. Since the description of this entity, many questions have arisen; some have received responses but others remain unanswered. A panel of experts met with the objective of performing a critical review of the currently available evidence. Definition, prevalence, biological bases, published evidence, and implications on patient management were reviewed. Thirty to 50% of subjects with radiologically isolated syndrome will progress to multiple sclerosis in 5 years. Male sex, age < 37 years old, and spinal lesions increase the risk. These subjects should be evaluated by a multiple sclerosis specialist, carefully excluding alternative diagnosis. An initial evaluation should include a brain and complete spine magnetic resonance, visual evoked potentials, and identification of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid. Disease-modifying therapies could be considered when oligoclonal bands or radiological progression is present. CONCLUSION: At present time, radiologically isolated syndrome cannot be considered a part of the multiple sclerosis spectrum. However, a proportion of patients may evolve to multiple sclerosis, meaning it represents much more than just a radiological finding.

Consenso sobre la identificación y seguimiento de la esclerosis múltiple secundaria progresiva en Argentina / Argentinean consensus guidelines on the identification and clinical care of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: Existen diferencias significativas en el diagnóstico, la identificación y el seguimiento de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple secundaria progresiva (EMSP) entre los profesionales de la salud a cargo de su tratamiento. OBJETIVO: Proveer recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento de los pacientes con EMSP en Argentina con el fin de optimizar su cuidado. DESARROLLO: Un grupo de neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple de Argentina elaboró un consenso para el tratamiento de pacientes con EMSP en la región mediante metodología de ronda de encuestas a distancia y reuniones presenciales. Se establecieron 33 recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia publicada y en el criterio de los expertos que participaron. Las recomendaciones se enfocaron en el diagnóstico y el seguimiento de los pacientes con EMSP. CONCLUSIÓN: Las recomendaciones establecidas en el presente consenso permitirían optimizar el cuidado y el seguimiento de los pacientes con EMSP en Argentina

INTRODUCTION: The identification, diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) show significant differences between health care professionals in Argentina. AIM: To provide consensus recommendations on the management of patients with SPMS in Argentina to optimize patient care. DEVELOPMENT: A panel of expert neurologists from Argentina dedicated to the diagnosis and care of multiple sclerosis patients gathered during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the diagnosis and treatment of SPMS patients in Argentina. To achieve consensus, the methodology of formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method was used. Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. Recommendations focused on how to define SPMS and how to follow SPMS patients. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of this consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the care of SPMS patients in Argentina

Usage trend of oral drugs for multiple sclerosis patients in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, numerous disease modifying drugs (DMDs) for relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been approved in Argentina. The use of oral DMDs (oDMDs) has increased in recent years, although real-life data in our region is limited. We aimed to describe the tendency in the use of oDMDs (as first treatment option or after switch) in relationship with their approval in Argentina. METHODS: A retrospective study in a cohort of MS patients from five Argentinian MS centers was conducted. Regarding the availability of different oDMDs in Argentina, we define three periods (P1-3): P1: 2012 - 2014; P2: 2015 - 2017 and P3: 2018 - 2020. An analysis was performed comparing between these three periods to assess the tendency for oDMDs use over time. RESULT: The most frequently prescribed treatment as first DMD was: interferon beta 1a (40%) in P1, fingolimod (37.3%) in P2 and also fingolimod (35%) in P3. We found an increase in the use of oDMTs as initial treatment over time (P1: 17.7%, P2: 63.9% and P3: 65.0%; Chi-square = 41.9 p <0.01). We also found a tendency to increase the use of oDMTs after a first switch (P1: 45.5%, P2: 60.1% and P3 78.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that disease evolution (OR=1.06, p=0.04), and year of treatment initiation (OR=1.01 p<0.01) were independently associated with choice of oDMTs. CONCLUSION: This study identified an increasing tendency for the use of oDMDs as initial treatment of RMS in relationship with their approval in Argentina.

Multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in Argentina: comparing baseline data from the Argentinean MS Registry (RelevarEM).

The objective of this study was to describe and compare the baseline epidemiological data of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients included in RelevarEM (Clinical Trials registry number NCT03375177). METHODS: RelevarEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational MS and NMOSD registry in Argentina. Epidemiological and comorbidity data from MS and NMOSD patients were described and compared. For comorbidities, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was used to calculate the burden at entry. CCI was stratified in 0 and ≥ 1 and described for the entire cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1588 and 75 MS and NMOSD patients (respectively) were included. For MS patients, the mean age was 42 ± 7 years, female sex 65.3%, mean EDSS 2, and mean disease duration 8 ± 6 years. In NMOSD, the mean age was 40 ± 7 years, female sex 78.7%, mean disease duration 5 ± 3.5 years, and mean EDSS 2.5. The most frequent MS phenotype was RRMS in 82.4%. In MS, the CCI was 0 in 85.8.2% while ≥ 1 was in 14.2% of patients. Regarding phenotype stratification, CCI ≥ 1 was 3.9% in CIS, 13.5% in RRMS, 28.7% in SPMS, and 17.4% in PPMS (p < 0.001 between groups). In NMOSD, the CCI was 0 in 64% while ≥ 1 was in 36%. The MS/NMOSD ratio found was 21/1. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first analysis of the longitudinal Argentinean registry of MS and NMOSD describing and comparing conditions that contributes to provide reliable real-world data in the country.

Consensus recommendations on the management of multiple sclerosis patients in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: During the last 20 years, multiple sclerosis (MS) disease has seen major changes with new diagnostic criteria, a better identification of disease phenotypes, individualization of disease prognosis and the appearance of new therapeutic options in relapsing remitting as well as progressive MS. As a result, the management of MS patients has become more complex and challenging. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to review how the disease should be managed in Argentina to improve long-term outcomes in MS patients. METHODS: A panel of 36 experts in neurology from Argentina, dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients, gathered both virtually and in person during 2018 and 2019 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the management of MS patients in Argentina. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used. RESULTS: Recommendations focused on diagnosis, disease prognosis, tailored treatment, treatment failure identification and pharmacovigilance process. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations of these consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the health care and management of patients with MS in Argentina.

The Argentinean multiple sclerosis registry (RelevarEM): Methodological aspects and directions.

Despite that different registries already exist in various countries in Europe and North America, no ongoing nationwide registry exists in Latin America (LATAM), a region where the disease behaves differently than in other regions. The objective of this document is to describe the methodology behind RelevarEM, the first nationwide MS registry in Argentina and LATAM. METHODS: In this article, we described the creation, implementation and data management of the nationwide MS registry in Argentina. The registry contains information on the structure, ethical aspects, implementation and variables of the registry (Clinical Trials registry number NCT NCT03375177). CONCLUSION: RelevarEM is the first MS nationwide registry in Argentina, as well as in LATAM, with the objective of providing reliable real-world data of MS in the country.

Argentinean recommendations on the identification of treatment failure in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

One of the biggest challenges in multiple sclerosis (MS) is the definition of treatment response/failure in order to optimize treatment decisions in affected patients. The objective of this consensus was to review how disease activity should be assessed and to propose recommendations on the identification of treatment failure in RRMS patients in Argentina. METHODS: A panel of experts in neurology from Argentina, dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients, gathered both virtually and in person during 2016 and 2017 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the identification of treatment failure in RRMS patients. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used. RESULTS: Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. Recommendations focused on disease management, disease activity markers and treatment failure identification were determined. Main consensus were: ≥2 relapses during the first year of treatment and/or ≥3 new or enlarged T2 or T1 GAD+ lesions and/or sustained increase of ≥2 points in EDSS or ≥100% in T25FW defines treatment failure in RRMS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations of this consensus guidelines attempts to optimize the health care and management of patients with MS in Argentina.