Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endod ; 43(9S): S25-S30, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28778505

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Wnt signaling through lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) and Frizzled6 on the endothelial differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). DPSCs were stably transduced with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-tagged lentiviral vectors (short hairpin RNA-LRP6, short hairpin RNA-Frizzled6, or empty vector controls). We evaluated the effects of LRP6 and Frizzled6 on expression of endothelial markers and on capillary tube formation mediated by DPSCs induced with recombinant human Wnt1 (rhWnt1) and/or recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor165 (rhVEGF165). In vivo, tooth slices/scaffolds were seeded with LRP6-silenced, Frizzled6-silenced, or vector control DPSC cells and transplanted into immunodeficient mice. The density of blood vessels generated by DPSCs differentiated into vascular endothelial cells was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for EGFP. The rhWnt1 and rhVEGF165 induced expression of active ß-catenin in control DPSCs and in Frizzled6-silenced DPSCs, but not in LRP6-silenced DPSCs. Furthermore, VEGF and interleukin-8 were downregulated in LRP6-silenced DPSCs, but not in control DPSCs or in Frizzled6-silenced DPSCs (P < .05). Likewise, rhWnt1 and rhVEGF165 induced expression of the endothelial marker VEGF receptor-2 in control DPSCs and in Frizzled6-silenced DPSCs, but not in LRP6-silenced DPSCs. These data correlated with a trend for lower density of capillary sprouts generated by LRP6-silenced DPSCs when compared with control DPSCs in Matrigel. In vivo, tooth slice/scaffolds seeded with DPSC-short hairpinRNA-LRP6 cells showed lower density of human blood vessels (ie, EGFP-positive blood vessels), when compared with tooth slice/scaffolds seeded with vector control cells (P < .05). Collectively, these data demonstrated that LRP6 signaling is necessary for the vasculogenic differentiation of human DPSCs.


Assuntos
Diferenciação Celular/fisiologia , Polpa Dentária/citologia , Proteína-6 Relacionada a Receptor de Lipoproteína de Baixa Densidade/fisiologia , Transdução de Sinais , Células-Tronco/fisiologia , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Humanos , Camundongos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Via de Sinalização Wnt
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(4): 815-9, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319976

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The development of endodontic sealers based on natural resins seems to be promising, given their improved biological properties. This study evaluated the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of two experimental root canal sealers, based on extracts from Copaifera multijuga and Ricinus communis (castor oil polymer), comparing them to synthetic resin-based sealers: a single methacrylate-based, a multi-methacrylate-based, and an epoxy resin-based sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sealers were prepared, set, and exposed to cell culture medium for 24 h at 37 °C with CO2. V79 cells were exposed to serial dilutions of the extracts of each sealer for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay and genotoxicity was assessed by the formation of micronuclei. RESULTS: The single methacrylate-based sealer had the most cytotoxic effects, with significant reduction in cell viability in all dilutions of the extract. The castor oil polymer-based sealer was, on the other hand, the most biocompatible sealer, with no cytotoxic effects at any concentration. All tested sealers were not genotoxic, excepting the single methacrylate-based sealer. CONCLUSIONS: The tested natural resin-based sealers presented low cytotoxic and no genotoxic effects on cell cultures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results may suggest a good alternative to develop new endodontic sealers, in order to achieve better biological response and healing, when compared to commercially available sealers.


Assuntos
Dano ao DNA , Metacrilatos/toxicidade , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/toxicidade , Resinas Epóxi , Humanos , Resinas Sintéticas
3.
J Endod ; 40(4): 530-3, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24666905

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Biocompatibility of root canal sealers is important because of the long-term contact of their eluates and/or degradation products with periapical tissues. The literature still lacks studies about the genotoxic effects of these materials and the influence of setting time on biological properties. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus), a single methacrylate-based sealer (EndoRez), and a silicone-based sealer (RoekoSeal) were assessed. METHODS: Chinese hamster fibroblasts (V79) were cultured and exposed to different dilutions of extracts from the sealers that were left to set for 0, 12, and 24 hours before contact with culture medium. Cell viability was measured by the methyl-thiazol-diphenyltetrazolium assay. Genotoxicity was assessed by the comet assay. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (P < .05). RESULTS: Root canal sealers were statistically more cytotoxic than the untreated control group, except for the silicon-based sealer. Cell viability ranking was the following (from the most to the least cytotoxic): methacrylate-based > epoxy resin-based > silicone-based. The setting time influenced the epoxy resin-based sealer cytotoxicity (decreased at 12 hours) and the general genotoxicity (increased at 24 hours). DNA damage ranking was the following (from the most to the least genotoxic): methacrylate-based > silicone-based = epoxy resin-based. CONCLUSIONS: The setting time had influence on the cytotoxicity of the epoxy resin-based sealer and genotoxicity of all tested sealers. The methacrylate-based sealer was the most cytotoxic, and the silicone-based sealer was not cytotoxic. Genotoxicity was observed for all sealers.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/química , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/química , Animais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Corantes , Ensaio Cometa/métodos , Resinas Compostas/química , Resinas Compostas/toxicidade , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Dano ao DNA , Cimentos Dentários/química , Cimentos Dentários/toxicidade , Resinas Epóxi/química , Resinas Epóxi/toxicidade , Fibroblastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Teste de Materiais , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/toxicidade , Sais de Tetrazólio , Tiazóis , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J Endod ; 38(4): 495-500, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22414836

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: MTA has good biological properties, and it is a mineralization-inducing material with different indications in endodontics. Initially this material was not recommended as root canal sealer. However, a resin sealer based on mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA Fillapex) was recently released with this indication. Because MTA is in contact with the periodontal tissues, bone, and pulp, it is important to know its cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of MTA canal sealer (Fillapex) compared with white MTA cement and AH Plus. METHODS: Chinese hamster fibroblasts (V79) were placed in contact with different dilutions of culture media previously exposed to such materials. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by methol-thiazol-diphenyl tetrazolium assay in spectrophotometer to check the viability rate and cell survival. The genotoxicity was accessed by the micronucleus formation assay. Cell survival rate and micronuclei number were assessed before and after exposure to cement extracts, and the results were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (P < .05). RESULTS: The results showed that the cell viability remained above 50% in white MTA group for all dilutions. AH Plus induced an intermediate cytotoxicity in a dilution-dependent manner, followed by Fillapex MTA. CONCLUSIONS: White MTA group was the less cytotoxic material in this study. Both AH Plus and Fillapex MTA sealer showed the lowest cell viability rates and caused an increased micronucleus formation when compared with control untreated group.


Assuntos
Compostos de Alumínio/toxicidade , Materiais Biocompatíveis/toxicidade , Compostos de Cálcio/toxicidade , Fibroblastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Óxidos/toxicidade , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/toxicidade , Silicatos/toxicidade , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Corantes , Cricetinae , Citotoxinas/toxicidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Resinas Epóxi/toxicidade , Teste de Materiais , Testes para Micronúcleos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Espectrofotometria , Sais de Tetrazólio , Tiazóis , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...