Flexural strength of dental adhesives with different photoinitiator systems.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the flexural strength of dental adhesives containing different combinations of photoinitiators systems. Material and Methods: The organic matrix of the experimental adhesives was created using a blend of monomers: 50% by weight bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA) and 50% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA). The photoinitiators utilized were camphorquinone (CQ) and phenylbis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (BAPO), with diphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPIHFP) and 2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) as co-initiators. These photoinitiators and co-initiators were integrated into the organic matrix at a concentration of 0.5% by mass, resulting in the formation of 6 groups (n=12): CQ/DMAEMA (control); CQ/DMAEMA/DPIHFP; BAPO; BAPO/DMAEMA; BAPO/DPIHFP and BAPO/DMAEMA/DPIHFP. Samples measuring 7 mm in length, 2 mm in width, and 1 mm in height were prepared and subjected to a three-point flexural test. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Results: Results indicated that groups incorporating BAPO and DPIHFP exhibited higher flexural strength compared to those with CQ and DMAEMA. The BAPO/DPIHFP group achieved the highest mean flexural strength values (p<0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that using adhesive systems with alternative photoinitiators and co-initiators can lead to superior flexural strength compared to conventional systems. Key words:Photoinitiators, Dentin-bonding agents, Light-curing.

The impact of chitosan in experimental resin with different photoinitiator systems.

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the effect of different concentrations of chitosan added to experimental resins containing either BAPO or camphorquinone (CQ) as photoinitiators, regarding degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), flexural elastic modulus (E), Knoop microhardness (KHN), cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antimicrobial activity. METHODS: Experimental resins with polymeric matrix of BisGMA and TEGDMA was added either 0.5 wt% BAPO or 0.5 wt% camphorquinone/0.2% amine along with and chitosan concentrations of 0.5%; 1.0% or 2.0%. Degree of conversion was measured using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Flexural strength and elastic modulus were obtained through three-point bending test and Knoop microhardness was measured in a microidenter. Direct cytotoxicity was performed in human keratinocytes and genotoxicity test was done in murine macrophages cells. Antimicrobial activity was acessed against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans through the inhibition halo. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey teste (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The materials containing photoinitiator BAPO showed higher values of DC, FS, E, and KHN compared to resins with CQ. The addition of chitosan did not affect the properties of these materials. However, in resins containing CQ, the addition of chitosan improve these properties compared to control group. For the groups containing BAPO the chitosan reduced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity compared to materials with camphorquinone. The materials with 1.0% and 2.0% chitosan showed increased antibacterial activity in the materials containing BAPO as photoinitiator for both bacteria. SIGNIFICANCE: The alternative photoinitiator BAPO and chitosan can improve physical and biological properties of photoactivated resins when compared with the materials with photoinitiator camphorquinone.

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current.

Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.

O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da direção da corrente elétrica na resistência da união resina composta-dentina usando três sistemas adesivos. Dentes molares humanos foram distribuídos de acordo com o sistema adesivo (dois passos autocondicionante - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; e um passo autocondicionante - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; e dois passos convencional - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), a direção da corrente elétrica (sem corrente elétrica - controle, correntes elétricas direta e reversa - 35µA) e tempo de armazenamento (24h - imediato e 6 meses). Blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) foram aderidos à dentina. Amostras de dentina-resina foram produzidas e armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC por 24 horas e 6 meses para o teste de resistência da união à microtração (µTBS) (n = 10; ~12 palitos por dente). Os padrões de fratura foram analisados ​​em estereomicroscópio e classificados em falhas coesiva na dentina, coesiva na resina, adesiva ou mista. A penetração do adesivo na dentina e a formação da camada híbrida foram avaliadas em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV). Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA três fatores seguidos pelo teste post hoc de Tukey (α = 0,05). Não houve diferenças na µTBS quando os sistemas adesivos foram aplicados sob as correntes elétricas direta e reversa, mas ambas as correntes elétricas aumentaram a µTBS para todos os sistemas adesivos. SBU apresentou os menores valores de µTBS para o grupo controle em ambos os tempos de armazenamento e para a corrente elétrica direta em 6 meses de armazenamento. Falhas adesivas foram mais frequente em todos os grupos. A corrente elétrica formou longos tags resinosos para todos os sistemas adesivos. O armazenamento por 6 meses não diminuiu significativamente os valores de µTBS. Ambos os sentidos da corrente elétrica (cargas positivas e negativas) a 35µA podem aumentar a µTBS dos sistemas adesivos testados à dentina.

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current

Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da direção da corrente elétrica na resistência da união resina composta-dentina usando três sistemas adesivos. Dentes molares humanos foram distribuídos de acordo com o sistema adesivo (dois passos autocondicionante - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; e um passo autocondicionante - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; e dois passos convencional - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), a direção da corrente elétrica (sem corrente elétrica - controle, correntes elétricas direta e reversa - 35µA) e tempo de armazenamento (24h - imediato e 6 meses). Blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) foram aderidos à dentina. Amostras de dentina-resina foram produzidas e armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC por 24 horas e 6 meses para o teste de resistência da união à microtração (µTBS) (n = 10; ~12 palitos por dente). Os padrões de fratura foram analisados ​​em estereomicroscópio e classificados em falhas coesiva na dentina, coesiva na resina, adesiva ou mista. A penetração do adesivo na dentina e a formação da camada híbrida foram avaliadas em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV). Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA três fatores seguidos pelo teste post hoc de Tukey (α = 0,05). Não houve diferenças na µTBS quando os sistemas adesivos foram aplicados sob as correntes elétricas direta e reversa, mas ambas as correntes elétricas aumentaram a µTBS para todos os sistemas adesivos. SBU apresentou os menores valores de µTBS para o grupo controle em ambos os tempos de armazenamento e para a corrente elétrica direta em 6 meses de armazenamento. Falhas adesivas foram mais frequente em todos os grupos. A corrente elétrica formou longos tags resinosos para todos os sistemas adesivos. O armazenamento por 6 meses não diminuiu significativamente os valores de µTBS. Ambos os sentidos da corrente elétrica (cargas positivas e negativas) a 35µA podem aumentar a µTBS dos sistemas adesivos testados à dentina.

Abstract Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.

Stress distribution in restorations with glass fiber and polyetheretherketone intraradicular posts: An in silico analysis.

This study evaluated stresses generated at maxillary central incisor (21) root restored with lithium disilicate crown (LDC), and glass fiber (GFP) or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) post. 3D models created by computed tomographic image (i-CAT Cone Beam 3D Dental Imaging System) reproduced maxillary central incisor. Each model had prosthetic LDCs (2.0 mm thick) cemented to GFP or PEEK posts with dual resin cement. Different loads were applied to each model (cervical, incisal, axial, middle). At maximum principal stress, PEEK showed higher stress than GFP in all loads, but with qualitative similarity. At minimum principal stress, PEEK and GFP showed qualitative and quantitative similarities, except axial load. Maxillary central incisor restored with GFP or PEEK and LDC presented, in general, similar stress intensity and distribution for main occlusal loads. Only two of sixteen occlusal loads tested (cervical for maximum principal; axial for minimum principal) showed significant quantitative difference.

Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Anterior Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Zirconia Implants with and without Cantilever.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate using finite element analysis (FEA), the stress distribution in prostheses (lithium disilicate crowns) on monotype zirconia implants with and without cantilever in the anterior region of the maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a virtual reconstruction of bone model of the toothed maxilla from a computed tomography, three models (groups) were created: Zr (11-21)-implants placed in the area of 11 and 21 with cantilever; Zr (12-22)-implants placed in the area of 12 and 22 without cantilever; and Zr (11-22)-implants intercalated placed in the area of 11 and 22. In all models, monotype zirconia implant (4.1 × 12.0 mm) was used in single-body configuration. Lithium disilicate crowns were designed on the implants and pontics for all groups. A 150-N load was applied to the prostheses. The materials used were considered isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. FEA was performed to evaluate the maximum (tensile) and minimum (compressive) principal stresses in the implant, crowns, and bone tissue. Data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. RESULTS: For all groups, the highest maximum principal stress occurred in the palatal cervical area of the implant, with the high values for the Zr (12-22) group and the low values for the Zr (11-21) group. The maximum principal stress was concentrated in the cervical palatal area of the crown, with the Zr (11-21) group presented the highest values and the Zr (12-22) group showed the lowest values. In the bone tissue all the groups presented similar values of maximum and minimal principal stress, with the palatal (maximum principal) and vestibular (minimum principal) close to the cervical of the implants the area with the highest concentration of stresses. CONCLUSIONS: The position of monotype zirconia implant did not interfere in the bone tissue stress, and the implants placed in the 11-21 present lower stress in implants and higher in the crown. The cantilever does not increase the stress in the implants, crown, and bone tissue.

Influence of the Multiple Layers Application and the Heating of Silane on the Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Ceramics and Resinous Cement.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramic and resinous cement when silane (Prosil, FGM) was applied in different amounts of layers under heating or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty IPS E-max CAD ceramic (Ivoclar) was used. They were conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds. The samples were distributed in six groups (n = 10): 1Sil, 1 layer of silane without heating; 1SilAq, 1 layer of silane with heating; 2Sil, 2 layers without heating; 2SilAq, 2 layers with heating; 3Sil, 3 layers without heating; and 3SilAq, 3 layers with heating. After each layer, a jet of cold air was applied for 20 seconds in groups 1Sil, 2Sil, 3Sil, and jet of hot air (50°C) in groups 1SilAq, 2SilAq, and 3SilAq. Subsequently, an adhesive layer was applied, and fourcylinders were made on the ceramic with a resin cement AllCemVeneer and photoactivated for 20 seconds. The samples were stored at 37°C for 24 hours and analyzed to the microshear test at EMIC. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that there was no statistical interaction between the factors studied. The "heating" factor was not statistically significant; however, the "silane layers" factor showed differences between groups. The analysis of the results showed that the use of one (66%) or two layers (67%) of silane regardless of heating, produced higher values of bond strength, when compared with the group of three layers (62%). CONCLUSION: The use of silane with one or two layers provided a greater bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramic and resinous cement and that the heating did not influence the results.