Development of anti-human leukocyte antigen class 1 antibodies following allogeneic islet cell transplantation.

Currently there is minimal concern that islet allograft failure could result from the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies reactive to the allograft. We report here a case of islet allograft failure where the recipient developed immunoglobulin G anti-HLA class I antibodies reactive to HLA antigens present in two of the three islet cell donors. The patient had no detectable anti-HLA antibodies prior to the transplant but these antibodies were detected approximately 4 months posttransplant. Of concern, these antibodies developed despite induction with anti-IL2R antibodies (Zenapex) prior to intraportal islet cell infusion, low-dose tacrolimus (12-hour troughs 3 to 5 ng/mL) and rapammune (target troughs 12 to 15 ng/mL). The patient was not presensitized with blood products or a previous allograft. Her husband, however, shared antigens present in one of the islet donors and the recipient could have been presensitized to her husband during her two pregnancies. This case clearly demonstrates that islet allografts can lead to development of anti-HLA antibodies, which can cause islet allograft failure, as is the case with solid organ transplants, and hence emphasizes the need to monitor for such antibodies pre- and posttransplant. Additionally it appears that currently recommended immunosuppression may not be sufficient to inhibit a humoral response to both alloantigens and autoantigens.

Preliminary risk-benefit assessment of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant rejection.

Mycophenolate mofetil (the morpholinoethyl ester of mycophenolic acid) inhibits de novo purine synthesis via the inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. Its selective lymphocyte antiproliferative effects involve both T and B cells, preventing antibody formation. Mycophenolate mofetil has immuno-suppressive effects alone, but is used most commonly in combination with other immunosuppressants. Mycophenolate mofetil, in combination with cyclosporin and corticosteroids, has been studied in large, randomised clinical trials involving nearly 1500 renal allograft transplant recipients. These trials demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil is significantly more effective in reducing treatment failure and acute rejection episodes than placebo or azathioprine. Additionally, mycophenolate mofetil may be able to reduce the occurrence of chronic rejection. Mycophenolate mofetil is relatively well tolerated. The most common adverse effect reported is gastrointestinal intolerance; haematological aberrations have also been noted. The reversible cytostatic action of mycophenolate mofetil allows for dose adjustment or discontinuation, preventing serious toxicity or an overly suppressed immune system. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease and the development of malignancies are concerns that merit evaluation in long term follow-up studies. Mycophenolate mofetil does not cause the adverse effects typically associated with other commercially available immunosuppressant medications such as nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, hypertension, nervous system disturbances, electrolyte abnormalities, skin disorders, hyperglycaemia, hyperuricaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, lipid disorders and structural bone loss. Based on preliminary information, a positive benefit-risk ratio has been demonstrated with the use of mycophenolate mofetil in the prophylaxis of rejection in cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. Data from studies in other types of organ transplants are promising, but are too limited to draw clear conclusions. Long term follow-up studies are required to confirm these observations. Although mycophenolate mofetil is expensive, the beneficial effects on the reduction of rejection, treatment failure and related expenses suggest that it is most likely to be cost effective.

Clustering of adverse drug events: analysis of risk factors for cerebellar toxicity with high-dose cytarabine.

BACKGROUND: Cerebellar toxicity is a severe, therapy-limiting adverse reaction of cytarabine given in high doses. The Food and Drug Administration received a report of an increased frequency of cerebellar toxicity at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics after a switch from the product (Cytosar-U) manufactured by The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich., to the generic form made by Quad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of cerebellar toxicity in Quad-treated patients with Upjohn-treated patients, a record-based cohort study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics between January 1986 and August 1989. METHODS: The incidence of cerebellar toxicity was studied in 63 leukemia patients according to the manufacturer of the product received (34 Upjohn only, 25 Quad only, and four both manufacturers). The relative risk of cerebellar toxicity was adjusted for other known risk factors. RESULTS: Patients in the manufacturer-defined treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, type of leukemia, disease stage, calculated creatinine clearance, presence of abnormal liver function tests, or total dose received. The crude relative risk of cerebellar toxicity comparing the Quad product with the Upjohn product was 5.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-13.7). Adjustment for potential confounders did not alter the association. Other risk factors for cerebellar toxicity, independent of manufacturer, were age greater than 50 years, type of leukemia, disease stage, total dose greater than or equal to 20 g/m2, abnormal pretreatment liver function, and reduced creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: This study found a significantly higher incidence of cerebellar toxicity with high-dose cytarabine manufactured by Quad Pharmaceuticals when compared with the incidence of cerebellar toxicity with the Upjohn product. Further research at independent institutions would be necessary to allow generalization of this finding. In addition, our findings suggest that a dose reduction in high-dose cytarabine therapy may be indicated for patients with reduced glomerular filtration rates.