Influence of canonical structure determining residues on antibody affinity and stability.

A number of light and heavy chain canonical residue core redesigns were made in a therapeutic antibody (AQC2, anti-VLA1) Fab to explore the consequences to binding affinity and stability. These positions are all loop supporting, primarily CDR1 residues which do not directly contact the antigen. Structure based methods were used with and without consensus sequence information. 30 constructs were made, 24 expressed, and 70% of the designs using consensus sequence information retained binding affinity. Some success maintaining stability with more extreme redesigns suggests a surprising tolerance to mutation, though it often comes at the cost of loss of binding affinity and presumed loop conformation changes. In concordance with the expected need to present an ordered surface for binding, a relationship between decreased affinity and decreased stability was observed. Overpacking the core tends to destabilize the molecule and should be avoided.

An antibody loop replacement design feasibility study and a loop-swapped dimer structure.

A design approach was taken to investigate the feasibility of replacing single complementarity determining region (CDR) antibody loops. This approach may complement simpler mutation-based strategies for rational antibody design by expanding conformation space. Enormous crystal structure diversity is available, making CDR loops logical targets for structure-based design. A detailed analysis for the L1 loop shows that each loop length takes a distinct conformation, thereby allowing control on a length scale beyond that accessible to simple mutations. The L1 loop in the anti-VLA1 antibody was replaced with the L2 loop residues longer in an attempt to add an additional hydrogen bond and fill space on the antibody-antigen interface. The designs expressed well, but failed to improve affinity. In an effort to learn more, one design was crystallized and data were collected at 1.9 A resolution. The designed L1 loop takes the qualitatively desired conformation; confirming that loop replacement by design is feasible. The crystal structure also shows that the outermost loop (residues Leu51-Ser68) is domain swapped with another monomer. Tryptophan fluorescence measurements were used to monitor unfolding as a function of temperature and indicate that the loop involved in domain swapping does not unfold below 60 degrees C. The domain-swapping is not directly responsible for the affinity loss, but is likely a side-effect of the structural instability which may contribute to affinity loss. A second round of design was successful in eliminating the dimerization through mutation of a residue (Leu51Ser) at the joint of the domain-swapped loop.