Impact of Inpatient Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Prescription Rates in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Despite large, randomized controlled trials and guideline recommendations, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) continue to receive suboptimal guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT). This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of inpatient initiation of sodium-glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on postdischarge prescribing rates and the downstream impact on clinical outcomes. The INitiation of SGlt2i in Hospital for HFrEF (INSIGHT-HF) study was a retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients older than 18 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% conducted from July 2020 and July 2021. Our primary outcome was SGLT2i prescription rates at 30 days. Among 2,663 eligible patients with documented HFrEF, 177 (6.6%) had SGLT2i initiated during their index hospitalization. The rate of SGLT2i prescriptions at 30 days was significantly higher in those with inpatient initiation of SGLT2i compared with those who did not start while inpatient (96% vs 14.7%, p <0.0001). The heart failure readmission rate in the first 30 days was significantly lower in those with inpatient initiation of SGLT2i compared with those who did not start during hospitalization. (9.3% vs 22.7%, p = 0.04). Cardiovascular mortality was numerically, but not significantly, different between groups (4% vs 10.7%, p = 0.21). Inpatient initiation of an SGLT2i was associated with a significantly higher postdischarge rate of SGLT2i prescriptions and significantly lower heart failure readmission rates at 30 days. In conclusion, these findings highlight the importance of initiating SGLT2i during inpatient hospitalization to improve the quality of care in patients with HFrEF.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse hematologic drug reaction that results in thrombocytopenia. This potentially life-threatening event is due to the administration of heparin products, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The incidence of HIT occurs in <0.1%-7% of hospitalized patients treated with heparin products, with a risk of thrombosis as high as 50%. In 2018, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) recommended the utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in clinically stable patients at average bleeding risk with HIT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prescribing patterns of rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed HIT. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review from January 2013 through October 2019 at the University of Chicago Medicine. Twelve patients were identified to have received a DOAC for suspected or confirmed HIT. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was utilized in seven (58%) patients, six of whom received argatroban prior to starting rivaroxaban. Five (71%) of these patients were started on the recommended dose of rivaroxaban for VTE. Apixaban was utilized in five (42%) patients; four patients were started on argatroban and transitioned to apixaban. One patient was started on the suggested dose of apixaban for VTE. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: After starting DOACs for suspected HIT, no patients had new thrombosis during hospitalization. Eight patients (67%) followed up at our institution within 6 months of their discharge date. No subsequent thrombi formation were identified for any of these patients. The results of this study add to the expanding literature regarding the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in HIT, and indicate DOACs are being increasingly utilized for the treatment of confirmed or suspected HIT.

Impact of a Nurse-Driven Heparin Monitoring Protocol for Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices require anticoagulation to reduce thrombosis risk. Nurse-driven unfractionated heparin monitoring protocols have been validated for various indications, although data in patients with ventricular assist devices are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a nurse-driven protocol for managing unfractionated heparin therapy in stable patients with ventricular assist devices. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with ventricular assist devices requiring unfractionated heparin therapy, divided into 2 groups: before and after protocol implementation. The primary outcome was time to first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time. RESULTS: Each group included 29 patients. There was no difference between the preintervention and postintervention groups in time to therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (25 vs 23 hours, P = .95) or proportion of patients with therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time within the first 24 hours (45% vs 34%, P = .42). Suspected pump thrombosis and bleeding events were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A nurse-driven heparin monitoring protocol was similar in time to therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time compared with provider-driven monitoring and adjustments in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Impact of plasma volume status on mortality following left ventricular assist device implantation.

Worsening systemic congestion is often the central trigger of hospitalization in patients with heart failure. However, accurate assessment of congestion is challenging. The prognostic impact of systemic congestion following durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unknown. Consecutive patients who received durable continuous-flow LVAD implantation between January 2014 and June 2017 and were followed for 1 year were included. The association of preoperative plasma volume status, which was calculated using patients' body weight and hematocrit and expressed as a deviation from ideal plasma volume, with 1-year mortality following LVAD implantation was investigated. In total, 186 patients (median 57 years and 138 males) were included. Baseline plasma volume status was -30.1% (-37.1%, -19.4%) on median. Eighty-eight patients (47%) had higher plasma volume status (>-29.8%), and their 1-year survival was significantly lower than those without (67% vs. 87%, P = .001). High plasma volume status was an independent predictor of 1-year death with an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.52 (95% confidence interval 1.52-13.5). Baseline systemic congestion, as defined by the high plasma volume status, was associated with higher mortality following durable continuous-flow LVAD implantation. The implication of improving preoperative plasma volume remains an area of needed investigation.

Perioperative improvement in serum albumin level in patients with left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: The negative impact of baseline hypoalbuminemia on clinical outcome following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is well known. However, the implications of perioperative change in serum albumin levels on post-LVAD outcomes remain uninvestigated. METHODS: Among consecutive patients with baseline serum albumin <3.5 g/dl who received durable LVAD implantation between April 2014 and August 2017 and were followed for 1 year, the impact of perioperative change in serum albumin level from baseline to 3 months post-LVAD on the incidence of adverse events was investigated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (median 60 years and 69% male) were included. Serum albumin change was an independent predictor of the occurrence of adverse events with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.78) and a cutoff change of 0.7 g/dl. Those with albumin increase >0.7 g/dl had higher 1-year freedom from adverse events (45% vs. 14%, p = .008), dominantly due to lower incidence of death or sepsis compared with those without (p < .05 for both). CONCLUSION: Among those with baseline hypoalbuminemia, a considerable perioperative increase in serum albumin levels following LVAD implantation was associated with lower mortality and morbidity. The implication of aggressive nutrition intervention on LVAD patients is the next concern.

COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and solutions from the cardiology pharmacist's perspective.

The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) challenges pharmacists worldwide. Alongside other specialized pharmacists, we re-evaluated daily processes and therapies used to treat COVID-19 patients within our institutions from a cardiovascular perspective and share what we have learned. To develop a collaborative approach for cardiology issues and concerns in the care of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients by drawing on the experiences of cardiology pharmacists across the country. On March 26, 2020, a conference call was convened composed of 24 cardiology residency-trained pharmacists (23 actively practicing in cardiology and 1 in critical care) from 16 institutions across the United States to discuss cardiology issues each have encountered with COVID-19 patients. Discussion centered around providing optimal pharmaceutical care while limiting staff exposure. The collaborative of pharmacists found for the ST-elevation myocardial infarction patient, many institutions were diverting COVID-19 rule-out patients to their Emergency Department (ED). Thrombolytics are an alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) allowing for timely treatment of patients and decreased staff exposure. An emergency response grab and go kit includes initial drugs and airway equipment so the patient can be treated and the cart can be left outside the room. Cardiology pharmacists have developed policies and procedures to address monitoring of QT prolonging medications, the use of inhaled prostacyclins, and national drug shortages. Technology has allowed us to practice social distancing, while staying in close contact with our teams, patients, and colleagues and continuing to teach. Residents are engaged in unique decision-making processes with their preceptors and assist as pharmacist extenders. Cardiology pharmacists are in a unique position to work with other pharmacists and health care professionals to implement safe and effective practice changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments are necessary in rapidly changing times.

Opioid Use and Morbidities during Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

The use of opioids during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is increasing, but the implication remains unknown. We investigated the association between the use of opioid and morbidities during LVAD supports. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who received LVAD between 2014 and 2017, which were stratified by the use of opioid at post-LVAD 3 months. Among 136 patients, 77 (57%) were in the opioid group. Hemoglobin and albumin were lower, and C-reactive protein was higher at baseline and 3 months later in the opioid group (P < 0.05 for all). The opioid group displayed worse hemodynamics, with higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure (P < 0.05 for both). Furthermore, the opioid group had higher incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding (31% versus 17%, P = 0.043) and sepsis (30% versus 13%, P = 0.036) during the 1 year observational period, whereas survivals were not stratified by the use of opioid (83% versus 90%, P = 0.27). Opioid use was associated with morbidities accompanied by poor hemodynamics during LVAD supports. The detailed causality of opioid use on morbidities remains a future concern.

Successful Reversal of Bradycardia and Dyspnea With Aminophylline After Ticagrelor Load.

A 69-year-old male underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention requiring placement of a drug-eluting stent to the first obtuse marginal artery. Four hours following the administration of a ticagrelor loading dose, he developed dyspnea and sinus pauses. Aminophylline was administered and resulted in immediate and sustained symptom resolution. Ticagrelor has been associated with dyspnea and bradyarrhythmias, both attributed to increased adenosine exposure. Ticagrelor inhibits reuptake of intracellular adenosine. Adenosine antagonists aminophylline and theophylline have been utilized to reverse the effects of adenosine and may relieve adenosine-mediated adverse effects induced by ticagrelor therapy. Aminophylline may be considered for reversal of dyspnea and bradyarrhythmia associated with ticagrelor therapy through alterations in adenosine exposure.