Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 28(10): 753-60, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21698554

RESUMO

We sought to determine preventability for cases of obstetric hemorrhage, identify preventable factors, and compare differences between levels of hospital. We retrospectively reviewed a 1-year cohort of severe and near-miss obstetric hemorrhage in an urban perinatal network. An expert panel, using a validated preventability model, reviewed all cases. Preventability and distribution of preventability factors were compared between levels of hospital care. Sixty-three severe and near-miss obstetric hemorrhage cases were identified from 11 hospitals; 54% were deemed potentially preventable. Overall preventability was not statistically different by level of hospital, and 88% were provider related. The only treatment-related preventability factors were significantly different between levels of hospital and significantly less common in level III hospitals (p < 0.01). The majority of obstetric hemorrhage was preventable. The most common potentially preventable factor was provider treatment error, and this was significantly more common in level II hospitals. New interventions should be focused on decreasing providers' treatment errors.


Assuntos
Hospitais/classificação , Hospitais/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Transfusão de Sangue , Cuidados Críticos , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Erros Médicos , Segurança do Paciente , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 191(3): 939-44, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15467568

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine whether sociodemographic, clinical, and other service-related factors, as well as preventability issues affect a woman's progression along the continuum of morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study of pregnancy-related deaths, women with near-miss morbidity, and those with other severe, but not life threatening, morbidity. Factors associated with maternal outcome were examined. RESULTS: Provider factors (related to preventability) and clinical diagnosis were significantly associated with progression along the continuum after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (P < .01 for both associations). CONCLUSION: In order to improve mortality rates, we must understand maternal morbidity and how it may lead to death. This study shows that important initiatives include addressing preventability, in particular, provider factors, which may play a role in moving women along the continuum of morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Materna , Morbidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Estado Civil , Razão de Chances , Paridade , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Grupos Raciais , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Uterina/mortalidade
3.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 57(7): 716-20, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15358399

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system for identifying women with near-miss maternal morbidity, and differentiating these women from those with severe but not life-threatening conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago (UIMC), which is a tertiary care hospital with approximately 2,220 births per year. UIMC is in a major urban area serving a predominantly African-American and Latina population. This article focuses on five clinical factors: organ failure (>/=1 system), extended intubation (>12 hr), ICU admission, surgical intervention, and transfusion (>3 units), grouped into several scoring system alternatives. The total score on each scoring system was calculated as the weighted sum of the clinical factors present for each woman. RESULTS: The five-factor scoring system had the highest specificity (93.9%), but the four-factor scoring system, which eliminated organ system failure for simplification of data collection, still had a specificity of 78.1%. CONCLUSION: Near-miss morbidities identified using the scoring systems presented can be incorporated into clinical case review and epidemiologic studies to enhance the monitoring of obstetric care and to improve estimates of the incidence of life-threatening complications in pregnancy.


Assuntos
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Materna , Morbidade , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA