Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Analysis Comparing Single Column, Locked Anterior Plating to Crossed Lag Screw Technique.

Ankle arthrodesis is performed to eliminate pain due to end-stage osteoarthritis, regardless of etiology. This procedure remains the reference standard treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, despite recent advancements in total ankle replacement. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiographic and clinical fusion rates and time to bony fusion for patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using an anterior approach with a single column locked plate construct versus crossed lag screws. We identified 358 patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis from January 2003 to June 2013. Of the 358 patients, 83 (23.2%) met the inclusion criteria for the present study. Of the 83 included patients, 47 received locked anterior (or anterolateral) plate fixation, and 36 received crossed lag screw constructs. The overall nonunion rate was 6.0% (n = 5), with 1 nonunion in the anterior plate group (2.1%) and 4 nonunions in the crossed lag screw group (11.1%; p = .217). No differences were identified between the 2 groups for normal talocrural angle [χ2 (1) = 0.527; p = .468], normal tibial axis/talar ratio [χ2 (1) = 0.004; p = .952], and lateral dorsiflexion angle (p = .565). Based on our findings in similar demographic groups, ankle arthrodesis using locked anterior plate fixation is a safe technique with similar complication rates and radiographic outcomes to those of crossed lag screws.

Arthroscopic Evaluation of Syndesmotic Instability and Malreduction.

Ankle fractures are a common injury treated by orthopaedic surgeons. The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis can be injured during these fractures as well as in isolation. They pose a significant challenge with regard to the diagnosis of instability as well as evaluating reduction after fixation. Multiple studies have demonstrated that traditional radiographic analysis fails to accurately identify syndesmotic diastasis, instability, or malreduction. Ankle arthroscopy has been proposed as an alternative way to evaluate the syndesmosis. Ten transtibial amputation cadavers were utilized for this study. Two distinct analyses were undertaken. The first, analysis of instability, utilized 2 dissection groups, a superficial dissection only and a partial disruption instability model. The second analysis was of syndesmotic malreduction. For this, all 10 specimens underwent complete disruption of the syndesmosis and subsequent fixation in either anatomic alignment or malreduction. Both analyses were performed by surgeons blinded to the condition of the syndesmosis. Two groups of surgeons were able to identify syndesmotic instability a combined 75% of the time. Malreduction diagnosis was mixed with a 100% accurate diagnosis of sagittal plane displacement but only 50% accuracy for rotation and 17% for an anatomic reduction. Syndesmotic injury during ankle fracture presents a significant problem to the treating surgeon. Ankle arthroscopy has been shown in the literature to be highly sensitive for diagnosing instability but has not been evaluated in diagnosing malreduction. The current study shows moderate success in diagnosing both malreduction and instability. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level V: Basic Science.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Nails: A Comparison of Nails With and Without Internal Compression.

BACKGROUND: Hindfoot arthrodesis with tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) intramedullary nails is used commonly when treating ankle and subtalar arthritis and other hindfoot pathology. Adequate compression is paramount to avoid nonunion and fatigue fracture of the hardware. Arthrodesis systems with internal compression have demonstrated superior compression to systems relying on external methods. This study examined the speed of union with TTC fusion nails with internal compression over nails without internal compression. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed identifying nail type and time to union of the subtalar joint (STJ) and tibiotalar joint (TTJ). A total of 198 patients were included from 2003 to 2011. RESULTS: The median time to STJ fusion without internal compression was 104 days compared to 92 days with internal compression (P = .044). The median time to TTJ fusion without internal compression was 111 days compared to 93 days with internal compression (P = .010). Adjusting for diabetes, there was no significant difference in fusion speed with or without internal compression for the STJ (P = .561) or TTJ (P = .358). Nonunion rates were 24.5% for the STJ and 17.0% for the TTJ with internal compression, and 43.4% for the STJ and 42.1% for the TTJ without internal compression. This difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for diabetes for the TTJ (P = .001) but not for the STJ (P = .194). CONCLUSION: The intramedullary hindfoot arthrodesis nail was a viable treatment option in degenerative joint disease of the TTC joint. There appeared to be an advantage using systems with internal compression; however, there was no statistically significant difference after controlling for diabetes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Arthroscopic Evaluation of Syndesmotic Instability in a Cadaveric Model.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures are among the most common lower extremity injuries. Proper care requires evaluation for syndesmotic ligament disruption. Ankle arthroscopy has been proposed as an intraoperative tool that can evaluate stability. Our focus was to evaluate the amount of displacement produced in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes visualized through ankle arthroscopy in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Seven below-knee specimens were mounted in a traction tower. Four groups were evaluated: no ligamentous disruption; anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and interosseous ligament disruption; above plus anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament disruption; and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and transverse ligament disruption. Force was applied and measured using a digital scale. The amount of displacement of the fibula in relation to the center of the incisura was measured under arthroscopic evaluation using a calibrated probe. RESULTS: An intact syndesmosis and lateral ankle ligaments provided multiplanar stability. In group 2, syndesmosis diastasis was appreciated in the transverse-external rotation plane with as little as 6 lb of force. In group 3, a greater amount of displacement was appreciated with less force. Multiplane instability was visible in every specimen with as little as 2 lb of force. Group 4 specimens were completely disrupted and so grossly unstable that testing was impossible. CONCLUSION: Ankle arthroscopy has the potential to evaluate even partial disruption of the syndesmotic ligament complex. Instability in the sagittal and transverse planes was encountered early in the spectrum of disruption. Traditional evaluation methods have poor sensitivity for instability in these planes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Arthroscopic evaluation of subtle displacement in multiple planes may assist the surgeon in understanding the extent of the syndesmotic injury. Further studies are necessary to determine to what extent instability requires fixation as well as the role for arthroscopy in assessing anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis after fixation is performed.

Comparing fixation used for calcaneal displacement osteotomies: a look at removal rates and cost.

BACKGROUND: The calcaneal displacement osteotomy is a procedure frequently used by foot and ankle surgeons for hindfoot angular deformity. Traditional techniques use compression screw fixation that can result in prominent hardware. While the results of the procedure are generally good, a common concern is the development of plantar heel pain related to prominent hardware. The primary purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare clinical outcomes of 2 fixation methods for the osteotomy. Secondarily a cost analysis will compare implant costs to hardware removal costs. METHODS: Records were reviewed for patients who had undergone a calcaneal displacement osteotomy fixated with either lag screw or a locked lateral compression plate (LLCP). Neuropathy, previous ipsilateral calcaneus surgery, heel pad trauma, or incomplete radiographic follow-up were exclusionary. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (19.4%) required hardware removal from the screw fixation group compared to 1 (1.6%) of the LLCP group, which is significant (P < .05). Time to radiographic healing was not significantly different (P = .87). The screw fixation group required more follow-up visits over a longer period of time (P < .05). Implant cost was remarkably different with screw fixation costing on average $247.12, compared to the LLCP costing $1175.59. Although the LLCP cost was significantly higher, cost savings were identified when the cost of removal and removal rates were included. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that this device provides adequate stabilization for healing in equivalent time to screw fixation. The LLCP required decreased rates of hardware removal with fewer postoperative visits over a shorter period of time. Significant savings were demonstrated in the LLCP group despite the higher implant cost. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.