Cutaneous extramedullary hemopoiesis in chronic myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders.

Cutaneous extramedullary hemopoiesis (EMH) is a rare complication of chronic myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders. Chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF) is the most common underlying condition. To date, fewer than 30 cases have been reported in the literature and there has been significant confusion with regard to the proposed pathogenesis. In this article, we describe two additional cases of cutaneous EMH associated with chronic myeloid diseases and review the literature with the aim of clarifying the underlying pathogenesis of this unusual clinical condition. The diagnosis of cutaneous EMH in both patients with chronic myeloid diseases was made histopathologically, with immunohistochemistry confirming the presence of differentiating hemopoietic cells associated with dermal components. Cutaneous EMH in chronic myeloid diseases occurs as a result of migration of abnormal neoplastic hemopoietic precursor cells into the skin (in effect, metastasis) and subsequent differentiation along divergent myeloid cell lineages. The diagnosis should be considered in any patient with chronic myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic disease who develops a skin rash.

Comparison of five antimicrobial regimens for treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory facial acne vulgaris in the community: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of five antimicrobial regimens for mild to moderate facial acne and whether propionibacterial antibiotic resistance affects treatment response. METHODS: In this randomised, observer-masked trial, 649 community participants were allocated one of five antibacterial regimens. Primary outcomes were patients' self-assessed improvement and reduction in inflamed lesions at 18 weeks. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Moderate or greater improvement at 18 weeks was reported in 72 (55%) of 131 participants assigned oral oxytetracycline plus topical placebo, 70 (54%) of 130 assigned oral minocycline plus topical placebo, 78 (60%) of 130 assigned topical benzoyl peroxide plus oral placebo, 84 (66%) of 127 assigned topical erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide in a combined formulation plus oral placebo, and 82 (63%) of 131 assigned topical erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide separately plus oral placebo. Most improvement occurred in the first 6 weeks. Treatment differences for the proportion of people with at least moderate improvement were: minocycline versus oxytetracycline -1.2% (unadjusted 95% CI -13.3 to 10.9); combined erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide versus oxytetracycline 11.1% (-0.7 to 22.9) and versus minocycline 12.3% (0.4 to 24.2); erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide separately versus combined formulation -3.5% (-15.2 to 8.2); benzoyl peroxide versus oxytetracycline 5.0% (-7.0 to 17.0), versus minocycline 6.2% (-5.8 to 18.2), and versus combined formulation -6.1% (-17.9 to 5.7). Benzoyl peroxide was the most cost-effective treatment. Efficacy of both tetracyclines was reduced by pre-existing tetracycline resistance. INTERPRETATION: Topical benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide/erythromycin combinations are similar in efficacy to oral oxytetracycline and minocycline and are not affected by propionibacterial antibiotic resistance.