Comparison of equipment management and cleaning protocols for rigid sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND: To provide outcome data relating to cleaning of rigid sigmoidoscopy equipment comparing commonly used techniques, allowing a framework for general guidelines for use in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 104 rigid sigmoidoscopies were performed in the rooms of two colorectal surgeons using standard techniques. A three-way randomization was performed adopting the following variables: enzymatic washing versus steam sterilization of the light head, disposable versus reusable bellows and use with versus without an air filter. Aerosol from each system was collected on agar plates, and review of colony count numbers was performed. RESULTS: Gross faecal contamination of the rigid sigmoidoscope light head did not occur during any of the procedures. One plate grew a single-gram negative colony; all other contaminated plates showed environmental flora only. Reusable bellows in combination with an air filter showed lower mean colony counts (environmental flora) from the pre-procedure cultures as well as from the bellows' cultures. CONCLUSION: Enteric flora in this study was rarely aerosolized, and the use of an air filter may decrease this likelihood even further. There is no advantage in using disposable insufflation bellows when compared with the reusable type, allowing considerable cost saving. Washing the light head between procedures with enzymatic solution is a safe cheap and effective method of decontamination.

Continuous wound infusion of local anesthetic for the control of pain after elective abdominal colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Local anesthetic wound infusion has been investigated in recent years as a potential alternative to standard analgesic regimens after major surgery. This study investigates the efficacy of a continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine in conjunction with best practice postoperative analgesia after midline laparotomy for abdominal colorectal surgery. METHODS: We performed a randomized, participant and outcome assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled trial on patients presenting for major abdominal colorectal surgery at our institution between December 2003 and February 2006. Patients were allocated to receive ropivacaine 0.54 percent or normal saline via a dual catheter Painbuster Soaker (I-Flow Corporation, OH, USA) continuous infusion device into their midline laparotomy wound for 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included in this study. The continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine after abdominal colorectal surgery conveys minimal benefit compared with saline wound infusion. No statistically significant difference could be shown for: pain at rest, morphine usage, length of stay, mobility, nausea, or return of bowel function. There was a small, statistically significant difference in mean pain on movement on Day 1 for the ropivacaine group (adjusted mean difference -0.6 (range, -1.08 to -0.13)). Although this trend continued on Days 2 and 3, the differences between groups were no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Management of pain after major abdominal colorectal surgery is best achieved through adopting a multimodal approach to analgesia. Delivery of ropivacaine to midline laparotomy wounds via a Painbuster Soaker device is safe, but we have not demonstrated any significant clinical advantage over current best practice.