Risk Factors, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Osteoporosis in HIV-Infected Adults in an HIV Primary Care Clinic.

Background: The population of people living with HIV is aging, and with aging come emergent comorbidities, including osteoporosis, for which screening and treatment are becoming increasingly important. Osteoporosis prevalence among those living with HIV is 3 times greater than among HIV-uninfected controls. Objective: To assess and describe osteoporosis risk factors, screening, diagnosis, and treatment for people 50 years of age or older living with HIV and receiving care at a multidisciplinary HIV primary care clinic. Methods: A retrospective chart review of people 50 years of age or older living with HIV was conducted at the John Ruedy Clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia, between June 1, 2016, and June 1, 2019. Patients who had had fewer than 2 yearly follow-up appointments were excluded. Results: A total of 146 patients were included in the analysis; most were male (n = 134, 92%), and the median age was 55 years. Patients had a median of 3 osteoporosis risk factors (in addition to age and HIV infection), and 145 patients had at least 1 risk factor. All screening for osteoporosis was conducted by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Thirty-nine (27%) of the patients were screened with DXA, 92 (63%) were not screened, and 15 (10%) already had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. The DXA screening identified osteoporosis in an additional 10 patients and osteopenia in 22 patients. Treatments for patients with osteoporosis included bisphosphonates (n = 15, 60%) and vitamin D or calcium (or both), without any other medications (n = 4, 16%). In the overall study population, 32 (22%) of the patients were taking calcium and 46 (32%) were taking vitamin D. Conclusions: Many patients aged 50 years or older and receiving HIV care at the John Ruedy Clinic had or were at risk for osteoporosis. An opportunity exists to increase screening and treatment of these individuals. A multidisciplinary team may be crucial in achieving this goal.

Contexte: La population des personnes vivant avec le VIH vieillit et, avec le vieillissement, des comorbidités émergent, dont l'ostéoporose, pour laquelle le dépistage et le traitement sont de plus en plus importants. La prévalence de l'ostéoporose chez les personnes vivant avec le VIH est 3 fois plus élevée que chez les témoins non infectés. Objectif: Évaluer et décrire les facteurs de risque, le dépistage, le diagnostic et le traitement de l'ostéoporose chez les personnes d'au moins 50 ans vivant avec le VIH et qui reçoivent des soins dans une clinique pluridisciplinaire de soins primaires pour le VIH. Méthodes: Un examen rétrospectif des dossiers des personnes d'au moins 50 ans vivant avec le VIH a été effectué à la clinique John Ruedy à Vancouver (Colombie-Britannique) entre le 1er juin 2016 et le 1er juin 2019. Les patients qui avaient eu moins de 2 rendez-vous de suivi annuels ont été exclus de l'étude. Résultats: Au total, 146 patients ont été inclus dans l'analyse; la plupart étaient des hommes (n = 134, 92 %) et l'âge médian était de 55 ans. Les patients avaient une médiane de 3 facteurs de risque d'ostéoporose (en plus de l'âge et de l'infection par le VIH), et 145 patients avaient au moins 1 facteur de risque. Tous les dépistages de l'ostéoporose ont été réalisés par absorption biphotonique à rayons X (DXA). Trente-neuf patients (27 %) ont été dépistés par DXA, 92 (63 %) ne l'ont pas été et 15 (10 %) avaient déjà un diagnostic d'ostéoporose. Le dépistage par DXA a permis d'identifier l'ostéoporose chez 10 patients supplémentaires et l'ostéopénie chez 22 patients. Le traitement des patients atteints d'ostéoporose comprenait des bisphosphonates (n = 15, 60 %) et de la vitamine D ou du calcium (ou les deux) sans autre médicament (n = 4, 16 %). Dans la population générale de l'étude, 32 patients (22 %) prenaient du calcium et 46 (32 %) prenaient de la vitamine D. Conclusions: De nombreux patients d'au moins 50 ans recevant des soins pour le VIH à la clinique John Ruedy présentaient un risque d'ostéoporose ou l'avaient déjà développée. Il est possible d'accroître leur dépistage et leur traitement, et une équipe multidisciplinaire peut être cruciale pour atteindre cet objectif.

Appropriateness of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test for critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: In earlier work, it was shown that patients with septic shock who also have adrenal insufficiency experience a benefit in terms of lower mortality rates with hydrocortisone supplementation. As such, the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test has been used frequently to identify these patients. However, recent evidence has suggested that the identification and treatment of adrenal insufficiency in patients with septic shock does not reduce mortality. These results call into question the utility of the ACTH stimulation test in this patient population. OBJECTIVES: To determine the indications for ordering the ACTH stimulation test for critically ill patients at a tertiary care hospital and to classify the indications as either appropriate (e.g., primary adrenal insufficiency or medication-induced suppression of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis) or inappropriate (e.g., patients with septic shock, prior etomidate exposure, or absence of steroid use). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of health care records was conducted for all patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit and who had undergone an ACTH stimulation test during 2007. For each patient, the indication for the test was identified and classified as appropriate or inappropriate. RESULTS: A total of 35 ACTH stimulation tests were performed during the study period, of which 8 (23%) were classified as having an appropriate indication and 27 (77%) as having an inappropriate indication. Of the tests with an inappropriate indication, 15 (56%) were ordered for patients with septic shock. However, the number of ACTH tests ordered for this indication declined as the year progressed. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTH stimulation test was often used inappropriately for patients with septic shock. Over time, there appeared to be a trend away from use of this test in this patient population, perhaps reflecting increasing awareness of the lack of benefit.

Concomitant clozapine reduces smoking in patients treated with risperidone.

This pilot study examines the smoking behaviors of patients treated with either risperidone alone or in combination with clozapine. Smoking behavior was evaluated using expired carbon monoxide (CO) measurements, the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and a semi-structured interview. Our results indicate that patients co-prescribed clozapine with risperidone smoke significantly less than patients treated with risperidone alone (19.1+/-9.3 vs. 37.8+/-19.1 ppm CO, respectively, P=0.03). These data are consistent with previous studies showing that clozapine treatment is associated with significantly reduced smoking behavior relative to other antipsychotic agents.