RESUMO
The thalassemia screening program in Indonesia mostly conducted sporadically. Ideal prospective screening is still limited. This study aimed to compare thalassemia screening methods using the extended family approach with and without a history of severe thalassemia and the feasibility of implementing extended family screening method. A case control study was conducted in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung with 3 generations of extended families. Data were collected from 150 subjects of 8 extended families with severe thalassemia as an index case entry and 151 subjects of 12 families with no history of thalassemia. All subjects were examined for Hb, MCV, MCH, and peripheral blood smear (PBS) as initial laboratory examinations. Subjects with MCV < 80 fL, MCH < 27 pg, and suggestive findings on PBS continued hemoglobin analysis. Carrier status was determined by definition. All subjects consented to undergo screening and voluntarily participated. The proportion of thalassemia carriers and the participation rate between the 2 groups were compared. Sixty-four of 150 (42.7%) and 16 of 151 (10.6%) carriers were identified in both the case and control group (p < 0.001). The participation rate was 42-88 vs. 23-100% (p = 0.244). The mean age was 31.9 ± 21.2 vs. 31.1 ± 20.8 years (p = 0.782). The median family size was 28.5 vs. 20 subjects per family (p = 0.245). The types of identified thalassemia carrier in both groups consisted of ß-thalassemia, ß-thalassemia/HbE, suspected α-thalassemia, and ß-thalassemia Hb variant. All carriers continued the counseling process. The extended family method seems feasible to be implemented for thalassemia screening in West Java, Indonesia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor in patients with hemophilia A (PWHA) is a great challenge for hemophilia care. Both genetic and environmental factors led to complications in PWHA. The development of inhibitory antibodies is usually induced by the immune response. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), one of the cytokines, might contribute to its polymorphism. In this study, we investigated the clinical factors, level of serum TNF-α, and polymorphism of c.-308G > A TNF - α gene in inhibitor development in severe PWHA. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all PWHA in West Java province. The clinical parameters, FVIII, FVIII inhibitor, and serum TNF-α level were assessed. The genotyping of -380G > A TNF-α gene polymorphism was performed using polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Among the 258 PWHA, 216 (83.7%) were identified as severe PWHA. The FVIII inhibitor was identified in 90/216 (41.6%) of severe PWHA, consisting of 45 high-titer inhibitors (HTI) and 45 low-titer inhibitors (LTI). There was a significant correlation between serum TNF-α level and the development of HTI (p = 0.043). The cutoff point of serum TNF-α level, which can be used to differentiate between HTI and LTI, was 11.45 pg/mL. The frequency of FVIII replacement therapy was significant only in HTI of severe PWHA regarding serum TNF-α level (p = 0.028). There is no correlation between polymorphisms of -380G > A TNF-α gene and inhibitor development (p = 0.645). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FVIII inhibitor in severe PWHA in West Java, Indonesia, was 41.6%. The frequency of replacement therapy is a risk factor for inhibitor development. Serum TNF-α level might be used to differentiate between high and low inhibitor levels in severe hemophilia A, and this might support decision making regarding treatment options for inhibitor in severe hemophilia A.
