Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness Between a Slap Hammer and Rigid C-Frame Device for Extraction of an Intramedullary Nail.

BACKGROUND: Removal of orthopaedic intramedullary implants can be difficult and time-consuming. Instrumentation for implant removal is frequently deficient for effective removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of a C-type jig with a standard slap hammer attachment. We hypothesize that a C-type jig will be a more energy-efficient method for implant removal. METHODS: An intramedullary (IM) nail removal was simulated in a series of 10 tests using 40 PCF Sawbones bone blocks with drilled holes and custom-made IM nails. Each attachment was secured to a Shukla Medical threaded connector from their IM nail revision product. A camera recorded each hammer swing, and a caliper recorded the distance the nail traveled out of the bone block. The data were then analyzed to determine extraction rate and efficiency. RESULTS: The c-frame hammer exerted a greater force, had a greater extraction efficiency, and required 37.4% less energy expenditure than the slap hammer to extract the nail the same distance. The c-frame hammer also removed the nail 38.1% faster with the same energy expenditure and possessed greater usable kinetic energy, whereas the slap hammer had more "lost" energy. CONCLUSIONS: The c-frame hammer attachment was found to have a considerably higher extraction rate and efficiency than the slap hammer. It will be a more useful method of implant extraction, especially for cases involving larger bones or larger implants. However, the slap hammer may be more suitable for smaller tools or bones for which larger impact loading would be detrimental.

Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical technique commonly used to treat patients with arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. Its purpose is to reduce pain and improve shoulder function, namely range of motion (ROM) and strength. While shoulder ROM and strength have been studied extensively in patients with various shoulder pathologies, there is a dearth of knowledge with regard to the asymptomatic population. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient orthopaedic clinic following institutional review board approval. Patients 18 years of age and older with at least one asymptomatic and healthy shoulder with no prior history of shoulder surgery, injury, or pain were enrolled in the study. Demographic information, ROM, and strength measurements were collected for 256 shoulders, evenly stratified into groups by age and sex. A goniometer was used to measure forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation, and a handheld dynamometer was utilized for measuring strength. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson correlations, analysis of variance, and Bonferroni and Mann-Whitney post hoc tests, with P < .01 indicating a significant difference. Results: Abduction strength (P < .001), external rotation strength (P < .001), and internal rotation strength (P < .001) were negatively correlated with age when viewing the data as a whole and after stratification of males and females. Age and shoulder ROM, namely abduction (P < .001) and forward elevation (P < .001), were also significantly negatively correlated, although internal rotation decreased with age as well. When comparing across age groups, abduction (P = .001) and forward elevation (P = .001) were significantly higher in group 1 (18-35) when compared to group 4 (66+), but external rotation was not significantly different between these groups. External rotation (P = .001) was only significantly different between groups 2 (36-50) and 4. Variation in external rotation strength was also found. Group 4 was found to have significantly less strength than all 3 of the other groups. Conclusion: Shoulder strength significantly decreased with age, with abduction strength and external rotation strength displaying the strongest negative correlations. Decreases in strength were most prominent in patients 66 years of age and above. Shoulder ROM was not as tightly correlated with age, although abduction, forward elevation, and internal rotation were found to generally decrease over time. Differences in external rotation were not clinically significant. These correlations provide useful controls for patients of various ages regarding their clinical outcomes when presenting with shoulder pathology. Variations in current literature allow this study to verify the impact of age on shoulder ROM and strength.