RESUMO
We report our clinical experience with the external oblique intercostal block in three consecutive adult patients who underwent liver surgery for resection of metastases. Enhanced recovery guidelines for liver surgery recommend intrathecal opioids and peripheral regional anaesthetic techniques in the context of multimodal analgesia to achieve adequate postoperative analgesia and early functional recovery. However, both laparoscopic and open approaches to liver surgery involve incisions in the upper abdomen, an anatomical area not well covered by previously described peripheral regional anaesthetic techniques. The external oblique intercostal block is a novel motor- and opioid-sparing technique which blocks both the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracoabdominal nerves which innervate the upper abdominal quadrant. In all cases in this series, we performed the blocks in a short period of time and without complications. All patients remained pain- and opioid-free in the postoperative period and achieved enhanced recovery outcomes early. We found the external oblique intercostal block to be a simple, convenient, effective and opioid-sparing regional anaesthetic technique for postoperative analgesia after liver surgery. By minimising opioid use and by obviating the need for central neuraxial anaesthesia techniques in the postoperative period, this block could be incorporated into enhanced recovery protocols for hepatobiliary surgery.
RESUMO
We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.