Speaking up behavior and cognitive bias in hand hygiene: Competences of German-speaking medical students.

INTRODUCTION: Infection prevention and speaking up on errors are core qualities of health care providers. Heuristic effects (e.g. overconfidence) may impair behavior in daily routine, while speaking up can be inhibited by hierarchical barriers and medical team factors. Aim of this investigation was to determine, how medical students experience these difficulties for hand hygiene in daily routine. METHODS: On the base of prior investigations we developed a questionnaire with 5-point Likert ordinal scaled items and free text entries. This was tested for validity and reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.89). Accredited German, Swiss and Austrian universities were contacted and medical students asked to participated in the anonymous online survey. Quantitative statistics used parametric and non-parametric tests and effect size calculations according to Lakens. Qualitative data was coded according to Janesick. RESULTS: 1042 undergraduates of 12 universities participated. All rated their capabilities in hand hygiene and feedback reception higher than those of fellow students, nurses and physicians (p<0.001). Half of the participants rating themselves to be best educated, realized that faulty hand hygiene can be of lethal effect. Findings were independent from age, sex, academic course and university. Speaking-up in case of omitted hand hygiene was rated to be done seldomly and most rare on persons of higher hierarchic levels. Qualitative results of 164 entries showed four main themes: 1) Education methods in hand hygiene are insufficient, 2) Hierarchy barriers impair constructive work place culture 3) Hygiene and feedback are linked to medical ethics and 4) There is no consequence for breaking hygiene rules. DISCUSSION: Although partially limited by the selection bias, this study confirms the overconfidence-effects demonstrated in post-graduates in other settings and different professions. The independence from study progress suggests, that the effect occurs before start of the academic course with need for educational intervention at the very beginning. Qualitative data showed that used methods are insufficient and contradictory work place behavior in hospitals are frustrating. Even 20 years after "To err is human", work place culture still is far away from the desirable.

[Structured Feedback within the Framework of Communication Training in Informed Consent Prior to Surgery]. / Strukturiertes Feedback im Kommunikationstraining zur präoperativen Aufklärung: unterschiedliche Bewertungsquellen nutzbar machen.

INTRODUCTION: In many locations, communication between patients and doctors is already actively taught as part of undergraduate medicine at many. Informed consent prior to surgery is a particular reason for communication that calls for differentiated feedback to students. Within the framework of communication training, the aim was to compare the feedback given from 5 different sources (by a medical expert, by tutors, by student peers, by the student obtaining informed consent and by the simulated patients) using evaluation checklists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 171 medical students in their eighth semester at the University of Würzburg participated in a training module in obtaining informed consent prior to surgery. 50 students out of this group conducted a conversation. The emphasis laid on "communication" and "risks". Students were able to prepare using teaching materials from the University's own e-learning platform. The statistical evaluation focussed on assessing the test quality of the checklists, the scores in the scales, and interrater agreement based on the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The checklists delivered satisfactory test values with respect to internal consistency, item difficulty and discriminatory index. The average scores from the five raters only differed significantly with respect to communicative skills, whereby the students seeking informed consent were strict in their self-assessment. The student raters where highly consistent with the expert rater. With respect to "risks and complications", there was high agreement between all raters. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We were able to demonstrate that, within the highly specific setting of a simulation and after subtile preparation, a trained student tutor can provide just as effective feedback as a medical expert. Feedback from tutors or peers may be furnished with greater prominence in future, given the overall high agreement in the 360-degree feedback.

[Train-the-Trainer: Professionalisation of Didactics in Daily Clinical Routine - the Personal Perception of Clinical Teaching Staff with Respect to Didactic Competence and the Framework Conditions of Teaching]. / Train-the-Trainer: Professionalisierung der Lehre im klinischen Alltag ­ Selbsteinschätzung Lehrender zur didaktischen Kompetenz und den Rahmenbedingungen des Unterrichts.

BACKGROUND: Teaching training programs contribute to improving the quality of medical education. In a course of the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) concept of the Surgical Working Group for Teaching, teachers (TN) from different medical professions and career levels were taught together. AIM OF THE WORK: Assessments of teaching activities in everyday clinical practice of residents (AÄ), senior staff (OÄ) and nurses (KP), their perception of teaching obstacles and requirements to improve teaching. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prior to the beginning of the course, biographical data, previous teaching experiences, teaching obstacles as well as their notions to improve teaching in the daily clinical routine were requested. Upon completion, the participants were asked to rate the course. The answers to the closed and open questions were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2017, six basic courses (TTT-A) were conducted at three locations. 97 participants participated in the surveys (AÄ n = 44, OÄ n = 19, KP n = 17). More than two-thirds declared previously acquired teaching knowledge. There were no significant differences between medical and nursing staff. While AÄ and KP primarily taught at the bedside, OÄ taught mainly in the context of lectures, electives and seminars. Only a small proportion of all occupational groups felt well prepared for teaching in everyday clinical practice. The main drawbacks were lack of time and staff, too many students per group and too little teaching knowledge. Nearly two-thirds of the AÄ found teaching in general as a strong or moderate burden, compared to about 50% of the OÄ and 60% KP. Aspirations for improvement of teaching included more precise characterisation of the learning objectives, greater appreciation of teaching as a whole, and regular measures to make teaching professional. DISCUSSION: Occupational group-related differences in everyday clinical practice and individual career progression, impact type, implementation and perception of the teaching activity. By focusing on learning objectives and essential teaching methods and examination formats relevant to teaching at the bedside, teacher training programs across professional groups can contribute to knowledge and expertise growth. Indications of a sustainable effect encourage the continuation and further development of the TTT concept.

Biographic Characteristics and Factors Perceived as Affecting Female and Male Careers in Academic Surgery: The Tenured Gender Battle to Make It to the Top.

PURPOSE: Given the high attrition rate in the field of academic surgery, we aimed to characterise the professional and personal situations of female and male academic surgeons as well as to gather data on their respective perceptions of career advancement and work satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany, inviting all identifiable academically highly qualified female surgeons and their male counterparts in a 1:2 ratio to participate. An anonymous 103-item online questionnaire was designed and the data collected between July and September 2014. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 93 female and 200 male surgeons, of whom 63 women (67.7%) and 70 men (35.0%) replied. The average age was 47.5 and 47.1 years, respectively. Respondents identified 'high degree of expertise', 'ambition', and 'clarity of one's professional aims' as important factors affecting professional career development. Both groups felt 'workload', 'working hours/shifts', and 'gender' to be a hindrance, the latter of significantly greater importance to female surgeons. The mean work satisfaction scores were high in both female (69.5%) and male (75.7%) surgeons. The predictors 'support from superiors' (standardised ß coefficient = 0.41) and 'manual aptitude' (ß = 0.41) contributed incrementally to the variance in 'high degree of work satisfaction' (90-100%) observed for female surgeons. However, childcare provided by 'kindergarten/crèche/after-school care' had the greatest negative predictive value (ß = -1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are many parallels, female faculty members experience the culture of academic surgery to some extent differently from their male counterparts, especially when impacted by parenthood and childcare. Faculty development programmes need to develop strategies to improve perceived equality in career opportunities by respecting individuals' requirements as well as offering gender-appropriate career guidance.