Using CT and cholangiography to diagnose biliary tract carcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the value of CT and cholangiography for diagnosing biliary tract carcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirteen abdominal CT examinations and cholangiograms in 45 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, including 18 patients with established biliary tract carcinoma, were analyzed for tumor. Four radiologists who were unaware of the presence or absence of carcinoma rated each study as to the probability of malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of CT and cholangiography, the value of imaging signs, and the degree of inter-observer variation in interpretation. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated. RESULTS: CT outperformed cholangiography in the detection of carcinoma. The average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 for CT and 0.57 for cholangiography (p = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting carcinoma using CT were good, with average values of 82% and 80%, respectively. Average sensitivity and specificity for cholangiography were 54% and 53%, respectively. The most reliable sign of tumor on CT was a discrete mass. Progressive biliary dilatation on sequential studies was the most useful sign on cholangiography. Interobserver agreement assessed using the Cronbach alpha was fair for cholangiography and good for CT. CONCLUSION: CT provides good sensitivity and specificity and significantly outperforms cholangiography in detecting biliary tract carcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis. Despite limitations, CT and cholangiography provide useful information not otherwise available in the treatment of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia and analysis of one-year reinfection rates

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is endemic worldwide. The proposed treatment is expensive and there are few reports regarding reinfection rates in Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rates obtained with two therapeutic options and to evaluate reinfection one year after treatment. This was a prospective randomized trial with 55 patients. Thirty-nine patients had active duodenal ulcer (DU) and 16 non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), and all tested positive for HP. Diagnosis was based on at least two positive tests: ultrarapid urease test, histology and/or culture. Patients were randomized to two groups: group OMC treated with 40 mg omeprazole (once a day), 500 mg metronidazole and 250 mg clarithromycin (twice daily) for 7 days, or group NA treated with 300 mg nizatidine (once a day) and 1000 mg amoxicillin (twice daily) for 14 days. Those patients in whom HP was eradicated were followed up for one year to evaluate reinfection. Twenty-five patients were randomized for OMC and 30 for NA. HP eradication occurred in 20/25 patients (80 per cent) treated with OMC and 13/30 (43 per cent) treated with NA (P = 0.01). After reallocation because of initial treatment failure, the overall eradication rate was 44/51 patients (86 per cent). After an average follow-up of one year, we evaluated 34 patients (23 with DU and 11 with NUD). Reinfection occurred in 3/34 patients (7.6 per cent). We conclude that OMC is effective for HP eradication, and that NA should not be used. Reinfection occurs in 7.6 per cent of the patients in the first year after eradication.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia and analysis of one-year reinfection rates.

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is endemic worldwide. The proposed treatment is expensive and there are few reports regarding reinfection rates in Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rates obtained with two therapeutic options and to evaluate reinfection one year after treatment. This was a prospective randomized trial with 55 patients. Thirty-nine patients had active duodenal ulcer (DU) and 16 non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), and all tested positive for HP. Diagnosis was based on at least two positive tests: ultrarapid urease test, histology and/or culture. Patients were randomized to two groups: group OMC treated with 40 mg omeprazole (once a day), 500 mg metronidazole and 250 mg clarithromycin (twice daily) for 7 days, or group NA treated with 300 mg nizatidine (once a day) and 1000 mg amoxicillin (twice daily) for 14 days. Those patients in whom HP was eradicated were followed up for one year to evaluate reinfection. Twenty-five patients were randomized for OMC and 30 for NA. HP eradication occurred in 20/25 patients (80%) treated with OMC and 13/30 (43%) treated with NA (P = 0.01). After reallocation because of initial treatment failure, the overall eradication rate was 44/51 patients (86%). After an average follow-up of one year, we evaluated 34 patients (23 with DU and 11 with NUD). Reinfection occurred in 3/34 patients (7.6%). We conclude that OMC is effective for HP eradication, and that NA should not be used. Reinfection occurs in 7.6% of the patients in the first year after eradication.

Pancreatic pseudocysts transpapillary and transmural drainage.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage has been described as a good treatment option, with morbidity and mortality rates that are lower than surgery. The aim of our study is to describe the efficacy of different forms of endoscopic drainage and estimate pseudocyst recurrence rate after short follow up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 30 patients with pancreatic pseudocyst that presented some indication for treatment: persistent abdominal pain, infection or cholestasis. Clinical evaluation was performed with a pain scale, 0 meaning absence of pain and 4 meaning continuous pain. Pseudocysts were first evaluated by abdominal CT scan, and after endoscopic retrograde pancreatography the patients were treated by transpapillary or transmural (cystduodenostomy or cystgastrostomy) drainage. Pseudocyst resolution was documented by serial CT scans. RESULTS: 25/30 patients could be treated. Drainage was successful in 21 (70% in an 'intention to treat' basis). After a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 35.82 weeks, there was only 1 (4.2%) recurrence. A total of 6 complications occurred in 37 procedures (16.2%), and all but 2 were managed clinically and/or endoscopically: there was no mortality related to the procedure. Patients submitted to combined drainage needed more procedures than the other groups. There was no difference in the efficacy when we compared the three different drainage methods. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage is possible in most patients, with high success rate and low morbidity.

The effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on acute and chronic complications of biliary endoprostheses.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically placed biliary stents have become routine therapy for bile duct obstruction and bile leaks. Controversy exists regarding the use of biliary sphincterotomy to facilitate placement of 10F plastic stents. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the effect of sphincterotomy on acute and chronic complications of 10F stent therapy. Data for acute complications, 30-day mortality and stent migration were obtained for 130 patients undergoing placement of a single 10F plastic biliary stent. For 109 patients in whom prolonged stent therapy was undertaken, the occurrence of and time to stent dysfunction were also analyzed. Sphincterotomy was performed in 48 cases (36.9%) based on physician preference. RESULTS: There were no failures in stent placement. The incidence of acute complications was higher in patients undergoing sphincterotomy (8.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.04). Stent migration was more common in the no sphincterotomy group versus the sphincterotomy group (8.5% vs. 0, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Sphincterotomy is not necessary for placement of 10F plastic stents and increases acute procedural morbidity. Interestingly, a higher incidence of stent migration was seen in patients who did not undergo biliary sphincterotomy.

Botulinum toxin for oropharyngeal dysphagia: case report of flexible endoscope-guided injection.

Botulinum toxin (BT) has been used in neurology, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology and gastroenterology. Twenty-four patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia treated with BT injection into the cricopharyngeal muscle were reported, with good results in up to 79% of the patients. Different techniques were used to inject BT: percutaneous (guided by electromyography, computed tomography or videofluoroscopy) or direct injection during esophagoscopy (with a rigid esophagoscope). We report the first case of oropharyngeal dysphagia treated by BT injection into the cricopharyngeal muscle using a flexible scope, with clinical, radiological and manometric improvement. A reduction in the disability score 4 to 2 and sustained capacity to maintain adequate oral caloric intake were observed. The patient was also able to have the tracheotomy orifice closed and the gastrostomy tube removed after 3 months. Manometry showed a 38% reduction in the upper esophageal sphincter pressure with the presence of pharyngeal waves that were previously absent. After 1 year of follow-up, the patient was in good condition with mild dysphagia for solid foods. This is another case of complex dysphagia and relative hyperfunction of the cricopharyngeal muscle successfully treated with BT injection.

Band ligation or sclerotherapy as endoscopic treatment for oesophageal varices in schistosomotic patients: results of a randomized study.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy and banding ligation are the two preferred methods to treat oesophageal variceal bleeding. There are many reports dealing with such treatment in cirrhotic patients but we do not know how good they are to treat varices secondary to other forms of portal hypertension. Schistosomiasis mansoni is the main cause of portal hypertension and oesophageal varices in Brazil. We performed a prospective randomised study to compare: 1) the efficacy of both treatments in eradicating oesophageal varices, and 2) complications secondary to both treatments. Forty patients were divided in two groups. Both sclerotherapy and banding ligation were performed until variceal eradication. There were no severe complications. Variceal eradication was faster obtained with banding ligation than sclerotherapy although there was no statistical difference (mean number of sessions 3.05 vs 3.72, p = 0.053). Benign complications were equally frequent in both groups, although additional sedation was more common in the sclerotherapy group. We concluded that both treatments are equally effective in the eradication of oesophageal varices, although banding ligation is better tolerated by the patient and probably faster.

Prospective study of bacteremia rate after elastic band ligation and sclerotherapy of esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal band ligation is considered to be as efficient as endoscopic sclerotherapy, with a lower complication rate, including bacteremia. There are few studies comparing the two methods. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of bacteremia after both treatments in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis. METHODS: Endoscopic sclerotherapy and band ligation were performed using standard techniques. Blood samples were obtained 5 and 30 minutes after endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic organisms. RESULTS: In the sclerotherapy group 2 of 43 (4.6%) blood cultures were positive (Peptostreptococcus sp and Streptococcus mitis). A similar result was obtained in the band ligation group: 2 of 35 (5.7%) had positive cultures, both with Staphylococcus aureus. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the frequency of bacteremia after treatment of esophageal varices with endoscopic sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis.

[Comparison between invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections]. / Comparação entre testes invasivos para o diagnóstico da infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram negative bacteria that colonizes gastric epithelial cells. It has been associated with several gastric disease including chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis can be done with invasive and non-invasive methods. In invasive methods an endoscopic gastric mucosa biopsy specimen is used. In our study we compare the sensitivity, specificity, costs and applicability of four invasive diagnostic tests: culture, urease ultra-rapid test, histology (Giemsa and Hematoxilineosin stain) and fuchsin stained mucosal slides. Urease test was the easiest, fastest diagnostic test, with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100%, being also the cheapest test. We concluded that it should be the test of choice for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis.

Biliary and pancreatic stent blockage by bacterial biofilm: presentation of two cases.

Biliary and pancreatic stents are effective tools in the management of obstructive jaundice (both malignant and benign), pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, and as treatment for biliary and pancreatic fistulae. Unfortunately, stents may become blocked and require replacement in a number of patients. In the present study a blocked stent from a patient with transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst and another from a patient with obstructive jaundice resulting from cancer of the head of the pancreas associated with Mirizzi syndrome were characterized by electron microscopy. Stent blockage was diagnosed by a pressure test and stent cultures were performed. Electron microscopy of the blocked stents revealed the sludge to consist of microcolonies of bacteria mixed with amorphous material, and cultures of both stents were positive for Klebsiella sp and E. coli.

Biliary and pancreatic stent blockage by bacterial biofilm: presentation of two cases

Biliary and pancreatic stents are effective tools in the management of obstructive jaundice (both malignant and benign), pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, and as treatment for biliary and pancreatic fistulae. Unfortunately, stents may become blocked and require replacement in a number of patients. In the present study a blocked stent from a patient with transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst and another from a patient with obstructive jaundice resulting from cancer of the head of the pancreas associated with Mirizzi syndrome were characterized by electron microscopy. Stent blockage was diagnosed by a pressure test and stent cultures were performed. Electron microscopy of the blocked stents revealed the sludge to consist of microcolonies of bacteria mixed with amorphous material, and cultures of both stents were positive for Klebsiella sp and E. coli.

[Endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst]. / Terapêutica endoscópica do pseudocisto de pâncreas.

Endoscopy therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst has been described as an efficient method. We report six cases of pancreatic pseudocyst treated by pancreatic stenting (three cases), cystogastrostomy (three cases) and cystoduodenostomy (one case). Rapid symptomatic improvement and pseudocyst regression were noted in all cases, except one. Such patient needed pancreatic stenting even after cystogastrostomy due to main pancreatic duct stenosis. There were three complications: hemorrhage (one case) and pseudocyst infection (two cases), and all were treated clinically. Two patients had pseudocyst infection previous to endoscopic manipulation, and they were treated only with antibiotics and endoscopic drainage, without surgery (treatment suggested by most of the authors). We concluded that endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst is efficient and safe, being responsible for rapid relief of symptoms in most of patients.

Transferencia e contratransferencia. / Transference and countertransference

A autora faz um historico sobre os conceitos de transferencia e contratransferencia na teoria psicanalitica. A partir de Charcot, atraves dos trabalhos de S. Freud e de autores pos-freudianos, a autora considera o tema da Transferencia como agente especifico de mudanca no processo psicanalitico, visto do angulo do cliente. Quanto ao tema da Contratransferencia, a autora mostra a evolucao havida tambem em relacao a este conceito mais especifico para os sentimentos do psicanalista, e as diversas conotacoes que lhe sao dadas pelos varios autores psicanaliticos