Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 122(6): 623-629.e2, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30946915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the current perception and practice of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) use among US and international allergists. In light of 4 recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved SLIT options, perceptions and practices may be changing. OBJECTIVE: To provide updated information about current allergists' practice and perception of SLIT relative to 2007 and 2011. METHODS: On behalf of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI) Immunotherapy and Diagnostics Committee, an electronic survey was sent to all US and international allergists who were members of the ACAAI. Data were compared with previous surveys conducted and published in 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Of the 305 respondents, 268 (87.9%) practiced in the United States. A total of 197 of 268 respondents (73.5%) reported experience using SLIT compared with 45 of 766 US allergists (5.9%) in 2007 and 59 of 519 US allergists (11.4%) in 2011 (P < .001). Of the 188 respondents in the United States who used SLIT in their practice, 129 (68.6%) used FDA-approved SLIT tablets only, 44 (23.4%) used both FDA-approved SLIT tablets and SLIT drops using an extract that is FDA approved for subcutaneous immunotherapy, and 15 (8.0%) reported using only SLIT drops. Limitation of only treating one allergen was the primary barrier in using SLIT among 197 of 268 respondents (73.5%). CONCLUSION: There has been a significant increase in SLIT use in the last 5 years, with 73.5% of respondents reporting experience with it. With 4 FDA-approved SLIT therapies, this likely contributes to its more widespread use. The greatest barrier to SLIT use is the limitation of only treating one allergen.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Alergistas , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoterapia Sublingual/métodos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Infusões Subcutâneas , Percepção , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Chem Senses ; 41(4): 293-9, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809485

RESUMO

Olfactory dysfunction is a common complaint among physician visits. Olfactory loss affects quality of life and impairs function and activities of daily living. The purpose of our study was to assess the degree of odor identification associated with mental health. Olfactory function was measured using the brief smell identification test. Depressive symptoms were measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Loneliness was assessed by the de Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Cognition was measured by a battery of 19 cognitive tests. The frequency of olfactory dysfunction in our study was ~40%. Older subjects had worse olfactory performance, as previously found. More loneliness was associated with worse odor identification. Similarly, symptoms of depression were associated with worse olfaction (among men). Although better global cognitive function was strongly associated with better odor identification, after controlling for multiple factors, the associations with depression and loneliness were unchanged. Clinicians should assess these mental health conditions when treating older patients who present with olfactory deficits.


Assuntos
Depressão/complicações , Solidão/psicologia , Transtornos do Olfato/complicações , Transtornos do Olfato/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição/fisiologia , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 31(11): 1571-7, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24041643

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Household stoves are a common source of injury in the United States. PURPOSE: To investigate the epidemiology of stove-related injuries. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to analyze cases of nonfatal stove-related injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments (EDs) from 1990 through 2010. RESULTS: An estimated 910696 (95% CI, 789279-1032113) individuals were treated for stove-related injuries during the 21-year study period, yielding an average of 43366 injured persons annually or 5 injuries every hour. The number (m = -252.85; P = .033) and rate (m = -0.026; P < .001) of injured individuals significantly decreased during the study. Injuries were highest in 1991 (50656 cases; 2.0 per 10000) and lowest in 2005 (38669 cases; 1.31 per 10000), although there was an increase in 2010 (48990 cases; 1.58 per 10000). Patients ≤19 years experienced 41.3% of stove-related injuries. The primary mechanism of injury was contact with stove parts (37.5%). The body region most commonly injured was the hand (44.6%), and a thermal burn was the most common diagnosis (51.8%). The majority (94.4%) of patients were treated and released from the ED. Patients >60 years of age were 3.85 (95% CI, 2.97-4.98) times more likely to be admitted to the hospital than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive study of stove-related injuries in the United States using a nationally representative sample. Strategies to prevent stove-related injuries should address the multiple mechanisms of injury.


Assuntos
Acidentes Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Queimaduras/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Culinária , Feminino , Traumatismos da Mão/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Mão/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 26(5): 371-9, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23168151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has not been fully elucidated. Increased inflammatory cell infiltration and decreased numbers and/or impaired function of T regulatory cells (Tregs) have been reported. This study aimed to determine the role of Tregs in CRS in peripheral blood (PB) and sinus tissue. METHODS: Sinus tissue was obtained from 16 CRS subjects and 5 controls. PB from additional 16 CRS subjects and total 20 controls was obtained. Immunohistochemical analysis (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and Treg [CD4(+)-FoxP3(+) and CD25(+)-FoxP3(+)] cells) of sinus tissue was performed. Percentage of PB Tregs (CD4(+)-CD25(+)-FoxP3(+) cells) was analyzed by flow cytometry. Spontaneous and phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-induced release of cytokines (IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, interferon gamma, transforming growth factor [TGF] beta1, and TNF-alpha) from PB mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was determined. RESULTS: PB flow cytometric analysis revealed a lower percentage of Tregs in subjects with CRS compared with healthy controls (p = 0.0003). Although no differences in the PB Treg counts were observed between the CRS subjects with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP), immunohistochemical analysis performed on sinus tissue revealed a higher proportion of Tregs in CRSwNP subjects compared with CRSsNP (p < 0.05). Additionally, we failed to detect any Tregs from control sphenoid sinus tissue. Lower levels of regulatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-ß1) and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) were found from PBMCs from CRS subjects compared with controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that CRS subjects exhibit a decreased percentage of PB Tregs compared with normal controls. PBMCs from CRS subjects show a more proinflammatory and less regulatory phenotype.


Assuntos
Seios Paranasais/imunologia , Rinite/sangue , Rinite/imunologia , Sinusite/sangue , Sinusite/imunologia , Subpopulações de Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Circulação Sanguínea/imunologia , Separação Celular , Células Cultivadas , Doença Crônica , Citocinas/metabolismo , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 24(4): 286-90, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20819468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is commonly associated with olfactory loss, although the mechanism is not well studied. This study was designed to determine the effect of mometasone furoate (MF) on olfactory loss in seasonal AR (SAR) and study its effect on inflammation in the olfactory region. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel clinical trial in 17 patients with SAR who had symptoms of impaired olfaction. Subjects received MF or placebo for 2 weeks during their allergy season. Before and after treatment, we measured nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF), chemosensory quality of life, and objective olfactory function (the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test). Additionally, nasal cytology samples were obtained from each visit, and a unilateral endoscopic biopsy specimen of the olfactory epithelium was obtained at the end of the study and scored for inflammation. RESULTS: Treatment with MF was associated with improved nasal symptoms (p < 0.015), NPIF (p < 0.04), reduced nasal inflammation (p < 0.05), and chemosensory-specific quality of life (p < 0.03). Histological analysis of the olfactory region reveals fewer eosinophils in the MF group when compared with placebo (p < 0.012). We found no improvement in objective olfactory function (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of MF in SAR is associated with reduced eosinophilic inflammation in the olfactory region and improved symptoms of AR. The presence of eosinophils in the olfactory area in SAR may indicate a direct, deleterious effect of inflammation on olfactory epithelium in this disease. In this study we show that inflammation in SAR can affect the olfactory cleft, implicating a direct role for allergic inflammation in smell loss. Treatment with intranasal steroids is associated with decreased inflammation in the olfactory region in humans. This treatment is also associated with improved olfactory quality of life.


Assuntos
Cavidade Nasal/patologia , Mucosa Olfatória/patologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Administração Intranasal , Adulto , Agnosia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Ambrosia , Eosinófilos/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Inalação/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Furoato de Mometasona , Cavidade Nasal/imunologia , Mucosa Olfatória/imunologia , Poaceae , Pólen/imunologia , Pregnadienodiois/administração & dosagem , Pregnadienodiois/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/patologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...