Feasibility of Reducing Animal Numbers in Radiation Countermeasure Experiments from Historic Levels when using Sample Size Calculations.

Historically, animal numbers have most often been in the hundreds for experiments designed to estimate the dose reduction factor (DRF) of a radiation countermeasure treatment compared to a control treatment. Before 2010, researchers had to rely on previous experience, both from others and their own, to determine the number of animals needed for a DRF experiment. In 2010, a formal sample size formula was developed by Kodell et al. This theoretical work showed that sample sizes for realistic, yet hypothetical, DRF experiments could be less than a hundred animals and still have sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful DRF values. However, researchers have been slow to use the formula for their DRF experiments, whether from ignorance to its existence or hesitancy to depart from "tried and true" sample sizes. Here, we adapt the sample size formula to better fit usual DRF experiments, and, importantly, we provide real experimental evidence from two independent DRF experiments that sample sizes smaller than what have typically been used can still statistically detect clinically meaningful DRF values. In addition, we update a literature review of DRF experiments which can be used to inform future DRF experiments, provide answers to questions that researchers have asked when considering sample size calculations rather than solely relying on previous experience, whether their own or others', and, in the supplementary material, provide R code implementing the formula, along with several exercises to familiarize the user with the adapted formula.

RRx-001 Radioprotection: Enhancement of Survival and Hematopoietic Recovery in Gamma-Irradiated Mice.

The present studies evaluate the in vivo prophylactic radioprotective effects of 1-bromoacetyl-3, 3-dinitroazetidine (RRx-001), a phase III anticancer agent that inhibits c-myc and downregulates CD-47, after total body irradiation (TBI), in lethally and sublethally irradiated CD2F1 male mice. A single dose of RRx-001 was administered by intraperitoneal (IP) injection 24 h prior to a lethal or sublethal radiation dose. When irradiated with 9.35 Gy, the dose lethal to 70% of untreated mice at 30 days (LD70/30), only 33% of mice receiving RRx-001 (10 mg/kg) 24 h prior to total body irradiation (TBI) died by day 30, compared to 67% in vehicle-treated mice. The same pretreatment dose of RRx-001 resulted in a significant dose reduction factor of 1.07. In sublethally TBI mice, bone marrow cellularity was increased at day 14 in the RRx-001-treated mice compared to irradiated vehicle-treated animals. In addition, significantly higher numbers of lymphocytes, platelets, percent hematocrit and percent reticulocytes were observed on days 7 and/or 14 in RRx-001-treated mice. These experiments provide proof of principle that systemic administration of RRx-001 prior to TBI significantly improves overall survival and bone marrow regeneration.

Obtaining normal tissue constraints using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate normal tissue dose constraints while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) prescription without reducing PTV margins. Sixteen patients with oral cavity carcinoma (group I), 27 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (group II), and 28 patients with laryngeal carcinoma (group III) were reviewed. Parotid constraints were a mean dose to either parotid < 26 Gy (PP1), 50% of either parotid < 30 Gy (PP2), or 20 cc of total parotid < 20 Gy (PP3). Treatment was intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). All patients met constraints for cord and brain stem. The mandibular constraints were met in 66%, 29%, and 57% of patients with oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, respectively. Mean dose of 26 Gy (PP1) was achieved in 44%, 41%, and 38% of oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal patients. PP2 (parotid constraint of 30 Gy to less than 50% of one parotid) was the easiest to achieve (group I, II, and III: 82%, 76%, and 78%, respectively). PP3 (20 cc of total parotid < 20 Gy) was difficult, and was achieved in 25%, 17%, and 35% of oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal patients, respectively. Mean parotid dose of 26 Gy was met 40% of the time. However, a combination of constraints allowed for sparing of the parotid based on different criteria and was met in high numbers. This was accomplished without reducing PTV-parotid overlap. What dose constraint best correlates with subjective and objective functional outcomes remains a focus for future study.