RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) tuberculosis (TB) symptom screening instrument (WHO-TB) can identify human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals at low risk of tuberculosis (TB); however, many patients report WHO-TB symptoms and require further TB investigations. We hypothesized that further clinical scoring could classify subjects with a positive WHO-TB screening result (WHO-TB(+)) for the likelihood of TB. METHODS: HIV-infected adults eligible to initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) were recruited and prospectively followed at 5 Ethiopian health centers. Irrespective of symptoms, all participants underwent sputum bacteriological testing for TB. Symptoms, physical findings, hemoglobin, and CD4 cell count results were compared between subjects with and those without bacteriologically confirmed TB. Variables associated with TB in WHO-TB(+) individuals were used to construct a scoring algorithm with multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 812 participants, 137 (16.9%) had TB. One hundred fifty-nine persons (20%) had a negative WHO-TB screen, 10 of whom had TB (negative predictive value [NPV], 94% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 90%-97.5%]). For WHO-TB(+) subjects, the following variables were independently associated with TB, and were assigned 1 point each in the clinical scoring algorithm: cough, Karnofsky score ≤80, mid-upper arm circumference <20 cm, lymphadenopathy, and hemoglobin <10 g/dL. Among subjects with 0-1 points, 20 of 255 had TB (NPV, 92% [95% CI, 89%-95%]), vs 19 of 34 participants with ≥4 points (positive predictive value, 56% [95% CI, 39%-73%]). The use of WHO-TB alone identified 159 of 784 (20%) with a low risk of TB, vs 414 of 784 (53%) using WHO-TB followed by clinical scoring (P< .001). The difference in proportions of confirmed TB in these subsets was nonsignificant (6.3% vs 7.2%; P= .69). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical scoring can further classify HIV-infected adults with positive WHO-TB screen to assess the risk of TB, and would reduce the number of patients in need of further TB investigations before starting ART. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01433796.
RESUMO
This prospective non-randomized study of clinic attendees, compares self-reported HIV disclosure patterns in relation to access to antiretroviral access and counselling. It was carried out in public sector hospital HIV clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa, and 144 HIV-positive men and women attending the HIV clinics participated in the study.The results showed that there was no correlation between being on antiretroviral therapy and disclosure of HIV status. There was also no correlation between disclosure of HIV status and with different levels of counselling and access to support groups. Disclosure levels were high (92% told at least one person), however, there was a high level of delayed (15% greater than a year) or non-disclosure (21%) to partners. Family members and partners provided most moral support after disclosure. Having access to antiretroviral therapy and support groups and available counselling did not seem to affect disclosure patterns. It is possible that a patients beliefs about their treatment plays a more important role for disclosure than the actual treatment itself. Other factors are also likely important for disclosure, such as the patient's social network especially with their families, and knowledge of the disease.
