Long-Term Safety and Tolerability During a Clinical Trial and Open-Label Extension of Low-Sodium Oxybate in Participants with Narcolepsy with Cataplexy.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) were established in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 withdrawal study in adults with narcolepsy with cataplexy; however, the longer-term safety profile has not yet been examined. The aim of the current analysis was to assess the time of onset and duration of common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for LXB throughout the open-label optimized treatment and titration period (OLOTTP) and the stable dose period (SDP) portions of the main study, and the subsequent 24-week open-label extension (OLE). METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of LXB, TEAEs were evaluated during the 12-week OLOTTP, the 2-week SDP, and the subsequent 24-week OLE. Eligible participants were aged 18-70 years with a diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy. At study entry, participants were taking sodium oxybate (SXB) alone, SXB with other anticataplectics, other anticataplectics alone, or were anticataplectic-treatment naive; other anticataplectics were tapered and discontinued during the OLOTTP. All participants initiated LXB during week 1 of the OLOTTP, and their dose was individually titrated based on safety and efficacy. Following the main study period, participants entered the OLE after rescreening (re-entry) after discontinuing LXB treatment or directly after completing the main study (rollover). TEAEs were assessed in the safety population as of database lock. TEAE duration was defined as time from TEAE start date to end date (or end of SDP or OLE, if end date was unrecorded). RESULTS: The safety population included 201 participants (SXB alone, n = 52; SXB with other anticataplectics, n = 23; other anticataplectics alone, n = 36; anticataplectic-treatment naive, n = 90). During the OLOTTP/SDP, headache was the most common LXB-emergent TEAE overall (71 events; n = 42 (21%); median (range) duration = 1 (1-147) day), followed by nausea (31 events; n = 26 (13%); median (range) duration = 9 (1-54) days) and dizziness (26 events; n = 21 (10%); median (range) duration = 7 (1-117) days). Among the 74 participants in the OLE, the most commonly reported TEAEs were headache (14 events; n = 7, 9%; peak incidence month 3 (n = 5/72); median (range) duration = 1 (1‒25) day), dizziness (8 events; n = 5, 7%; peak incidence month 1 (n = 3/74); median (range) duration = 26 (1‒181) days), and nasopharyngitis (6 events; n = 6, 8%; peak incidence month 6 (n = 2/69); median (range) duration = 9 (1‒24) days). Overall, study discontinuations attributed to TEAEs were 21/65 (32%) during the OLOTTP and SDP and 3/7 (43%) during the OLE. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term analysis, the safety and tolerability profile of LXB was generally consistent with the known safety profile of SXB. During the OLOTTP and SDP, most TEAEs occurred early and were generally of short duration. TEAE prevalence decreased throughout the duration of the OLE; the most common TEAEs reported during the OLE were headache, dizziness, and nasopharyngitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03030599 (25 January 2017).

Low-sodium oxybate (LXB) is a medicine for narcolepsy. LXB treats daytime sleepiness and cataplexy (sudden muscle weakness). LXB is like sodium oxybate (SXB) but has 92% less sodium. This study looked at side effects in people taking LXB for many months. Three study periods were looked at in this report. In period 1, people could change their LXB dose for 12 weeks. This was to find their best dose. In period 2, people took that same best dose for 2 weeks. In period 3, some people kept taking LXB for 24 weeks. This was to study the longer-term effects. Everyone knew that they were taking LXB. During periods 1 and 2, the most common side effect was headache. Nausea and dizziness were also common. During period 3, headache was also the most common side effect. Dizziness and nasopharyngitis were also common. Nasopharyngitis is a cold in the nose and throat. In periods 1 and 2, most side effects happened early on. They also ended quickly. Fewer side effects happened in period 3. Among people leaving the study early, 32% left because of side effects during periods 1 and 2. During period 3, 43% left because of side effects. Overall, long-term side effects in people taking LXB were similar to those seen with SXB.

Changes in Cataplexy Frequency in a Clinical Trial of Lower-Sodium Oxybate with Taper and Discontinuation of Other Anticataplectic Medications.

BACKGROUND: Lower-sodium oxybate (LXB) is an oxybate medication with the same active moiety as sodium oxybate (SXB) and a unique composition of cations, resulting in 92% less sodium. LXB was shown to improve cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in people with narcolepsy in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study (NCT03030599). Additional analyses of data from this study were conducted to explore the effects of LXB on cataplexy, including the clinical course and feasibility of transition from other anticataplectics to LXB monotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of these analyses was to evaluate cataplexy frequency during initiation/optimization of LXB and taper/discontinuation of prior antidepressant/anticataplectic medications. METHODS: Eligible participants (adults aged 18-70 years with narcolepsy with cataplexy) entered the study taking SXB only (group A), SXB + other anticataplectics (group B), or anticataplectic medication other than SXB (group C), or were cataplexy-treatment naive (group D). LXB was initiated/optimized during a 12-week, open-label, optimized treatment and titration period (OLOTTP). Other anticataplectics were tapered/discontinued during weeks 3-10 of OLOTTP. A 2-week stable-dose period (SDP; during which participants took a stable dose of open-label LXB) and 2-week double-blind randomized withdrawal period (during which participants were randomized to continue LXB treatment or switch to placebo) followed OLOTTP. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded throughout the duration of the study. RESULTS: At the beginning of OLOTTP, median weekly cataplexy attacks were lower in participants taking SXB at study entry (SXB only [2.00]; SXB + other anticataplectics [0.58]) versus participants who were taking other anticataplectics (3.50) or were anticataplectic naive (5.83). Median weekly cataplexy attacks decreased during weeks 1-2 of OLOTTP in all groups. Increased cataplexy frequency was observed in participants tapering/discontinuing other anticataplectics during weeks 3-10 and was more prominent in participants taking other anticataplectics alone compared with those taking SXB plus other anticataplectics. Cataplexy frequency decreased throughout initiation/optimization in anticataplectic-naive participants. Median number of cataplexy-free days/week at the end of SDP (study week 14) was similar in all groups (6.0, 6.1, 6.0, and 6.2 in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). During OLOTTP and SDP, TEAEs of worsening cataplexy were reported in 0%, 47.8%, 16.7%, and 2.2% of participants in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively; most TEAEs of worsening cataplexy were reported during tapering/discontinuation of other anticataplectics. CONCLUSIONS: LXB monotherapy was effective in reducing cataplexy and increasing cataplexy-free days. These results illustrate the feasibility of switching from SXB to LXB while tapering/discontinuing other anticataplectics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in Subjects With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03030599 ; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03030599.

People with narcolepsy are often sleepy during the day. They may also have sudden muscle weakness (known as cataplexy). Lower-sodium oxybate (LXB) is a narcolepsy medicine that is similar to sodium oxybate (SXB) but has 92% less sodium. A recent study found that treatment with LXB was better at reducing how often people with narcolepsy had sleepiness and cataplexy than no medicine at all (NCT03030599). This paper is about the first 12 weeks of that study, when all the people taking part in the study first tried LXB to check that they were being given the right amount. In people who only took LXB, cataplexy happened less often over time. Some people were already taking other medicines to treat their cataplexy (such as antidepressants), so they were asked to slowly stop those medicines while taking LXB. In those people, cataplexy happened more often at first as they stopped taking antidepressants and then less often later on. The increase in cataplexy when antidepressants were stopped was smaller in people who switched from SXB to LXB. This study shows that many people getting treatment for narcolepsy can switch to LXB without their cataplexy becoming worse.

Development of a lower-sodium oxybate formulation for the treatment of patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium oxybate (SXB) is a standard of care for cataplexy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy. At recommended dosages in adults (6-9 g/night), SXB increases daily dietary intake of sodium by 1100-1640 mg. Because excess sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure and cardiovascular risk, an oxybate formulation containing 92% less sodium than SXB (lower-sodium oxybate; LXB) was developed to provide an alternative oxybate treatment option. In 2020, LXB was approved for treatment of cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in patients 7 years of age and older with narcolepsy, and in 2021, for treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. AREAS COVERED: Development of LXB from initial concept to regulatory approval is described, including formulation development and preclinical and clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence evaluations from phase 1 clinical trials are detailed. Efficacy and safety results from phase 3 clinical trials of LXB in patients with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia are presented and discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Reducing sodium from high sodium‒containing medications is an important step to offset cardiovascular risks associated with high sodium consumption. The development of LXB exemplifies the importance of a collaborative approach to drug development, with patient needs paramount. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®) is a medication for people with narcolepsy aged 7 years and older. Xyrem treats symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy (attacks of muscle weakness caused by emotion) in narcolepsy. At the recommended dosages in adults, Xyrem adds a large amount of sodium to daily dietary intake. Too much sodium in the diet is associated with increased blood pressure and risks of damage to the heart and blood vessels. Researchers used calcium, magnesium, and potassium ions in addition to a small amount of sodium to make a new oxybate medication, called Xywav®, that has 92% less sodium than Xyrem. Xywav and Xyrem were similar in laboratory and animal studies. In people, the body absorbs and processes Xywav slightly differently than Xyrem, but Xywav treatment has been shown to work the same to reduce symptoms of cataplexy and EDS in people with narcolepsy and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Another neurological disorder with EDS is called idiopathic hypersomnia. Based on a clinical study, Xywav also reduced EDS and other symptoms in people with idiopathic hypersomnia. Side effects with Xywav are similar to those seen in previous studies with Xyrem.

Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and bioequivalence of lower-sodium oxybate in healthy participants in two open-label, randomized, crossover studies.

American Academy of Sleep Medicine practice parameters designate sodium oxybate (SXB) as a standard of care for cataplexy, excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), and disrupted night-time sleep in narcolepsy. Recently, a lower-sodium oxybate (LXB) with 92% less sodium than SXB was approved in the United States for the treatment of cataplexy or EDS in patients 7 years of age and older with narcolepsy. Two phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose crossover pharmacokinetic studies in healthy adults were conducted. Single 4.5-g oral doses of LXB and SXB were administered in a fasted or fed state. In the fasted state at equivalent oxybate doses, LXB, compared with SXB, had a lower maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ; study 1 [total aqueous volume, 240 ml]: 101.8 vs. 135.7 µg/ml; study 2 [60 ml]: 94.6 vs. 123.0 µg/ml), delayed time to Cmax (Tmax ; study 1: 0.75 vs. 0.5 h; study 2: 1.0 vs. 0.5 h), but similar area under the curve (AUC; study 1: AUC0-t , 235.4 vs. 263.9 µg∙h/ml; AUC0-∞ , 236.5 vs. 265.2 µg∙h/ml; study 2: AUC0-t , 241.5 vs. 254.7 µg∙h/ml; AUC0-∞ , 243.1 vs. 256.3 µg∙h/ml). Bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC but not Cmax (both studies). Cmax and AUC were lower under fed than fasted conditions (LXB and SXB); differences between fed versus fasted were smaller for LXB than SXB. These pharmacokinetic differences between LXB and SXB are likely due to the lower sodium content in LXB. Pooled analyses demonstrated that a higher Cmax is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Efficacy and safety of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium oxybates (lower-sodium oxybate [LXB]; JZP-258) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study in adults with narcolepsy with cataplexy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluate efficacy and safety of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB), a novel oxybate medication with 92% less sodium than sodium oxybate (SXB). METHODS: Adults aged 18-70 years with narcolepsy with cataplexy were eligible. The study included a ≤30-day screening period; a 12-week, open-label, optimized treatment and titration period to transition to LXB from previous medications for the treatment of cataplexy; a 2-week stable-dose period (SDP); a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP); and a 2-week safety follow-up. During DBRWP, participants were randomized 1:1 to placebo or to continue LXB treatment. RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed in 134 participants who received randomized treatment, and safety was assessed in all enrolled participants (N = 201). Statistically significant worsening of symptoms was observed in participants randomized to placebo, with median (first quartile [Q1], third quartile [Q3]) change in weekly number of cataplexy attacks from SDP to DBRWP (primary efficacy endpoint) in the placebo group of 2.35 (0.00, 11.61) versus 0.00 (-0.49, 1.75) in the LXB group (p < 0.0001; mean [standard deviation, SD] change: 11.46 [24.751] vs 0.12 [5.772]), and median (Q1, Q3) change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (key secondary efficacy endpoint) of 2.0 (0.0, 5.0) in the placebo group versus 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) in the LXB group (p < 0.0001; mean [SD] change: 3.0 [4.68] vs 0.0 [2.90]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with LXB were headache (20.4%), nausea (12.9%), and dizziness (10.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of LXB for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness was demonstrated. The safety profile of LXB was consistent with SXB. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03030599.

Outcome of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma with hypersensitivity to pegaspargase treated with PEGylated Erwinia asparaginase, pegcrisantaspase: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Erwinia asparaginase is a Food and Drug Administration approved agent for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for patients who develop hypersensitivity to Escherichia coli derived asparaginases. Erwinia asparaginase is efficacious, but has a short half-life, requiring six doses to replace one dose of the most commonly used first-line asparaginase, pegaspargase, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugated E. coli asparaginase. Pegcristantaspase, a recombinant PEGylated Erwinia asparaginase with improved pharmacokinetics, was developed for patients with hypersensitivity to pegaspargase. Here, we report a series of patients treated on a pediatric phase 2 trial of pegcrisantaspase. PROCEDURE: Pediatric patients with ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma and hypersensitivity to pegaspargase enrolled on Children's Oncology Group trial AALL1421 (Jazz 13-011) and received intravenous pegcrisantaspase. Serum asparaginase activity (SAA) was monitored before and after dosing; immunogenicity assays were performed for antiasparaginase and anti-PEG antibodies and complement activation was evaluated. RESULTS: Three of the four treated patients experienced hypersensitivity to pegcrisantaspase manifested as clinical hypersensitivity reactions or rapid clearance of SAA. Immunogenicity assays demonstrated the presence of anti-PEG immunoglobulin G antibodies in all three hypersensitive patients, indicating a PEG-mediated immune response. CONCLUSIONS: This small series of patients, nonetheless, provides data, suggesting preexisting immunogenicity against the PEG moiety of pegaspargase and poses the question as to whether PEGylation may be an effective strategy to optimize Erwinia asparaginase administration. Further study of larger cohorts is needed to determine the incidence of preexisting antibodies against PEG-mediated hypersensitivity to pegaspargase.

Safety and tolerability of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system: findings from a pooled data analysis of four clinical trials.

Acute postoperative pain remains inadequately managed. Although patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) represents a significant advance in postoperative pain management, drawbacks may include invasiveness and the potential for programming errors. The analysis presented here is based on pooled patient-level safety data from four multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trials that evaluated the safety and tolerability of the needle-free, preprogrammed fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) versus morphine intravenous PCA for postoperative pzin management; the results for patients who received fentanyl ITS are presented here. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and clinically relevant respiratory depression were assessed across patient subpopulations categorized by age. A total of 1288 patients, including 356 elderly (>65 years of age) patients, received fentanyl ITS following surgery. The most commonly reported AEs included nausea, fever, vomiting, headache, anemia, pruritus, and hypotension. The incidence of AEs was generally lower for elderly patients than for patients 65 years or younger. Application-site reactions were reported for 18.6 percent of patients using fentanyl ITS and were generally mild to moderate in severity. No cases of clinically relevant respiratory depression were reported for patients who received fentanyl ITS. The results demonstrate that fentanyl ITS is safe and well tolerated for postoperative pain management for patients overall and for subpopulations divided according to age.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of OROS hydromorphone in patients with chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of long-term repeated dosing of OROS hydromorphone in chronic pain patients. DESIGN: This multicenter, open-label extension trial enrolled patients from three short-term OROS hydromorphone trials. SETTING: Fifty-six centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Adults with chronic cancer pain or chronic nonmalignant pain who were receiving stable doses of OROS hydromorphone (> or = 8 mg/day). Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled, 106 patients completed at least 12 months of therapy. INTERVENTIONS: OROS hydromorphone (individualized doses) was administered once daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and efficacy (Brief Pain Inventory and patient and investigator global evaluations) were assessed at monthly visits. RESULTS: The median duration of extended OROS hydromorphone therapy was 274 days. The median daily dose of study medication was 32.0 mg at extension-study baseline, 40.0 mg at month 3, and 48.0 mg at months 6, 9, and 12, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (n = 93, 24.0 percent) and constipation (n = 75, 19.3 percent). The analgesic effects of OROS hydromorphone, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory, were maintained throughout the extension. At 12 months, 72.4 percent of patients and 75.9 percent of investigators rated overall treatment as good, very good, or excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily OROS hydromorphone is an osmotically driven, controlled-release preparation that may be particularly well suited to long-term use, because it provides consistent plasma concentrations and sustained around-the-clock analgesia. In this study, the benefits of OROS hydromorphone attained in short-term studies were maintained in the long-term when daily administration was continued.

Anaesthesia for ophthalmologic surgical procedures in a patient with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Anaesthesia procedures for surgical interventions in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are not commonly found in clinical practice, and often have special considerations that must be taken into account in treatment planning. As a result, these procedures are rarely subject to publication, rendering it difficult for the anaesthesiologists to find useful and reliable information on this topic. ALS also presents a contraindication to the use of nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking drugs during general anaesthesia. CASE PRESENTATION: In the case presented here, a 52-year old, White man, the progression of the disease to tetraparesis and respiratory failure, in addition to having the patient on chronic mechanical ventilation support, provided additional challenges to the handling team. The maturation of cataracts severely impaired communication with the patient, and surgical treatment of the cataract presented the only means to save communication. Such interventions are generally performed under local anaesthesia with the advice of the attending anaesthesiologist. However, in this case the patients' announcements during the operation would be unreadable to the advising anaesthesiologist. Here, the authors share experiences from a successfully applied combination of topical and general anaesthesia for two cataract operations and a vitrectomy. This was tolerated well by the patient, and without any side-effects. CONCLUSION: The applied treatment resulted in a substantial improvement of the vision and allowed communication to be maintained with the patient.

[Selected factors affecting long-term outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation]. / Analiza wybranych czynników wplywajacych na odlegle wyniki resuscytacji po wewngtrzszpitalnych zatrzymaniach krazenia.

BACKGROUND: Results of resuscitation attempts and subsequent survival rates can now be analysed, based on the Utstein templates. Few such reports have been published so far in Poland. METHODS: We have retrospectively analysed the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation attempts, performed during 30 months in a large university hospital.The buildings were spread over 5.72 hectares, with the longest distance between buildings being 500 m. The resuscitation team consisted of an anaesthesiologist and a specialized nurse equipped with a basic set containing airway equipment, intravenous cannulas and drugs. Resuscitation protocols were analysed according to the Utstein templates. RESULTS: There were 198 resuscitation attempts registered. In 47% of the cases, the circulation returned, but 28% of the patients died within 24 hours. 11% were discharged home, however 9 patients died within the next 6 months. 6% of the resuscitated patients survived over 12 months and were rated grade 1 or 2 on the CPC (Cerebral Performance Category) scale.The 12-month survival rate correlated only with the time from cardiac arrest to the first adrenaline injection. The in-hospital survival rate (possibility of discharge) correlated with the duration of hospitalization before cardiac arrest, the first registered cardiac rhythm (defibrillation-susceptible), and the time to first defibrillation. DISCUSSION: The most pronounced difference between the results of in-hospital and pre-hospital CPR was the primary cardiac rhythm associated with the cardiac arrest. Defibrillation-susceptible rhythm was observed in only 15% of cases, and was associated with immediate survival and hospital discharge, but not with 12-month survival. The time to administration of the first dose of adrenaline was a sole factor associated with 12 month survival.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of once-daily OROS hydromorphone in patients with chronic low back pain: a pilot open-label study (DO-127).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily osmotic controlled-release oral delivery system (OROS) hydromorphone in patients with chronic low back pain of moderate-to-severe intensity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 6-week, multicenter, nonrandomized, noncomparative, open-label, repeat-dose study of chronic (> or = 6 weeks) low back pain. The study comprised three periods: prior opioid stabilization (2-7 days); OROS hydromorphone conversion, titration, and stabilization (3-14 days); and OROS hydromorphone maintenance (28 days). Patients were evaluated weekly. Baseline pain assessment was performed at the end of prior opioid stabilization. For pain relief rating, endpoint was defined as the mean pain relief score from the last 2 nonmissing days before study termination. For other assessments, endpoint was defined as the last post-baseline evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 207 patients who received the study drug, 131 completed the trial. Scores (mean +/- SD) for Brief Pain Inventory 'worst pain in the last 24 hours' decreased significantly from baseline to endpoint (-0.8 +/- 2.06, p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients and investigators rating the global effectiveness as good, very good, or excellent increased from 31.6% at baseline while patients were on prior opioids to 63.2% at endpoint while patients received OROS hydromorphone, and from 29.8% at baseline while patients were on prior opioids to 65.8% at endpoint while patients received OROS hydromorphone, respectively. Daily pain relief ratings also increased significantly (+0.26 +/- 1.084, p = 0.0008). Significant improvements in health-related quality of life and sleep problems were observed. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; the most common of these were constipation, nausea, headache, and somnolence. The limitations of this study include its pilot-type design and the lack of comparison of OROS hydromorphone with a placebo or another drug. Additional comparative and longer-term studies are needed to confirm these findings. CONCLUSIONS: OROS hydromorphone may be an effective treatment for chronic low back pain of moderate-to-severe intensity. Adverse events were typical of those associated with opioid therapy.