Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thorax ; 77(5): 511-513, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086914

RESUMO

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with significant comorbidity, preventable accidents and reduced quality of life. Little is known about the research priorities of patients with OSA, family members and clinicians. A James Lind Alliance research priority setting partnership was conducted. An initial survey (690 respondents who generated 1110 questions), a prioritisation survey (250 respondents), and a final workshop were used to identify the top 10 research priorities. Consensus was achieved on the top-ranked research priorities. Our results will inform the efforts of funders, researchers and policy-makers to align directly with stakeholder priorities related to OSA.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Pesquisa , Pesquisadores , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia
2.
CMAJ Open ; 9(4): E1034-E1039, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34815258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to inform decision-making and safe delivery of vaccines in a timely manner. Our objective is to describe the methods we used to perform a patient-oriented realist evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination implementation in Saskatchewan, Canada, in order to understand the underlying mechanisms and contexts of vaccination implementation and vaccine uptake. METHODS: This methodology paper describes a patient-oriented, realist, mixed-method evaluation to assess COVID-19 vaccination implementation in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert, Saskatchewan. The study comprised 3 iterative phases guided by Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards II (RAMESES II). In phase 1 (January-February 2021), we developed the initial program theory, in phase 2 (March-May 2021), we tested and refined the initial program theory, and in phase 3 (June-July 2021), we established the final program theory. Three patient and family partners with different backgrounds and experiences were selected purposively from various locations (urban and rural) in Saskatchewan to engage collaboratively in the evaluation. Data analysis and synthesis occurred at all 3 phases of the project. We analysed qualitative data from phases 2 and 3 using a "retroductive" approach. We used quantitative data to compare outcomes from the 3 sites. INTERPRETATION: This protocol describes how we developed a final program theory for COVID-19 vaccination implementation with patient and family partners to show for whom, under what circumstances, how and why Saskatchewan's COVID-19 vaccination program has led to vaccine uptake. With patient and family partners' engagement, the evaluation findings will be shared with the Saskatchewan Health Authority and provincial government policy-makers and communications departments, published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at provincial or national conferences, and disseminated through any additional media identified by the patient and family partners.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Vacinação/métodos , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , SARS-CoV-2 , Saskatchewan
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...